Study on the Composite Performance of Sandwich Wall Panels with SGCCs

被引:2
|
作者
Jiang, Huanzhi [1 ]
Xie, Libo [1 ]
Chang, Fengyuan [1 ]
Cao, Yu [1 ]
Guo, Zhengxing [2 ]
机构
[1] Qingdao Univ Technol, Sch Civil Engn, Qingdao 266520, Peoples R China
[2] Southeast Univ, Sch Civil Engn, Nanjing 210096, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
sandwich wall panels; steel-glass FRP composite connector; bending capacity; composite performance; theoretical calculation; FLEXURAL BEHAVIOR;
D O I
10.3390/buildings15010065
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
This paper aims to explore the impact of different arrangements of new steel-glass FRP composite connectors (SGCCs) on the bending and composite performance of sandwich wall panels. Through monotonic loading bending tests on six full-size specimens, aspects such as their failure modes, load-deflection curves, load-strain relationships, slip between the thermal insulation layer and concrete, and composite action were analyzed. The results show that all sandwich wall panels experienced bending and ductile failure, and exhibit partial composite performance, with P4 having the best composite performance and P1 the worst. The degree of composite action is positively correlated with the flexural bearing capacity. The bending capacity mainly depends on the layout rather than the total number of SGCCs. Arranging connectors along the short side of the panel has a more significant impact, and the number of connectors at the panel's ends has a greater influence on the composite performance. Except for P1, the theoretical value of the composite degree of the other sandwich wall panels exceeds 70%, and P4 reaches 85%. The theoretical calculations are in good agreement with the experimental results. This study provides theoretical and data support for the rational configuration of connectors in sandwich wall panels and is of great significance for building engineering applications. Meanwhile, suggestions for configuring connectors in actual engineering are also given.
引用
收藏
页数:20
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Flexural performance of composite sandwich wall panels with foamed concrete
    Li, Lei
    Huang, Wei
    Kong, Zhengyi
    Zhang, Li
    Wang, Youde
    Vu, Quang-Viet
    STEEL AND COMPOSITE STRUCTURES, 2024, 52 (04): : 391 - 403
  • [2] Thermal performance test of the new sandwich insulation composite wall panels
    Yang, JianGuo
    Wang, Gang
    Ding, KeWei
    ADVANCED RESEARCH ON MATERIAL ENGINEERING AND ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING, 2013, 676 : 22 - +
  • [3] Flexural Behavior of Composite Ultrahigh-Performance Concrete Sandwich Wall Panels
    Morcous, George
    Kodsy, Antony
    El-Khier, Mostafa Abo
    JOURNAL OF ARCHITECTURAL ENGINEERING, 2024, 30 (02)
  • [4] Axial Performance of Jointed Sandwich Wall Panels
    Abdolpour, Hassan
    Escusa, Goncalo
    Sena-Cruz, Jose M.
    Valente, Isabel B.
    Barros, Joaquim A. O.
    JOURNAL OF COMPOSITES FOR CONSTRUCTION, 2017, 21 (04)
  • [5] Partially Composite Concrete Sandwich Wall Panels What is percent composite?
    Maguire, Marc
    Pozo-Lora, Fray F.
    Concrete International, 2020, 42 (10): : 47 - 52
  • [6] Compressive performance of full-scale GFRP composite sandwich wall panels with wood core
    Yan, Zhihao
    Shen, Chunyan
    Fang, Hai
    Xie, Lei
    Bao, Xiangyu
    Wang, Hao
    JOURNAL OF BUILDING ENGINEERING, 2024, 86
  • [7] Iterative and Simplified Sandwich Beam Theory for Partially Composite Concrete Sandwich Wall Panels
    Al-Rubaye, Salam
    Sorensen, Taylor
    Maguire, Marc
    JOURNAL OF STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING, 2021, 147 (10)
  • [8] Comparative performance of composite sandwich panels and non-composite panels under blast loading
    Vasant A. Matsagar
    Materials and Structures, 2016, 49 : 611 - 629
  • [9] Comparative performance of composite sandwich panels and non-composite panels under blast loading
    Matsagar, Vasant A.
    MATERIALS AND STRUCTURES, 2016, 49 (1-2) : 611 - 629
  • [10] Experimental evaluation of the composite behavior of precast concrete sandwich wall panels
    Pessiki, S
    Mlynarczyk, A
    PCI JOURNAL, 2003, 48 (02): : 54 - +