Assessment of mobility decarbonization with carbon tax policies and electric vehicle incentives in the U.S.

被引:0
|
作者
Pan, Weijie [1 ]
Shittu, Ekundayo [1 ]
机构
[1] Department of Engineering Management and Systems Engineering, The George Washington University, Washington, DC,20052, United States
关键词
Electrification;
D O I
10.1016/j.apenergy.2024.124838
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
On-road transportation electrification shows a significant stride toward achieving the low-carbon emission targets in the United States. Similarly, decarbonizing electricity generation technologies is crucial to prevent the transfer of CO2 emissions from the transportation sector to the power generation sector. The realization of nationwide emission mitigation goals undoubtedly depends on collaborative efforts from all U.S. states. However, in the presence of heterogeneous low-carbon policies, the state-level decarbonization landscape, which includes the electric vehicle (EV) adoption process and the choice of local renewable portfolios, blurs the national-level path toward the decarbonization target from a long-term planning perspective. To address this knowledge gap, this study employs an Integrated Assessment Model (IAM), specifically GCAM-USA, which is a state-level representation of the U.S. energy system embedded within the Global Change Analysis Model (GCAM). The aim is to present a blueprint illustrating how the U.S. decarbonization process is influenced by differentiated state-level EV purchase incentives and/or carbon tax policies. The modeling results reveal a heightened sensitivity of the effectiveness of decarbonization in midwestern states to the implementation of various low-carbon strategies, leading to a proposal to establish an interstate collaborative energy strategy for electricity generation in the face of the emerging era of electrified transportation. The insights derived from this study can contribute to raising awareness among federal and state policymakers about the importance of tailored state strategies for decarbonization while simultaneously striving to facilitate the harmonization of national-level progress in achieving climate goals. © 2024 Elsevier Ltd
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The Interplay of Incentives, Electricity Price and Demand on Transport Decarbonization: The Case of Electric Vehicles in the U.S.
    Wang T.
    Deason J.
    Shittu E.
    [J]. IEEE Engineering Management Review, 2024, 52 (02): : 1 - 17
  • [2] Effectiveness of Severance Tax Incentives in the U.S. Oil Industry
    Mitch Kunce
    [J]. International Tax and Public Finance, 2003, 10 : 565 - 587
  • [3] U.S. CARBON TAX SCENARIOS AND BIOENERGY
    Sands, Ronald D.
    [J]. CLIMATE CHANGE ECONOMICS, 2018, 9 (01)
  • [4] Data on U.S. state-level electric vehicle policies, 2010-2015
    Wee, Sherilyn
    Coffman, Makena
    La Croix, Sumner
    [J]. DATA IN BRIEF, 2019, 23
  • [5] THE ROLE OF BORDER CARBON ADJUSTMENTS IN A U.S. CARBON TAX
    McKibbin, Warwick J.
    Morris, Adele C.
    Wilcoxen, Peter J.
    Liu, Weifeng
    [J]. CLIMATE CHANGE ECONOMICS, 2018, 9 (01)
  • [6] Inequality and the future of electric mobility in 36 U.S. Cities: An innovative methodology and comparative assessment
    Romero-Lankao, Patricia
    Wilson, Alana
    Zimny-Schmitt, Daniel
    [J]. ENERGY RESEARCH & SOCIAL SCIENCE, 2022, 91
  • [7] An Assessment of the Economic Effects of the Menu of U.S. Trade Policies
    Kiyota, Kozo
    Stern, Robert M.
    [J]. GLOBAL ECONOMY JOURNAL, 2005, 5 (04):
  • [8] Decarbonization potential of electrifying 50% of U.S. light-duty vehicle sales by 2030
    Maxwell Woody
    Gregory A. Keoleian
    Parth Vaishnav
    [J]. Nature Communications, 14
  • [9] OVERVIEW OF THE EMF 32 STUDY ON U.S. CARBON TAX SCENARIOS
    McFarland, James R.
    Fawcett, Allen A.
    Morris, Adele C.
    Reilly, John M.
    Wilcoxen, Peter J.
    [J]. CLIMATE CHANGE ECONOMICS, 2018, 9 (01)
  • [10] INTRODUCTION TO THE EMF 32 STUDY ON U.S. CARBON TAX SCENARIOS
    Fawcett, Allen A.
    McFarland, James R.
    Morris, Adele C.
    Weyant, John P.
    [J]. CLIMATE CHANGE ECONOMICS, 2018, 9 (01)