Dynamic resilience assessment and multi-objective optimization decision-making for urban roadway tunnel system in the face of fire disaster

被引:0
|
作者
Sun, Honglei [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Lan, Huijun [1 ]
He, Zili [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Pan, Xiaodong [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Zhang, Ranran [1 ]
Zhang, Pengfei [4 ]
Tong, Junhao [5 ]
机构
[1] Zhejiang Univ Technol, Coll Civil Engn, Hangzhou 310014, Peoples R China
[2] Zhejiang Prov Key Lab Engn Struct & Disaster Preve, Hangzhou 310014, Peoples R China
[3] Minist Educ Renewable Energy Infrastruct Construct, Engn Res Ctr, Hangzhou 310014, Peoples R China
[4] CCCC Highway Consultants CO Ltd, Beijing 100088, Peoples R China
[5] Zhejiang Sci Res Inst Transport, Bridge & Tunnel Res Inst, Hangzhou 310023, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Fire disaster; Resilience; Urban roadway tunnel system; Multi-state dynamic Bayesian network; Noisy-Max; Multi-objective optimization; RISK-ASSESSMENT; SAFETY; PREDICTION; FRAMEWORK;
D O I
10.1016/j.tust.2024.106120
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
The urban roadway tunnel system (URTS), as an infrastructure system that includes equipment and facilities, operational staff, and traffic participants, faces challenges arising from various potential fire threats. Existing studies on tunnel fire risk primarily focus on static assessment, neglecting dynamic changes over time, and insufficiently considering the complexity of tunnel composition, leading to incomplete identification of influential factors. Additionally, few studies were conducted to develop optimal operation and maintenance (O&M) strategies under cost constraints. To bolster fire safety management of URTS, a fire framework that combines resilience assessment and optimization is proposed based on system resilience theory, Bayesian network (BN), and multi-objective optimization (MOPT) in this paper. The framework is applied to Hangzhou's URTS. The results indicate that Hangzhou's URTS has a current "Medium" fire resilience level of 0.640, decreasing to 0.568 in 20 years without scientific O&M. The static and dynamic strategies are acquired through sensitivity and critical importance analysis, enhancing long-term fire resilience. Moreover, optimal strategies for varied investments in diverse periods are explored, considering O&M costs and resilience levels. The fire resilience framework introduced herein can integrate into various infrastructure systems, effectively enhancing disaster resilience and promoting sustainable development.
引用
收藏
页数:34
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Fuzzy multi-objective optimization decision-making of reliability of series system
    Huang, HZ
    MICROELECTRONICS AND RELIABILITY, 1997, 37 (03): : 447 - 449
  • [2] Multi-Objective Optimization and Decision-Making in Context Steering
    Dockhorn, Alexander
    Mostaghim, Sanaz
    Kirst, Martin
    Zettwitz, Martin
    2021 IEEE CONFERENCE ON GAMES (COG), 2021, : 308 - 315
  • [3] Towards Many-Objective Optimization: Objective Analysis, Multi-Objective Optimization and Decision-Making
    Zheng, J. H.
    Kou, Y. N.
    Jing, Z. X.
    Wu, Q. H.
    IEEE ACCESS, 2019, 7 : 93742 - 93751
  • [4] A multi-objective decision-making framework for implementing green-grey infrastructures to enhance urban drainage system resilience
    Tansar, Husnain
    Duan, Huan-Feng
    Mark, Ole
    JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 2023, 620
  • [5] Multi-Objective Optimization Algorithm and Preference Multi-Objective Decision-Making Based on Artificial Intelligence Biological Immune System
    Bao, Juan
    Liu, Xiangyang
    Xiang, Zhengtao
    Wei, Gang
    IEEE ACCESS, 2020, 8 : 160221 - 160230
  • [6] Study of Multi-objective Optimization and Multi-attribute Decision-making for Dynamic Economic Emission Dispatch
    Li Xuebin
    ELECTRIC POWER COMPONENTS AND SYSTEMS, 2009, 37 (10) : 1133 - 1148
  • [7] An integrated multi-objective optimization, evaluation, and decision-making method for ship energy system
    Wu, Nianyuan
    Zhang, Fang
    Zhang, Fuzheng
    Jiang, Chenxing
    Lin, Jian
    Xie, Shan
    Jing, Rui
    Zhao, Yingru
    APPLIED ENERGY, 2024, 373
  • [9] MULTI-OBJECTIVE DECISION-MAKING IN WATER-RESOURCE SYSTEM
    NATCHKOV, IG
    SYSTEMS ANALYSIS MODELLING SIMULATION, 1988, 5 (01): : 43 - 50
  • [10] Integrating machine learning with dynamic multi-objective optimization for real-time decision-making
    Sarkar, Puja
    Khanapuri, Vivekanand B.
    Tiwari, Manoj Kumar
    INFORMATION SCIENCES, 2025, 690