Capacity sharing platform pricing strategy considering delivery time and price sensitivity of capacity demand side

被引:0
|
作者
Zhao D.-Z. [1 ]
Feng H.-Z. [1 ]
机构
[1] College of Management and Economics, Tianjin University, Tianjin
来源
Kongzhi yu Juece/Control and Decision | 2024年 / 39卷 / 02期
关键词
capacity sharing; delivery time sensitive; platform pricing; platform profit; price sensitive; two-sided platforms;
D O I
10.13195/j.kzyjc.2022.0639
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Based on the two-sided market theory, this paper studies the pricing strategy of the monopolistic manufacturing capacity sharing platform, considering the network externality of the two-sided market and the sensitivity of the demand side to the processing delivery and price. Firstly, a two-stage decision-making model of platform and bilateral users is established, and the platform equilibrium profit under registration fee and transaction fee charging model is explored through calculation and solution, and the influence of exogenous variables such as the externality of the cross network on the decision-making and platform profit of all parties is analyzed. The results show that the platform equilibrium profit under registration fee mode is greater than that under fixed transaction fee mode. Platform profits under the two pricing models are positively correlated with the network externalities of bilateral users, negatively correlated with the expected deviation of delivery date of the demand side of capacity, and positively correlated with the expected price of capacity. When the actual delivery date is earlier or later than the expected delivery date, the sensitivity of the demand side has different influences on the platform profit. When the actual price of the demand side is lower or higher than the expected price, the sensitivity of the demand side has different influences on the platform profit. © 2024 Northeast University. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:625 / 632
页数:7
相关论文
共 20 条
  • [1] Zhao D Z, Zhang J C, Hao J Q., Formation and characteristics of sharing economy, “How sharing economy reshapes the future”, pp. 108-125, (2018)
  • [2] Annual report on China’s manufacturing capacity sharing development in 2018, (2018)
  • [3] Yu F X., Accelerate the sharing of manufacturing capacity in 2019, (2019)
  • [4] Annual report on the development of China’s sharing economy in 2022, (2022)
  • [5] Armstrong M., Competition in two-sided markets, The RAND Journal of Economics, 37, 3, pp. 668-691, (2006)
  • [6] Rochet J C, Tirole J., Platform competition in two-sided markets, Journal of the European Economic Association, 1, 4, pp. 990-1029, (2003)
  • [7] Belleflamme P, Toulemonde E., Who benefits from increased competition among sellers on B2C platforms?, Research in Economics, 70, 4, pp. 741-751, (2016)
  • [8] Lu K, Zhou J, Lin X W., Pricing research of ride-hailing platform: From the view of inter-group network externality, Operations Research and Management Science, 28, 7, pp. 169-178, (2019)
  • [9] Xue Z J, Cheng S Q, Yu M Z, Et al., Pricing models of two-sided markets incorporating service quality, Kybernetes: The International Journal of Systems and Cybernetics, 48, 8, pp. 1827-1850, (2019)
  • [10] Tang D P, Wang Q J, Ding Y N., A study on pricing strategy of two-sided markets with service differentiation, Industrial Engineering Journal, 16, 6, pp. 77-83, (2013)