Is multi-source solid waste co-disposal practices in waste-to-energy plants sustainable???A comparative life cycle assessment

被引:0
|
作者
机构
[1] [1,Zhang, Jiayue
[2] Fei, Fan
[3] 1,Jiang, Zixuan
[4] Vorada, Kosajan
[5] 1,Leong, Zheng Hao
[6] 1,Wen, Zongguo
[7] Zhang, Hongbo
[8] Han, Shufei
关键词
Life cycle assessment;
D O I
10.1016/j.resconrec.2024.108069
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Multi-source solid waste co-incineration in waste-to-energy plants with excess capacity offers a promising symbiotic model, though its environmental impact and resource sustainability are uncertain, especially related to other disposal methods. This study evaluates for co-disposal scenarios of multi-source waste (food waste, municipal sludge, medical waste, and industrial waste) using life cycle analysis and comparing with ten traditional disposal methods. Results show co-disposal achieves over 95 % waste reduction, with energy recovery rates from 27.6 % to 63.3 %. Food waste co-disposal exhibits environmental benefits, while municipal sludge co-disposal shows impacts across all environmental indicators. Medical and industrial waste co-disposal produces significant fossil CO2 emissions but mitigates other environmental impacts. From an economic perspective, co-disposal shows IRRs from 16.8 % to over 2000 %, reducing waste disposal fees by 23.7 % to 90.5 %. This study recommends co-disposal as a supplementary approach, advocating for clearer industry standards, aligned regional planning, and refined operational practices to enhance sustainability. © 2024 Elsevier B.V.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Comparative life cycle assessment of organic industrial solid waste co-disposal in a MSW incineration plant
    Liu, Yuhao
    Li, Aijun
    Guo, Guangzhao
    Zhang, Junwei
    Ren, Yang
    Dong, Lu
    Gong, Lifang
    Hu, Hongyun
    Yao, Hong
    Naruse, Ichiro
    [J]. ENERGY, 2024, 305
  • [2] Life cycle assessment of hydrothermal carbonization of municipal solid waste for waste-to-energy generation
    Rahman, Kaniz Fatema
    Abrar, Md Farhatul
    Tithi, Sanjida Safa
    Kabir, Kazi Bayzid
    Kirtania, Kawnish
    [J]. Journal of Environmental Management, 2024, 370
  • [3] A comparative life cycle assessment on four waste-to-energy scenarios for food waste generated in eateries
    Tong, Huanhuan
    Shen, Ye
    Zhang, Jingxin
    Wang, Chi-Hwa
    Ge, Tian Shu
    Tong, Yen Wah
    [J]. APPLIED ENERGY, 2018, 225 : 1143 - 1157
  • [4] Comparative analysis of existing waste-to-energy reference plants for municipal solid waste
    Satiada, Marco Angelo
    Calderon, Aldrin
    [J]. CLEANER ENVIRONMENTAL SYSTEMS, 2021, 3
  • [5] Decarbonising waste-to-energy: A life cycle assessment study
    Paulillo, Andrea
    Sebastiani, Alex
    Lettieri, Paola
    Materazzi, Massimiliano
    [J]. RESOURCES CONSERVATION AND RECYCLING, 2024, 209
  • [6] Exergy Life Cycle Assessment of a Waste-to-Energy plant
    Rocco, Matteo V.
    Colombo, Emanuela
    [J]. CLEAN ENERGY FOR CLEAN CITY: CUE 2016 - APPLIED ENERGY SYMPOSIUM AND FORUM: LOW-CARBON CITIES AND URBAN ENERGY SYSTEMS, 2016, 104 : 562 - 567
  • [7] Life Cycle Assessment of Waste-to-Energy: Energy Recovery from Wood Waste in Malaysia
    Choong, Joo Ee
    Onn, Chiu Chuen
    Yusoff, Sumiani
    Mohd, Nuruol Syuhadaa
    [J]. POLISH JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES, 2019, 28 (04): : 2593 - 2602
  • [8] Sustainable Environmental Assessment of Waste-to-Energy Practices: Co-Pyrolysis of Food Waste and Discarded Meal Boxes
    Li, Gang
    Yang, Tenglun
    Xiao, Wenbo
    Wu, Jiahui
    Xu, Fuzhuo
    Li, Lianliang
    Gao, Fei
    Huang, Zhigang
    [J]. FOODS, 2022, 11 (23)
  • [9] Life cycle assessment of waste-to-energy (WtE) technologies for electricity generation using municipal solid waste in Nigeria
    Ayodele, T. R.
    Ogunjuyigbe, A. S. O.
    Alao, M. A.
    [J]. APPLIED ENERGY, 2017, 201 : 200 - 218
  • [10] Life Cycle Assessment for Solid Waste Disposal Options in Malaysia
    Saheri, Sanaz
    Mir, Masoud Aghajani
    Basri, Noor Ezlin Ahmad
    Mahmood, Noor Zalina Binti
    Begum, Rawshan Ara
    [J]. POLISH JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES, 2012, 21 (05): : 1377 - 1382