Quantum optimization with linear Ising penalty functions for customer data science

被引:0
|
作者
Mirkarimi, Puya [1 ]
Shukla, Ishaan [1 ]
Hoyle, David C. [2 ]
Williams, Ross [2 ]
Chancellor, Nicholas [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Durham, Dept Phys, Durham DH1 3LE, England
[2] Dunnhumby, 184 Shepherds Bush Rd, London W6 7NL, England
[3] Newcastle Univ, Sch Comp, 1 Sci Sq, Newcastle Upon Tyne NE4 5TG, England
来源
PHYSICAL REVIEW RESEARCH | 2024年 / 6卷 / 04期
基金
英国工程与自然科学研究理事会;
关键词
CANNIBALIZATION;
D O I
10.1103/PhysRevResearch.6.043241
中图分类号
O4 [物理学];
学科分类号
0702 ;
摘要
Constrained combinatorial optimization problems, which are ubiquitous in industry, can be solved by quantum algorithms such as quantum annealing (QA) and the quantum approximate optimization algorithm (QAOA). In these quantum algorithms, constraints are typically implemented with quadratic penalty functions. This penalty method can introduce large energy scales and make interaction graphs much more dense. These effects can result in worse performance of quantum optimization, particularly on near-term devices that have sparse hardware graphs and other physical limitations. In this work, we consider linear Ising penalty functions, which are applied with local fields in the Ising model, as an alternative method for implementing constraints that makes more efficient use of physical resources. We study the behavior of the penalty method in the context of quantum optimization for customer data science problems. Our theoretical analysis and numerical simulations of QA and the QAOA indicate that this penalty method can lead to better performance in quantum optimization than the quadratic method. However, the linear Ising penalty method is not suitable for all problems as it cannot always exactly implement the desired constraint. In cases where the linear method is not successful in implementing all constraints, we propose that schemes involving both quadratic and linear Ising penalties can be effective.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Experimental demonstration of improved quantum optimization with linear Ising penalties
    Mirkarimi, Puya
    Hoyle, David C.
    Williams, Ross
    Chancellor, Nicholas
    NEW JOURNAL OF PHYSICS, 2024, 26 (10):
  • [2] A unifying theory of exactness of linear penalty functions II: parametric penalty functions
    Dolgopolik, M. V.
    OPTIMIZATION, 2017, 66 (10) : 1577 - 1622
  • [3] PENALTY FUNCTIONS IN LINEAR INTEGER PROGRAMMING
    SHMELEV, VV
    AUTOMATION AND REMOTE CONTROL, 1975, 36 (09) : 1566 - 1570
  • [4] Improving Penalty Functions for Structural Optimization
    Joghataie, A.
    Takalloozadeh, M.
    SCIENTIA IRANICA TRANSACTION A-CIVIL ENGINEERING, 2009, 16 (04): : 308 - 320
  • [5] Improving penalty functions for structural optimization
    Joghataie, A.
    Takalloozadeh, M.
    Scientia Iranica, 2009, 16 (4 A) : 308 - 320
  • [6] Extended Lagrange and Penalty Functions in Optimization
    A. M. Rubinov
    X. Q. Yang
    B. M. Glover
    Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, 2001, 111 : 381 - 405
  • [7] CONSTRAINED OPTIMIZATION VIA PENALTY FUNCTIONS
    LOOTSMA, FA
    PHILIPS RESEARCH REPORTS, 1968, 23 (05): : 408 - &
  • [8] Extended Lagrange and penalty functions in optimization
    Rubinov, AM
    Yang, XQ
    Glover, BM
    JOURNAL OF OPTIMIZATION THEORY AND APPLICATIONS, 2001, 111 (02) : 381 - 405
  • [9] On the Merit and Penalty Functions for the DC Optimization
    Strekalovsky, Alexander S.
    DISCRETE OPTIMIZATION AND OPERATIONS RESEARCH, DOOR 2016, 2016, 9869 : 452 - 466
  • [10] A unifying theory of exactness of linear penalty functions
    Dolgopolik, M. V.
    OPTIMIZATION, 2016, 65 (06) : 1167 - 1202