Study on the prediction of the most adverse input direction of transmission tower-line system under far-field seismic ground motions

被引：0
|
作者：
Liu J.-C. [1 ]
Tian L. [1 ]
Zhang R. [1 ]
Yi S.-Y. [2 ]
机构：
[1] School of Civil Engineering, Shandong University, Jinan, 250061, Shandong
[2] Shanghai Electric Power Design Institute Co., Ltd., Shanghai
来源：
Gongcheng Lixue/Engineering Mechanics | 2020年 / 37卷
关键词：
Approximate method; Far-field seismic ground motion; Finite element model; Most adverse input direction; Response history analysis; Transmission tower-line system;
D O I：
10.6052/j.issn.1000-4750.2019.05.S014
中图分类号：
学科分类号：
摘要：
Based on the existing approximate method, the prediction of the most adverse input direction of a transmission tower-line system under far-field seismic excitations is carried out. Based on practical engineering, the finite element model of a transmission tower-line system is established in ABAQUS. In order to verify the applicability of the approximate method, seven typical far-field seismic ground motions are selected. The response history analysis of a transmission tower-line system under different input directions is carried out, and the results are compared with those obtained by the approximate method. The comparison shows that the approximate method has good accuracy and reduces the computational cost of response history analysis. The most adverse input direction of far-field seismic ground motion obtained by the approximate method can basically determine the most adverse response of the transmission tower-line system. At the same time, the most adverse input directions of different ground motions are different, and the vibration response of a transmission tower-line system varies with the input direction of ground motion. © 2020, Engineering Mechanics Press. All right reserved.
引用
收藏
页码：97 / 103
页数：6
相关论文
共 17 条
  • [1] Hall J F, Holmes W T, Somers P., Northridge earthquake, January 17, 1994, Preliminary reconnaissance report, (1994)
  • [2] Zhao Wenbo, Liu Mingyuan, Analysis on seismic disaster damage cases and their causes of electric power equipment in 5•12 Wenchuan earthquake, Journal of Nanjing University of Technology (Natural Science Edition), 31, 1, pp. 44-48, (2009)
  • [3] Shuai Xianghua, Jiang Lixin, Hou Jiansheng, Et al., Hazard analysis on the characteristics of the M6.5 Ludian earthquake, Technology for Earthquake Disaster Prevention, 9, 3, pp. 340-358, (2014)
  • [4] Xu Zhen, Wang Wenming, Lin Qinghai, Et al., Progressive collapse analysis of a simplified model for transmission tower-line coupled system under seismic action, China Earthquake Engineering Journal, 37, 2, pp. 304-309, (2015)
  • [5] Smeby W, Der K A., Modal combination rules for multicomponent earthquake excitation, Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 13, 1, pp. 1-12, (1985)
  • [6] Lopez O A, Torres R., The critical angle of seismic incidence and the maximum structural response, Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 26, 9, pp. 881-894, (1997)
  • [7] Menun C, Der K A., A replacement for the 30%, 40%, and SRSS rules for multicomponent seismic analysis, Earthquake Spectra, 14, 1, pp. 153-163, (1998)
  • [8] Quan Wei, Li Hongnan, Research on critical angle of curved bridge in multi-dimensional earthquake time history analysis, Journal of Vibration and Shock, 8, pp. 20-24, (2008)
  • [9] He Xiaoyu, Li Hongnan, Application of wavelet transform in multi-components seismic response of offshore platform-searching the critical angle of seismic wave, Journal of Vibration and Shock, 12, pp. 49-54, (2007)
  • [10] Zhang Yu, Li Quanwang, Fan Jiansheng, The maximum structural response of structures under bi-directional earthquake ground motions, Engineering Mechanics, 29, 11, pp. 129-136, (2012)
12