Multi-objective optimisation design of cross-shaft based on Kriging response surface optimisation model

被引:0
|
作者
Xie Y. [1 ,2 ]
Xiong S. [1 ,3 ]
Yun J. [1 ,3 ]
Mao Y. [1 ,3 ]
Li B. [1 ,3 ]
Tang X. [1 ,3 ]
Cao Y. [4 ]
机构
[1] Key Laboratory of Metallurgical Equipment and Control Technology of Ministry of Education, Wuhan University of Science and Technology, Hubei, Wuhan
[2] Precision Manufacturing Research Institute, Wuhan University of Science and Technology, Hubei, Wuhan
[3] Research Centre for Biomimetic Robot and Intelligent Measurement and Control, Wuhan University of Science and Technology, Hubei, Wuhan
[4] Technology Research and Development, Hubei Jingmen Wusan Machinery Equipment Manufacturing Co., Ltd., Hubei, Jingmen
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
ANSYS workbench; cross shaft; multi-objective optimisation; sensitivity analysis;
D O I
10.1504/IJWMC.2024.137166
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Cross-universal coupling is a key component of the mechanical transmission system and the cross-shaft is the core component of the coupling for torque transmission. Under normal circumstances, cross-shafts are most susceptible to fatigue and deformation, mainly due to the large torques they carry and the irrationality of their structure. Traditional design methods rely on practical experience to determine the key dimensions of the cross-shaft, resulting in long design cycles and low reliability. To address this problem, parametric modelling of the cross-shaft is carried out in this paper and imported into ANSYS Workbench. In addition, static and finite element analyses are carried out to find the weak parts of the cross shaft as the objective function. Finally, sensitivity analysis is carried out using the main structural parameters of the cross-shaft as design variables. Based on the linear correlation matrix and sensitivity graph, the three design variables that have the greatest impact on the objective function, journal height, thickness and body length, are selected. © 2024 Inderscience Enterprises Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:207 / 214
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Optimised design of cross-shaft parameters based on response surface optimisation model with MOGA
    Xiong S.
    Xie Y.
    Zou C.
    Mao Y.
    Cao Y.
    International Journal of Wireless and Mobile Computing, 2024, 26 (02) : 198 - 206
  • [2] Lens design as multi-objective optimisation
    Joseph, Shaine
    Kang, Hyung W.
    Chakraborty, Uday K.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF AUTOMATION AND CONTROL, 2011, 5 (03) : 189 - 218
  • [3] Multi-objective optimisation of the engine connecting rod based on the response surface methodology
    Zheng B.
    Zhou L.F.
    International Journal of Computational Materials Science and Surface Engineering, 2024, 12 (01) : 14 - 35
  • [4] Multi-objective optimisation
    Bortfeld, T.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2007, 84 : S72 - S73
  • [5] Grid services for multi-objective design optimisation
    Goteng, G.
    Tiwari, A.
    Roy, R.
    CIRP JOURNAL OF MANUFACTURING SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2010, 3 (04) : 249 - 261
  • [6] Multi-objective optimisation for process design and control
    Brown, Martin
    Hutauruk, Nicky
    MEASUREMENT & CONTROL, 2007, 40 (06): : 182 - 187
  • [7] Parametric design and multi-objective optimisation of containerships
    Priftis, Alexandros
    Boulougouris, Evangelos
    Turan, Osman
    Papanikolaou, Apostolos
    OCEAN ENGINEERING, 2018, 156 : 347 - 357
  • [8] Multi-objective design optimisation for PMSLM by FITM
    Dong, Fei
    Song, Juncai
    Zhao, Jiwen
    Zhao, Jing
    IET ELECTRIC POWER APPLICATIONS, 2018, 12 (02) : 188 - 194
  • [9] Response surface methodology with prediction uncertainty: A multi-objective optimisation approach
    Chi, Guoyi
    Hu, Shuangquan
    Yang, Yanhui
    Chen, Tao
    CHEMICAL ENGINEERING RESEARCH & DESIGN, 2012, 90 (09): : 1235 - 1244
  • [10] Interval multi-objective optimisation of structures using adaptive Kriging approximations
    Li, Fangyi
    Luo, Zhen
    Rong, Jianhua
    Zhang, Nong
    COMPUTERS & STRUCTURES, 2013, 119 : 68 - 84