Empowering informed choices: How computer vision can assists consumers in making decisions about meat quality

被引:0
|
作者
Menezes, Guilherme L. [1 ]
Valente Junior, Dante T. [2 ]
Ferreira, Rafael E. P. [1 ]
Oliveira, Dario A. B. [1 ]
Araujo, Julcimara A. [3 ]
Duarte, Marcio [2 ]
Dorea, Joao R. R. [1 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Wisconsin, Dept Anim & Dairy Sci, Madison, WI 53703 USA
[2] Univ Guelph, Dept Anim Biosci, Guelph, ON N1L0N6, Canada
[3] Univ Fed Vicosa, Dept Anim Sci, BR-36570900 Vicosa, MG, Brazil
[4] Univ Wisconsin, Dept Biol Syst Engn, Madison, WI 53703 USA
基金
加拿大自然科学与工程研究理事会;
关键词
Artificial intelligence; Image analysis; Shear force; Intramuscular fat; Deep learning; SHEAR FORCE; BEEF MUSCLES; TENDERNESS; PORK; CLASSIFICATION; SYSTEM; COLOR; ACCEPTABILITY; PREDICTION; STEAKS;
D O I
10.1016/j.meatsci.2024.109675
中图分类号
TS2 [食品工业];
学科分类号
0832 ;
摘要
Consumers often find it challenging to assess meat sensory quality, influenced by tenderness and intramuscular fat (IMF). This study aims to develop a computer vision system (CVS) using smartphone images to classify beef and pork steak tenderness (1), predicting shear force (SF) and IMF content (2), and performing a comparative evaluation between consumer assessments and the method's output (3). The dataset consisted of 924 beef and 514 pork steaks (one image per steak). We trained a deep neural network for image classification and regression. The model achieved an F1-score of 68.1 % in classifying beef as tender. After re-categorizing the dataset into 'tender' and 'tough', the F1-score for identifying tender increased to 76.6 %. For pork loin tenderness, the model achieved an F1-score of 81.4 %. This score slightly improved to 81.5 % after re-categorization into two classes. The regression models for predicting SF and IMF in beef steak achieved an R2 value of 0.64 and 0.62, respectively, with a root mean squared prediction error (RMSEP) of 16.9 N and 2.6 %. For pork loin, the neural network predicted SF with an R2 value of 0.76 and an RMSEP of 9.15 N, and IMF with an R2 value of 0.54 and an RMSEP of 1.22 %. In 1000 paired comparisons, the neural network correctly identified the more tender beef steak in 76.5 % of cases, compared to a 46.7 % accuracy rate for human assessments. These findings suggest that CVS can provide a more objective method for evaluating meat tenderness and IMF before purchase, potentially enhancing consumer satisfaction.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 10 条
  • [1] Empowering informed choices: How computer vision can assist consumers in making decisions about meat quality
    Menezes, Guilherme
    Junior, Dante
    Ferreira, Rafael
    Oliveira, Dario
    Araujo, Julcimara
    Duarte, Marcio S.
    Dorea, Joao R. R.
    JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2024, 102 : 227 - 227
  • [2] Curriculum: Big Decisions: Making Healthy, Informed Choices about Sex
    Davis, Melanie
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SEXUALITY EDUCATION, 2009, 4 (3-4) : 248 - 251
  • [3] Empowering Consumers to Engage with Health Decisions: Making Medical Choices Feel Easy Increases Patient Participation
    Steffel, Mary
    Williams, Elanor F.
    Carney, Stephan
    JOURNAL OF THE ASSOCIATION FOR CONSUMER RESEARCH, 2022, 7 (02) : 154 - 163
  • [4] Assessing the quality of digital health services: How can informed decisions be promoted?
    Rebitschek, Felix G.
    Gigerenzer, Gerd
    BUNDESGESUNDHEITSBLATT-GESUNDHEITSFORSCHUNG-GESUNDHEITSSCHUTZ, 2020, 63 (06) : 665 - 673
  • [5] Making rational choices about how best to support consumers' use of medicines: a perspective review
    Ryan, Rebecca
    Hill, Sophie
    THERAPEUTIC ADVANCES IN DRUG SAFETY, 2016, 7 (04) : 159 - 164
  • [6] HOW INFORMED CAN CONSENT BE - NEW LIGHT ON COMPREHENSION AMONG ELDERLY PEOPLE MAKING DECISIONS ABOUT ENTERAL TUBE-FEEDING
    KRYNSKI, MD
    TYMCHUK, AJ
    OUSLANDER, JG
    GERONTOLOGIST, 1994, 34 (01): : 36 - 43
  • [7] How clinicians can support women in making decisions about psychopharmacological treatments in pregnancy
    Galbally, Megan
    Woods, Nicole
    Snellen, Martien
    WORLD PSYCHIATRY, 2022, 21 (01) : 149 - 151
  • [8] How informed is declared altruism in clinical trials? A qualitative interview study of patient decision-making about the QUEST trials (Quality of Life after Mastectomy and Breast Reconstruction)
    Bidad, Natalie
    MacDonald, Lindsay
    Winters, Zoe E.
    Edwards, Sarah J. L.
    Emson, Marie
    Griffin, Clare L.
    Bliss, Judith
    Horne, Rob
    TRIALS, 2016, 17
  • [9] How informed is declared altruism in clinical trials? A qualitative interview study of patient decision-making about the QUEST trials (Quality of Life after Mastectomy and Breast Reconstruction)
    Natalie Bidad
    Lindsay MacDonald
    Zoë E. Winters
    Sarah J. L. Edwards
    Marie Emson
    Clare L. Griffin
    Judith Bliss
    Rob Horne
    Trials, 17
  • [10] Einschätzung der Qualität digitaler Gesundheitsangebote: Wie können informierte Entscheidungen gefördert werden?Assessing the quality of digital health services: How can informed decisions be promoted?
    Felix G. Rebitschek
    Gerd Gigerenzer
    Bundesgesundheitsblatt - Gesundheitsforschung - Gesundheitsschutz, 2020, 63 (6) : 665 - 673