Process selection with multiple objective and subjective attributes

被引:0
|
作者
Parkan, Celik [1 ]
Wu, Ming-Lu [1 ]
机构
[1] City Univ of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
来源
Production Planning and Control | 1998年 / 9卷 / 02期
关键词
Competition - Cost effectiveness - Decision making - Manufacture - Strategic planning;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
In the manufacturing sector, process selection is an important strategic consideration for improving competitiveness. We propose two simple and effective methods for process selection. After providing a detailed description of the general process selection problem with particular emphasis on attribute types, objective attribute values, subjective ratings and importance weights, we review an existing Multiple-Attribute Decision Making (MADM) method called TOPSIS, a Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (alternative) and describe briefly an operational performance measurement procedure called Operational Competitiveness RAting (OCRA). We show that these two methods are both distance based and strongly interrelated, and that they can be used for process selection decisions as well as operational performance measurement. Focusing on process selection, we demonstrate in detail the two methods' application and interrelationship through two examples. The selection decision in the examples is made on the basis of objective values of the attributes and their subjective ratings.
引用
收藏
页码:189 / 200
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Process selection with multiple objective and subjective attributes
    Parkan, C
    Wu, ML
    PRODUCTION PLANNING & CONTROL, 1998, 9 (02) : 189 - 200
  • [2] Selection of a manufacturing process with multiple benefit attributes
    Parkan, C
    Wu, ML
    IEMC 96 PROCEEDINGS - MANAGING VIRTUAL ENTERPRISES: A CONVERGENCE OF COMMUNICATIONS, COMPUTING, AND ENERGY TECHNOLOGIES, 1996, : 447 - 452
  • [3] Selection of a manufacturing process with multiple attributes: A case study
    Chau, OL
    Parkan, C
    JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY MANAGEMENT, 1995, 12 (03) : 219 - 237
  • [4] SOME REMARKS ON OBJECTIVE AND SUBJECTIVE INTERPRETATIONS OF ATTRIBUTES
    JARRETT, CE
    INQUIRY-AN INTERDISCIPLINARY JOURNAL OF PHILOSOPHY, 1977, 20 (04): : 447 - 456
  • [5] A subjective and objective integrated multiple attribute decision making method for material selection
    Rao, R. V.
    Patel, B. K.
    MATERIALS & DESIGN, 2010, 31 (10) : 4738 - 4747
  • [6] Fuzzy Reasoning for Medical Diagnosis based on Subjective Attributes and Objective Attributes Alignment
    Fujita, Hamido
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2013 JOINT IFSA WORLD CONGRESS AND NAFIPS ANNUAL MEETING (IFSA/NAFIPS), 2013, : 950 - 955
  • [7] Objective and subjective foundations for multiple priors
    Stinchcombe, Maxwell B.
    JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC THEORY, 2016, 165 : 263 - 291
  • [8] Learning Personalized Image Aesthetics From Subjective and Objective Attributes
    Zhu, Hancheng
    Zhou, Yong
    Li, Leida
    Li, Yaqian
    Guo, Yandong
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON MULTIMEDIA, 2023, 25 : 179 - 190
  • [9] The method of combining subjective with objective weight in multiple objective decisions
    Zhang, CQ
    Wang, T
    Liu, AF
    FOURTH WUHAN INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON E-BUSINESS: THE INTERNET ERA & THE GLOBAL ENTERPRISE, VOLS 1 AND 2, 2005, : 1674 - 1678
  • [10] COMPETITION - AN OBJECTIVE SELECTION PROCESS
    SHERWIN, JA
    TRANSFUSION, 1980, 20 (05) : 610 - 611