Vortex Induced Vibration and Aerodynamic Characteristics of Flat Streamline Box Girder

被引:0
|
作者
Ren R. [1 ]
Liu Q. [2 ,3 ,4 ]
Li Z. [2 ]
Sun Y. [2 ]
Jing H. [2 ,3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Hebei Branch of China Nuclear Power Engineering Co.,Ltd, Shijiazhuang
[2] School of Civil Engineering, Shijiazhuang Tiedao University, Shijiazhuang
[3] State Key Laboratory of Mechanical Behavior and System Safety of Traffic Engineering Structures, Shijiazhuang Tiedao University, Shijiazhuang
[4] Innovation Center for Wind Engineering and Wind Energy Technology of Hebei Province, Shijiazhuang
关键词
aero⁃ dynamic force coefficient; pressure coefficient; quasi-streamline box girder; vortex induced vibration; wind tunnel test;
D O I
10.16450/j.cnki.issn.1004-6801.2023.03.021
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
In order to find out the influence of the attached components on the vortex induced vibration and aerody⁃ namic characteristics of flat streamlined box girder,the main girder of a quasi streamlined bridge is selected as the research object. By increasing or decreasing the attached components of the model to simulate the bare beam and non bare beam sections,the wind tunnel pressure and vibration tests are carried out under different wind attack an⁃ gles. The results show that the vortex induced vibration characteristics of the flat streamlined box girder are greatly affected by the auxiliary components of the model,and the railing section is more prone to vortex induced vibration at the positive angle of attack. At the same angle of attack and wind speed,there is a more obvious predominant fre⁃ quency of the railing section,which indicates that the attached components of the model will have a greater impact on the vortex shedding of the flat streamlined box girder. The average wind pressure coefficient of flat streamlined box girder is greatly affected by the model section,but the fluctuating wind pressure coefficient is affected by the model section and wind attack angle. Different model sections will affect the average three component force coeffi⁃ cient of flat streamlined box girder,but its variation trend is mainly related to the wind attack angle. © 2023 Nanjing University of Aeronautics an Astronautics. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:572 / 577and624
相关论文
共 10 条
  • [1] FUJINO Y,, YOSHIDA Y., Wind-induced vibration and control of Trans-Tokyo Bay crossing bridge[J], Journal of Structural Engineering, 128, 8, pp. 1012-1025, (2002)
  • [2] PFEIL M S., Reduction of vortex-induced oscillations of Rio⁃Niterói bridge by dynamic control devices[J], Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 84, 3, pp. 273-288, (2000)
  • [3] (2005)
  • [4] LAROSE G L,, LIVESEY F M., Performance of streamlined bridge decks in relation to the aerodynamics of a flat plate[J], Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 69, pp. 851-860, (1997)
  • [5] WANG Qi, LIAO Haili, LI Mingshui, Et al., Influence of aerodynamic shape of streamline box girderon bridge flutter and vortex-induced vibration[J], Journal of High⁃ way and Transportation Research and Development, 29, 8, pp. 44-50, (2012)
  • [6] GUAN Qinghai, LI Jiawu, HU Zhaotong, Study on the Influence of railing on vortex-induced vibration of typical bridge section[J], Journal of Vibration and Shock, 33, 3, pp. 150-156, (2014)
  • [7] ZGANG Liangliang, WU Bo, YANG Yang, Et al., Ef⁃ fects of subsidiary members and deck surface roughness on the coefficients of static forces on a flat box gird⁃ er [J], Journal of Experiments in Fluid Mechanics, 30, 1, pp. 74-80, (2016)
  • [8] Improving the aerodynamic performance of Vila-Real Bridge deck-section[J], Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 156, pp. 72-83, (2016)
  • [9] YUAN Liangdong, GE Xiaomeng, Investigations on the static aerodynamic performanc of steel truss girder suspension bridge[J], Northern Communications, 4, pp. 9-11, (2016)
  • [10] LI Jiawu, SONG Te, LIN Lihua, Et al., Study on aero⁃ dynamic performance of a continuous steel box girder bridge with variable sections[J], Journal of Highway and Transportation Research and Development, 37, 4, pp. 88-95, (2020)