Trading strategy for integrated energy service provider considering carbon emission sharing

被引:0
|
作者
Gu J. [1 ]
You M. [1 ]
Wu K. [1 ]
机构
[1] Department of Electrical Engineering and Automation, School of Electronic Information and Electrical Engineering, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai
关键词
carbon emission; carbon flow tracking; cooperative game; integrated energy service provider; Nash bargaining theory; network flow method;
D O I
10.16081/j.epae.202311021
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
In order to find an effective way to reduce system carbon emission while meeting customers’energy demand,an energy trading strategy for multiple integrated energy service providers considering carbon emission sharing is proposed. Based on the network flow model,the carbon flow tracking is realized and the carbon emission cost calculation model of integrated energy service provider is established in conjunction with the Shapley theory. Furthermore,the Nash bargaining theory is applied to build a cooperative game operation model for multiple integrated energy service providers,in which the carbon emission cost is introduced into the optimization objective function,and the optimal energy trading volume and transaction cost are solved by distributed algorithm. The simulation analysis is conducted based on the multiple integrated energy service provider system with the modified IEEE 39-bus grid and 12-node gas network to verify the effectiveness of the proposed model and method. © 2024 Electric Power Automation Equipment Press. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:11 / 18
页数:7
相关论文
共 20 条
  • [1] ARENT D J, BRAGG-SITTON S M, MILLER D C, Et al., Multi-input,multi-output hybrid energy systems, Joule, 5, 1, pp. 47-58, (2021)
  • [2] CHEN Sheng, WEI Zhinong, GU Wei, Et al., Carbon neutral oriented transition and revolution of energy systems:multi-energy flow coordination technology, Electric Power Automation Equipment, 41, 9, pp. 3-12, (2021)
  • [3] WANG Y, LIU Z, CAI C, Et al., Research on the optimization method of integrated energy system operation with multi-subject game[J], Energy, 245, (2022)
  • [4] SHI Jiaqi, HU Hao, ZHANG Jianhua, Distributed low-carbon economy scheduling for integrated energy system with multiple individual energy-hubs, Power System Technology, 43, 1, pp. 127-136, (2019)
  • [5] WU Jinling, LOU Ping, GUAN Minyuan, Et al., Operation optimization strategy of multi-microgrids energy sharing based on asymmetric Nash bargaining, Power System Technology, 46, 7, pp. 2711-2723, (2022)
  • [6] CUI Mingyong, XUAN Mingyang, LU Zhigang, Et al., Operation optimization strategy of multi integrated energy service companies based on cooperative game theory, Proceedings of the CSEE, 42, 10, pp. 3548-3564, (2022)
  • [7] GU Xin, WANG Qi, HU Yunlong, Et al., Distributed low-carbon optimal operation strategy of multi-microgrids integrated energy system based on Nash bargaining, Power System Technology, 46, 4, pp. 1464-1482, (2022)
  • [8] CHATTOPADHYAY D., Modeling greenhouse gas reduction from the Australian electricity sector[J], IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 25, 2, pp. 729-740, (2010)
  • [9] LI Yaowang, ZHANG Ning, DU Ershun, Et al., Mechanism study and benefit analysis on power system low carbon demand response based on carbon emission flow, Proceedings of the CSEE, 42, 8, pp. 2830-2842, (2022)
  • [10] ZHOU Tianrui, KANG Chongqing, XU Qianyao, Et al., Preliminary investigation on a method for carbon emission flow calculation of power system, Automation of Electric Power Systems, 36, 11, pp. 44-49, (2012)