An Analysis of Crosswalks from Research Data Schemas to Schema.org

被引:0
|
作者
Mingfang Wu [1 ]
Stephen MRichard [2 ]
Chantelle Verhey [3 ]
Leyla Jael Castro [4 ]
Baptiste Cecconi [5 ]
Nick Juty [6 ]
机构
[1] Australian Research Data Commons
[2] US Geoscience Information Network
[3] International Science Council, World Data System
[4] ZB MED–Information Centre for Life Sciences
[5] Observatoire de Paris-PSL, Paris Astronomical Data Center
[6] Department of Computer Science, The University of
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TP311.13 []; TP333 [存贮器];
学科分类号
1201 ;
摘要
The increased number of data repositories has greatly increased the availability of open data. To enable broad discovery and access to research dataset, some data repositories have begun leveraging the web architecture by embedding structured metadata markup in dataset web landing pages using vocabularies from Schema.org and extensions. This paper aims to examine metadata interoperability for supporting global data discovery. Specifically, the paper reports a survey on which metadata schema has been adopted by participating data repositories, and presents an analysis of crosswalks from fourteen research data schemas to Schema.org. The analysis indicates most descriptive metadata are interoperable among the schemas, the most inconsistent mapping is the rights metadata, and a large gap exists in the structural metadata and controlled vocabularies to specify various property values. The analysis and collated crosswalks can serve as a reference for data repositories when they develop crosswalks from their own schemas to Schema.org, and provide the research data community a benchmark of structured metadata implementation.
引用
收藏
页码:100 / 121
页数:22
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] An Analysis of Crosswalks from Research Data Schemas to Schema.org
    Wu, Mingfang
    Richard, Stephen M.
    Verhey, Chantelle
    Castro, Leyla Jael
    Cecconi, Baptiste
    Juty, Nick
    DATA INTELLIGENCE, 2023, 5 (01) : 100 - 121
  • [2] Schema.org: https://schema.org/
    Wong, Elise Y.
    Technical Services Quarterly, 2015, 32 (02) : 229 - 230
  • [3] Analyzing Schema.org
    Patel-Schneider, Peter F.
    SEMANTIC WEB - ISWC 2014, PT I, 2014, 8796 : 261 - 276
  • [4] Schema.org: Evolution of Structured Data on the Web
    Guha, R.V.
    Brickley, Dan
    MacBeth, Steve
    Queue, 2015, 13 (09):
  • [5] Schema.org: Evolution of Structured Data on the Web
    Guha, R. V.
    Brickley, Dan
    Macbeth, Steve
    COMMUNICATIONS OF THE ACM, 2016, 59 (02) : 44 - 51
  • [6] Schema.org as a Description Logic
    Hernich, Andre
    Lutz, Carsten
    Ozaki, Ana
    Wolter, Frank
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE TWENTY-FOURTH INTERNATIONAL JOINT CONFERENCE ON ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE (IJCAI), 2015, : 3048 - 3054
  • [7] Schema.org for digital catalogs
    Ferreira Machado, Dayane Onaga
    Simionato Arakaki, Ana Carolina
    ENCONTROS BIBLI-REVISTA ELETRONICA DE BIBLIOTECONOMIA E CIENCIA DA INFORMACAO, 2022, 27
  • [8] The Web Data Commons Schema.org Data Set Series
    Brinkmann, Alexander
    Primpeli, Anna
    Bizer, Christian
    COMPANION OF THE WORLD WIDE WEB CONFERENCE, WWW 2023, 2023, : 136 - 139
  • [9] Validator and Preview for the JobPosting Data Model of Schema.org
    Mynarz, Jindrich
    E-COMMERCE AND WEBTECHNOLOGIES, 2014, 188 : 58 - 63
  • [10] Providing Research Graph Data in JSON']JSON-LD Using Schema.org
    Wang, Jingbo
    Aryani, Amir
    Wyborn, Lesley
    Evans, Ben
    WWW'17 COMPANION: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 26TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON WORLD WIDE WEB, 2017, : 1213 - 1218