Comparison of different forest regeneration methods after windthrow

被引:1
|
作者
Martiník, A. [1 ]
Dobrovolný, L. [1 ]
Hurt, V. [1 ]
机构
[1] Department of Silviculture, Faculty of Forestry and Wood Technology, Mendel University in Brno, Zemědělská 3, 613 00 Brno, Czech Republic
关键词
Seed - Population distribution;
D O I
10.17221/66/2013-jfs
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The prosperity of various forest regeneration methods was evaluated on the prepared windthrow area established in 2010 in a previously allochthonous coniferous stand growing in mid-elevations of the Czech Republic. The forest regeneration variants were as follows: (1) planting of target species (Picea abies [L.] Karst.) and Fagus sylvatica (L.), (2) seeding of pioneer (non target) species (Betula pendula Roth) and (3) spontaneous succession. Two years after windthrow the planting was evaluated in accordance with the Czech forestry law as regeneration method with sufficient attributes, density (6,000-9,000 indd·ha-1) and regular spatial distribution of target tree species. The seeding and succession variants showed a insufficient attributes of target tree species - total density ca 3,000 indd·ha-1 (being ca 1,000 indd·ha-1 higher than 20 cm) and irregular distribution across the plot. The nontarget species birch on the seeding variant showed a high density of plants (131,000 indd·ha-1) being eight times higher than the succession variant. The cost of the regeneration treatment was different between the variants - planting: 5,000-6,000 EUR·ha-1, 1,300 EUR·ha-1, succession: 1,000 EUR·ha-1. Comparing to planting the higher diversity of tree species and higher density of non-target species (20,000-134,000 EUR·ha-1) in the seeding and succession variants promise success for the future, however the real potential of regeneration methods that were used will be clear after long-term observations.
引用
收藏
页码:190 / 197
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] MICROSITE AND ELEVATIONAL INFLUENCES ON EARLY FOREST REGENERATION AFTER CATASTROPHIC WINDTHROW
    PETERSON, CJ
    PICKETT, STA
    [J]. JOURNAL OF VEGETATION SCIENCE, 1990, 1 (05) : 657 - 662
  • [2] Soil and forest regeneration after different extraction methods in coppice forests
    Venanzi, Rachele
    Picchio, Rodolfo
    Grigolato, Stefano
    Latterini, Francesco
    [J]. FOREST ECOLOGY AND MANAGEMENT, 2019, 454
  • [3] Limited salvage logging effects on forest regeneration after moderate-severity windthrow
    Peterson, Chris J.
    Leach, Andrea D.
    [J]. ECOLOGICAL APPLICATIONS, 2008, 18 (02) : 407 - 420
  • [4] Western Carpathian mountain spruce forest after a windthrow: Natural regeneration in cleared and uncleared areas
    Jonasova, M.
    Vavrova, E.
    Cudlin, P.
    [J]. FOREST ECOLOGY AND MANAGEMENT, 2010, 259 (06) : 1127 - 1134
  • [5] Long-term data on forest regeneration after catastrophic windthrow in Tomakomai, Hokkaido, northern Japan
    Ito, Hiroki
    Seki, Takeshi
    Tsuyama, Ikutaro
    Iida, Shigeo
    [J]. ECOLOGICAL RESEARCH, 2018, 33 (02) : 283 - 283
  • [6] REGENERATION AND GROWTH AFTER CUTTING OF DIFFERENT FOREST TYPES
    PFALZGRA.J
    [J]. PULP AND PAPER MAGAZINE OF CANADA, 1970, 71 (07): : 51 - &
  • [7] The influence of windthrow microsites on tree regeneration and establishment in an old growth mountain forest
    Simon, Alois
    Gratzer, Georg
    Sieghardt, Monika
    [J]. FOREST ECOLOGY AND MANAGEMENT, 2011, 262 (07) : 1289 - 1297
  • [8] Forest structural attributes after windthrow and consequences of salvage logging
    Waldron, Kaysandra
    Rue, Jean-Claude
    Gauthier, Sylvie
    [J]. FOREST ECOLOGY AND MANAGEMENT, 2013, 289 : 28 - 37
  • [9] Long-term effects of different forest regeneration methods on mature forest birds
    Perry, Roger W.
    Jenkins, Julianna M. A.
    Thill, Ronald E.
    Thompson, Frank R., III
    [J]. FOREST ECOLOGY AND MANAGEMENT, 2018, 408 : 183 - 194
  • [10] Albumin regeneration in liver support - Comparison of different methods
    Mitzner, S
    Klammt, S
    Stange, J
    Schmidt, R
    [J]. THERAPEUTIC APHERESIS AND DIALYSIS, 2006, 10 (02) : 108 - 117