Determination of Optimal Frequency in Magnetic Eddy Current Testing for Discrimination of Inner Defect or Outer Defect

被引:0
|
作者
Chae S.A. [1 ]
Song M.S. [1 ]
Um D.Y. [2 ]
Park G.S. [1 ]
机构
[1] Dept. of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Pusan National University
[2] School of Engineering, Newcastle University
关键词
DC magnetization; driving frequency; eddy current testing; magnetic permeability; non-destructive testing;
D O I
10.5370/KIEE.2024.73.3.531
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
This paper is a study on the determination of optimal frequency in Magnetic Eddy Current Testing (MEC) for characterizing defects in ferromagnetic steel pipe inspection. Conventional methods have their own limitations so that cannot distinguish between inner defects and outer defects. MEC can overcome the limitations of conventional methods. It can not only detect both inner defect and outer defects, but also distinguish between them. It is important to determine frequency to distinguish two defects in MEC. In this paper, the principle of distinguishing two defects has been explained and appropriate frequency was proposed. By using frequency that makes the phase of signal varies for each defect, two defects can be distinguished. Finite element simulation and experiment were performed. The result shows that the frequency increases, the phase difference between two defects also increases so that it can distinguish two defects through the phase difference of the signals. © 2024 Korean Institute of Electrical Engineers. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:531 / 537
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Frequency-domain defect characterization in pulsed eddy current testing
    Zeng, Zhiwei
    Li, Yansong
    Huang, Lin
    Luo, Minfang
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF APPLIED ELECTROMAGNETICS AND MECHANICS, 2014, 45 (1-4) : 621 - 625
  • [2] OPTIMIZING DEFECT DETECTION IN EDDY CURRENT TESTING
    DODD, CV
    DEEDS, WE
    SPOERI, WG
    MATERIALS EVALUATION, 1971, 29 (03) : 59 - &
  • [3] Analytical solution for magnetic field of cylindrical defect in eddy current nondestructive testing
    Yu, Yating
    Gao, Kuanhou
    Theodoulidis, Theodoros
    Yuan, Fei
    PHYSICA SCRIPTA, 2020, 95 (01)
  • [4] Identification of a backside defect by using Eddy Current Testing
    Enokizono, M
    Todaka, T
    Katai, T
    NONLINEAR ELECTROMAGNETIC SYSTEMS, 1996, 10 : 752 - 755
  • [5] Automated quantitative defect characterization by eddy current testing
    Shyamsunder, MT
    Raj, B
    Rao, BPC
    Jayakumar, T
    Kalyanasundaram, P
    REVIEW OF PROGRESS IN QUANTITATIVE NONDESTRUCTIVE EVALUATION, VOLS 20A AND 20B, 2001, 557 : 649 - 655
  • [6] Pulsed Eddy Current Testing - Application to Defect Evaluation
    Smetana, Milan
    Janousek, Ladislav
    Capova, Klara
    Michniakova, Maria
    ELECTROMAGNETIC NONDESTRUCTIVE EVALUATION (XIV), 2011, 35 : 233 - 240
  • [7] Eddy current testing on weld defect based on the dual frequency independent component analysis
    Wang, Chao
    Wang, Kai
    Cong, Zheng
    Cui, Ziqiang
    2017 IEEE INTERNATIONAL INSTRUMENTATION AND MEASUREMENT TECHNOLOGY CONFERENCE (I2MTC), 2017, : 1434 - 1438
  • [8] Comparison of defect detection limits in Lorentz force eddy current testing and classical eddy current testing
    Otterbach, Jan Marc
    Schmidt, Reinhard
    Brauer, Hartmut
    Ziolkowski, Marek
    Toepfer, Hannes
    JOURNAL OF SENSORS AND SENSOR SYSTEMS, 2018, 7 (02) : 453 - 459
  • [9] Research on the quantification of defect in the nondestructive testing of pulse eddy current
    Liang Y.
    Yang S.
    Wen X.
    Yin H.
    Huang L.
    Yi Qi Yi Biao Xue Bao/Chinese Journal of Scientific Instrument, 2018, 39 (11): : 70 - 78
  • [10] Pulsed eddy current imaging and frequency spectrum analysis for hidden defect nondestructive testing and evaluation
    He, Yunze
    Pan, Mengchun
    Luo, Feilu
    Tian, Guiyun
    NDT & E INTERNATIONAL, 2011, 44 (04) : 344 - 352