Field Performance Monitoring of Repair Treatments on Joint Concrete Pavements

被引:1
|
作者
School of Highway Engineering, Changsha University of Science and Technology, Chiling Road 45#, Hunan, Changsha [1 ]
410076, China
不详 [2 ]
TX
78731, United States
不详 [3 ]
机构
来源
J Test Eval | 2008年 / 2卷 / 119-127期
关键词
Dowel bar retrofit - Dowel bars - Field performance - Full depth repair - Joint concrete pavement - Load transfer - Polyurethane Foam - Polyurethane foam injection - Reflective crack - Target levels;
D O I
10.1520/JTE101362
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
This paper presents the performance of three rehabilitation methods on six highways to restore the condition of concrete pavement: (1) polyurethane foam injection (PFI), (2) dowel bar retrofit (DBR), and (3) full depth repair (FDR). PFI was able to raise the slabs to the target levels; however, it was not able to maintain the slabs at the target levels and thus prevent slabs from further settlement. In addition, new cracks have been observed in some slabs and it was believed that PFI might have created uneven supports that allowed the truck traffic to shatter the slabs. Long-term benefits of DBR were demonstrated on a project with 10 years of traffic, where asphalt overlay was placed. Only minimum reflective cracks were observed on the DBR sections as compared to severe reflective cracks on sections without DBR. In another project, DBR effectively restored the ride quality that reduced the International Roughness Index (IRI) from 2.83 m/km to 1.26 m/km. The poor ride of this pavement section before DBR was due mainly to severe faulting. This illustrates that dowel bars provided excellent load transfer at transverse contraction joints, which minimized the potential for faulting. FDR has been used to repair localized pavement distresses. However, subsidence of slabs and cracks reappeared on the slabs that received FDR, due partly to the inadequate base support. Currently, there are no objective test methods and criteria for base preparation in the FDR specifications. To improve the effectiveness of FDR, current FDR specifications need to be revised. © 2008 by ASTM International.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Field performance monitoring of repair treatments on joint concrete pavements
    Chen, Dar Hao
    Won, Moon
    JOURNAL OF TESTING AND EVALUATION, 2008, 36 (02) : 119 - 127
  • [2] Field performance monitoring of pervious concrete pavements
    Singh, Avishreshth
    Sampath, Prasanna Venkatesh
    Biligiri, Krishna Prapoorna
    ROAD MATERIALS AND PAVEMENT DESIGN, 2023, 24 (12) : 3013 - 3028
  • [3] FIELD INSTRUMENTATION AND PERFORMANCE MONITORING OF RIGID PAVEMENTS
    ROLLINGS, RS
    PITTMAN, DW
    JOURNAL OF TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING-ASCE, 1992, 118 (03): : 361 - 370
  • [4] Small-Scale Joint Performance Test for Concrete Pavements
    Barman, Manik
    Vandenbossche, Julie M.
    Janssen, Donald
    ACI STRUCTURAL JOURNAL, 2019, 116 (06) : 109 - 119
  • [5] Overview of joint sealants for concrete pavements
    Voigt, Jerry
    Public Works, 1998, 129 (04): : 64 - 66
  • [6] PERFORMANCE OF ASPHALT CONCRETE PAVEMENTS
    BARKSDALE, RD
    TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING JOURNAL OF ASCE, 1977, 103 (01): : 55 - 73
  • [7] High performance concrete for pavements
    Kim, Haejin
    Goulias, Dimitrios G.
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE FIRST INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON RECENT ADVANCES IN CONCRETE TECHNOLOGY, 2007, : 201 - 210
  • [8] Field focused long term performance evaluation of asphalt concrete pavements
    Solaimanian, M.
    EFFICIENT TRANSPORTATION AND PAVEMENT SYSTEMS: CHARACTERIZATION, MECHANISMS, SIMULATION, AND MODELING, 2009, : 683 - +
  • [9] The Selection of PCC Joint Repair Trigger Values and Void Detection for Concrete Pavements Overlaid with Asphalt
    Al-Abbasi, A.
    Shalaby, A.
    AIRFIELD AND HIGHWAY PAVEMENTS 2019: TESTING AND CHARACTERIZATION OF PAVEMENT MATERIALS, 2019, : 332 - 342
  • [10] Experimental study and field application of calcium sulfoaluminate cement for rapid repair of concrete pavements
    Yanhua Guan
    Ying Gao
    Renjuan Sun
    Moon C. Won
    Zhi Ge
    Frontiers of Structural and Civil Engineering, 2017, 11 : 338 - 345