Quantitative Assessment of the Impact of Climate Change on the Growing Season of Vegetation Gross Primary Productivity in the Middle and Lower Reaches of the Yangtze River

被引：0
|
作者：
Xu Y. [1 ,2 ]
Pan Y.-C. [1 ]
Zou B. [2 ]
Zheng Z.-W. [1 ]
Guo Z.-D. [1 ]
机构：
[1] College of Geomatics and Geoinformation, Guilin University of Technology, Guilin
[2] School of Geosciences and Info-physics, Central South University, Changsha
来源：
Huanjing Kexue/Environmental Science | 2024年 / 45卷 / 03期
关键词：
climate factor; different vegetation types; direct effect; gross primary productivity; growing season; indirect effect; path analysis;
D O I：
10.13227/j.hjkx.202304152
中图分类号：
学科分类号：
摘要：
Quantitatively determining the direct，indirect，and comprehensive effects of climatic factors on the growing season of the vegetation GPP（GPPGS）in the middle and lower reaches of the Yangtze River at the regional and vegetation type scales can provide a scientific basis for the management and restoration of regional vegetation resources under the background of global climate change. Using MODIS GPP data，meteorological data，and vegetation type data，combined with Theil-Sen Median trend analysis and the Mann-Kendall significance test，the spatiotemporal characteristics of the GPPGS in the middle and lower reaches of the Yangtze River were investigated at different temporal and spatial scales. Path analysis was used to further reveal the direct，indirect，and comprehensive effects of climate factors on GPPGS variation in different vegetation types. The results showed that：① from 2000 to 2021，the vegetation GPPGS in the middle and lower reaches of the Yangtze River showed a fluctuating upward trend，with a rising rate（in terms of C，same below）of 2. 70 g·（m2·a）−1（P<0. 01）. The GPPGS of different vegetation types all showed a significant upward trend（P<0. 01），with shrubs having the highest upward rate of 3. 31 g·（m2·a）−1 and cultivated vegetation having the lowest upward rate of 2. 54 g·（m2·a）−1. ② The proportion of the area with an upward trend in GPPGS in the middle and lower reaches of the Yangtze River was 88. 11%. The proportion of the area with an upward trend in GPPGS was greater than 84% for all different vegetation types，with shrubs（49. 76%）and cultivated vegetation （44. 36%）having significantly higher proportions of the area with an upward trend than that in other vegetation types. ③ The path analysis results showed that precipitation and the maximum temperature had a significant positive direct effect on vegetation GPPGS（P<0. 05），whereas solar radiation had a non-significant positive effect（P≥0. 05）. The indirect effects of maximum temperature，precipitation，and solar radiation on vegetation GPPGS were all non-significantly negative（P≥0. 05）. Under the combined effects of direct and indirect influences，precipitation and maximum temperature had a non-significant positive effect on vegetation GPPGS（P≥0. 05），whereas solar radiation had a non-significant negative effect on vegetation GPPGS（P≥0. 05）. Among different vegetation types，precipitation was the main climate factor affecting the changes in GPPGS of cultivated vegetation，whereas the maximum temperature was the main climate factor affecting the changes in GPPGS of coniferous forests，broad-leaved forests，shrubs，and grasslands. ④ The changes in vegetation GPPGS in the middle and lower reaches of the Yangtze River were mainly influenced by the direct effects of maximum temperature，precipitation，and solar radiation，with the direct effect of precipitation dominating 56. 72% of the changes in GPPGS. The research results can provide a reference for quantifying the carbon sequestration potential of vegetation in the middle and lower reaches of the Yangtze River and formulating ecological restoration governance policies tailored to local conditions under the background of global climate change. © 2024 Science Press. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码：1615 / 1628
页数：13
相关论文
共 52 条
  • [1] Zhang Y C，, Piao S L，, Sun Y，, Et al., Future reversal of warming-enhanced vegetation productivity in the Northern Hemisphere［J］, Nature Climate Change, 12, 6, pp. 581-586, (2022)
  • [2] Huang K，, Xia J Y, Wang Y P，, Et al., Enhanced peak growth of global vegetation and its key mechanisms［J］, Nature Ecology & Evolution, 2, 12, pp. 1897-1905, (2018)
  • [3] Xu C G，, McDowell N G，, Fisher R A，, Et al., Increasing impacts of extreme droughts on vegetation productivity under climate change ［J］, Nature Climate Change, 9, 12, pp. 948-953, (2019)
  • [4] Yao J Y，, Liu H P，, Huang J P，, Et al., Accelerated dryland expansion regulates future variability in dryland gross primary production［J］, Nature Communications, 11, 1, (2020)
  • [5] Schenuit F., Staging science：Dramaturgical politics of the IPCC s special report on 1. 5 C［J］, Environmental Science & Policy, 139, pp. 166-176, (2023)
  • [6] Ding J Z，, Wang T, Wang Y Y，, Et al., New understanding of the response of permafrost carbon cycling to climate warming［J］, Science Bulletin, 67, 13, pp. 1322-1325, (2022)
  • [7] Xu Y，, Zhao C，, Guo Z D，, Et al., Spatio-temporal variation of gross primary productivity and synergistic mechanism of influencing factors in the eight economic zones， China ［J］, China Environmental Science, 43, 1, pp. 477-487, (2023)
  • [8] Yuan M S, Zhu Q A, Et al., Global response of terrestrial gross primary productivity to climate extremes［J］, Science of the Total Environment, (2021)
  • [9] Wang Y H, Xiao J F，, Li X，, Et al., Global evidence on the asymmetric response of gross primary productivity to interannual precipitation changes［J］, Science of the Total Environment, (2022)
  • [10] Liu Y, Et al., Quantifying the contributions of climate change and human activities to vegetation dynamic in China based on multiple indices［J］, Science of the Total Environment, (2022)
123456