Detection, location, and source mechanism determination with large noise variations in surface microseismic monitoring

被引:0
|
作者
Alexandrov D. [1 ]
Eisner L. [1 ]
Waheed U.B. [2 ,4 ]
Kaka S.I. [3 ]
Greenhalgh S.A. [2 ,4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Seismik S.r.o., Prague
[2] King Fahd University of Petroleum and Minerals, Department of Geosciences, Dhahran
[3] King Fahd University of Petroleum and Minerals, College of Petroleum Engineering and Geosciences, Dhahran
[4] King Fahd University of Petroleum and Minerals, Department of Geosciences, Dhahran
[5] Institute of Geophysics Eth Zurich, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology, Zurich
来源
Alexandrov, Dmitry (dmitry.alexandrov@seimik.cz) | 1600年 / Society of Exploration Geophysicists卷 / 85期
关键词
microseismic; noise; stacking;
D O I
10.1190/geo2019-0841.1
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Microseismic monitoring aims at detecting as weak events as possible and providing reliable locations and source mechanisms for these events. Surface monitoring arrays suffer from significant variations of noise levels across receiver lines. When using a large monitoring array, we use a stacking technique to detect microseismic events through maximizing the signal-to-noise ratio (S/N) of the stack. But some receivers with a high noise level do not contribute to improving the S/N of the stack. We have derived a theoretical concept for the proper selection of receivers that best contribute to the stack for a constant strength of a signal across the array. This receiver selection criterion, based on the assumption of constant signal amplitude, provides a robust estimate of the noise threshold level, which could be used to discard or suppress contribution from the receivers that do not improve the S/N of the stack. We found that limiting the number of receivers for stacking improves the location accuracy and reduces the computational cost of data processing. Although the assumption of a constant signal never holds in real-life seismic applications, the noise level varies across the surface receivers in a significantly wider range than the signal amplitude. These noise variations can also increase the uncertainty of the source mechanism inversion and should be accounted for. Synthetic and field data examples show that weighted least-squares inversion with receiver weighting according to the noise level produces more accurate estimates for source mechanisms compared to the inversion that ignores information about noise. © 2020 Society of Exploration Geophysicists.
引用
收藏
页码:KS197 / KS206
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Detection, location, and source mechanism determination with large noise variations in surface microseismic monitoring
    Alexandrov, Dmitry
    Eisner, Leo
    bin Waheed, Umair
    Kaka, SanLinn I.
    Greenhalgh, Stewart Alan
    GEOPHYSICS, 2020, 85 (06) : KS197 - KS206
  • [2] Effects of microseismic station location on source location accuracy in microseismic monitoring
    Wang Hai Tao
    Li Wen Xue
    Yan Ping
    Gu Jing
    PROGRESS IN INDUSTRIAL AND CIVIL ENGINEERING III, PT 1, 2014, 638-640 : 1789 - +
  • [3] Passive surface microseismic monitoring as a statistical problem: location of weak microseismic signals in the presence of strongly correlated noise
    Kushnir, Alexander
    Varypaev, Alexander
    Dricker, Ilya
    Rozhkov, Mikhail
    Rozhkov, Nikita
    GEOPHYSICAL PROSPECTING, 2014, 62 (04) : 819 - 833
  • [4] Relative source location using a local equivalent path strategy for surface microseismic monitoring
    Jiang, Yongyong
    Wang, Runqiu
    Chen, Xiaoqing
    Chu, Fangdong
    Yin, Chen
    GEOPHYSICAL JOURNAL INTERNATIONAL, 2019, 216 (02) : 1233 - 1244
  • [5] Focal mechanism determination by location-constrained deep learning: Application to microseismic monitoring
    Tian, Xiao
    Chen, Yichong
    Zhang, Xiong
    Zhang, Wei
    Wang, Xiangteng
    GEOPHYSICS, 2025, 90 (02) : L31 - L42
  • [6] Microseismic event detection Kalman filter: Derivation of the noise covariance matrix and automated first break determination for accurate source location estimation
    Baziw, E
    Nedilko, B
    Weir-Jones, I
    PURE AND APPLIED GEOPHYSICS, 2004, 161 (02) : 303 - 329
  • [7] Microseismic Event Detection Kalman Filter: Derivation of the Noise Covariance Matrix and Automated First Break Determination for Accurate Source Location Estimation
    Erick Baziw
    Bohdan Nedilko
    Iain Weir-Jones
    pure and applied geophysics, 2004, 161 : 303 - 329
  • [8] IMPROVED DETERMINATION OF MICROSEISMIC SOURCE LOCATION USING A SIMPLEX TECHNIQUE
    VANCE, JB
    HASSANI, FP
    MOTTAHED, P
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON INDUSTRY APPLICATIONS, 1988, 24 (04) : 666 - 671
  • [9] The Mechanism and Effect of Seismic Source Location Using Double Waves in Three-Dimensional Microseismic Monitoring
    Wang, Zhigang
    Wang, Xiaoqing
    Yin, Shunlin
    Ge, Maochen
    Journal of Engineering Science and Technology Review, 2024, 17 (04) : 220 - 227
  • [10] Simultaneous microseismic event localization and source mechanism determination
    Zhebel, Oksana
    Eisner, Leo
    GEOPHYSICS, 2015, 80 (01) : KS1 - KS9