QUANTIFICATION OF INTER-BUILDING VARIABILITY OF NATURAL VIBRATION PERIOD OF RC FRAME BUILDINGS

被引:0
|
作者
Xiang M.-J. [1 ]
Chen J. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] College of Civil Engineering, Tongji University, Shanghai
[2] State Key Laboratory of Disaster Reduction in Civil Engineering, Shanghai
来源
Gongcheng Lixue/Engineering Mechanics | 2024年 / 41卷 / 05期
关键词
inter-building variability; natural vibration period; random function model; regional seismic risk assessment; reinforce concrete frame building;
D O I
10.6052/j.issn.1000-4750.2022.05.0404
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Reinforced concrete (RC) frame structures are important targets in urban seismic risk assessment with their natural vibration periods exhibiting significant inter-building variability, i.e. different periods for the same height. This is neglected in seismic design stage by using a deterministic building height-period formula, as a result, the seismic performance of existing buildings may be incorrectly estimated, and thus the natural vibration period needs to be reasonably quantified in regional seismic risk assessment. In this study, a database containing measured building heights and natural periods in the longitudinal and transverse directions of 641 RC frame buildings is constructed through literature searching, and a height-dependent random period function model is proposed based on stringent data filtering and a physics-guided data-driven methodology to consider the interbuilding variability. The comparison with the classical statistical regression random period model shows that the proposed model can better represent the difference in physical mechanisms of interbuilding natural periods and meanwhile well capture the joint probability characteristics of observed data, therefore could be applicable in regional seismic risk assessment. © 2024 Tsinghua University. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:87 / 95
页数:8
相关论文
共 29 条
  • [1] YAN Jiaqi, CHEN Xiangzhao, SUN Baitao, Review of estimation methods and systems used to predict earthquake casualties, Engineering Mechanics, 38, 12, pp. 1-16, (2021)
  • [2] KANG C, KWON O S, SONG J H., Evaluation of correlation between engineering demand parameters of structures for seismic system reliability analysis, Structural Safety, 93, (2021)
  • [3] WANG Dongming, GAO Yongwu, Study on the probabilistic seismic disaster risk assessment of urban building complex, Engineering Mechanics, 36, 7, pp. 165-173, (2019)
  • [4] CHEN Jun, SONG Yinghao, WANG Zetao, Multi-factor machine learning prediction model for the natural period of buildings, Engineering Mechanics, 41, 2, pp. 171-179, (2024)
  • [5] WANG Guangjun, FAN Shuirong, Manual of calculation method and measured data for building natural vibration period, (1988)
  • [6] DAVID M V, RICARDO G A., Propiedades dinámicas de edificios de la ciudad de México [J], Revista de Ingeniería Sismica, 51, pp. 25-45, (1995)
  • [7] GULER K, YUKSEL E, KOCAK A., Estimation of the fundamental vibration period of existing RC buildings in Turkey utilizing ambient vibration records, Journal of Earthquake Engineering, 12, pp. 140-150, (2008)
  • [8] GALLIPOLI M R, MUCCIARELLI M, SKETMOTNIKAR B, Et al., Empirical estimates of dynamic parameters on a large set of European buildings, Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, 8, 3, pp. 593-607, (2010)
  • [9] OLIVEIRA C S, NAVARRO M., Fundamental periods of vibration of RC buildings in Portugal from in-situ experimental and numerical techniques, Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, 8, 3, pp. 609-642, (2010)
  • [10] LIU Hongbiao, GUO Xun, LIANG Yongduo, Et al., Structural natural period measurement in seismic fortification intensity 9, Building Structure, 41, 5, pp. 60-62, (2011)