An improved approximate dynamic programming and its application in SVC control

被引:0
|
作者
Sun, Jian [1 ]
Liu, Feng [1 ]
Si, Jennie [2 ]
Guo, Wen-Tao [1 ]
Mei, Sheng-Wei [1 ]
机构
[1] State Key Laboratory of Power System, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China
[2] Department of Electrical Engineering, Arizona State University, Tempe 85287-5706, United States
关键词
Cost functions - Dynamic programming - Controllers - Value engineering - Electric control equipment - State feedback - Proportional control systems - Three term control systems;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The main idea of approximate dynamic programming (ADP) is approximately computing cost function to avoid the curse of dimension. However, it needs many times learning to converge due to the randomly choosing initial weights. So it is greatly limited in the application. This paper presents a direct heuristic dynamic programming (DHDP) based on an improved proportion integration differentiation PID neural network (IPIDNN). This method constructs an equivalent between the initial action network and PID controller. Therefore, well-designed PID controller can guide the initial weights choosing, so that the convergence of this algorithm will be remarkably improved. Moreover, compared with the traditional PID neural network, the configuration of IPIDNN is flexible and easy to expand, as well as a better robust performance. The simulation results show the validity of this algorithm and initial weights choosing method by the static var compensator (SVC) supplementary control in four-machine two-area system. It also has a good performance in the circumstance of partial state feedback and state delay.
引用
收藏
页码:95 / 102
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Approximate Dynamic Programming Based Controller Design Using an Improved Learning Algorithm with Application to Tracking Control of Aircraft
    Luo, Xiong
    Zhou, Yuchao
    Sun, Zengqi
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF 2013 CHINESE INTELLIGENT AUTOMATION CONFERENCE: INTELLIGENT AUTOMATION & INTELLIGENT TECHNOLOGY AND SYSTEMS, 2013, 255 : 141 - 148
  • [2] Revisiting Approximate Dynamic Programming and its Convergence
    Heydari, Ali
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON CYBERNETICS, 2014, 44 (12) : 2733 - 2743
  • [3] Approximate dynamic programming approach for process control
    Lee, Jay H.
    Wong, Weechin
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PROCESS CONTROL, 2010, 20 (09) : 1038 - 1048
  • [4] Approximate dynamic programming for ship course control
    Bai, Xuerui
    Yi, Jianqiang
    Zhao, Dongbin
    [J]. ADVANCES IN NEURAL NETWORKS - ISNN 2007, PT 1, PROCEEDINGS, 2007, 4491 : 349 - +
  • [5] Approximate dynamic programming approach for process control
    Lee, Jay H.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON CONTROL, AUTOMATION AND SYSTEMS (ICCAS 2010), 2010, : 459 - 464
  • [6] Approximate Dynamic Programming for Output Feedback Control
    Jiang Yu
    Jiang Zhong-Ping
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 29TH CHINESE CONTROL CONFERENCE, 2010, : 5815 - 5820
  • [7] An application of convex optimization concepts to approximate dynamic programming
    Arruda, Edilson F.
    Fragoso, Marcelo D.
    do Val, Joao Bosco R.
    [J]. 2008 AMERICAN CONTROL CONFERENCE, VOLS 1-12, 2008, : 4238 - +
  • [8] Nonlinear Control of Quadcopters via Approximate Dynamic Programming
    Romero, Angel
    Beuchat, Paul N.
    Sturz, Yvonne R.
    Smith, Roy S.
    Lygeros, John
    [J]. 2019 18TH EUROPEAN CONTROL CONFERENCE (ECC), 2019, : 3752 - 3759
  • [9] Approximate Dynamic Programming for Self-Learning Control
    Derong Liu (Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering
    [J]. 自动化学报, 2005, (01) : 13 - 18
  • [10] Shared Control of Human and Robot by Approximate Dynamic Programming
    Li, Yanan
    Tee, Keng Peng
    Yan, Rui
    Limbu, Dilip Kumar
    Ge, Shuzhi Sam
    [J]. 2015 AMERICAN CONTROL CONFERENCE (ACC), 2015, : 1167 - 1172