Dynamic and static multi-objective optimization of a vertical machining center based on response surface method

被引:13
|
作者
Jiang H. [1 ]
Guan Y. [1 ]
Qiu Z. [1 ]
Zhang X. [1 ]
Chen Z. [1 ]
Xu G. [2 ]
机构
[1] School of Mechanical and Automotive Engineering, South China University of Technology
[2] Foshan Nanhai Zhongnan Machinery Co. Ltd.
关键词
Finite element method; Multi-Objective optimization; Optimization design; Response surface methodology;
D O I
10.3901/JME.2011.11.125
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
In order to satisfy the performance requirement of the dynamic and static stiffness and light weight of a machining centre, a method of multi-objective optimization driven by the first natural frequency and mass is proposed. Modal parameters are identified by using a comprehensive approach based on modal test and finite element analysis. The appropriate structural finite element analysis samples in design space are selected by using the central composite design (CCD) experiment method. Quadratic polynomials are employed to construct response surface (RS) model, which reflects the relationship between design inputs and structural response outputs, according to the response outputs of these samples obtained by analyzing the dynamic and static characteristics of the machining centre at these samples with the software ANSYS. Well-distributed samples are generated in the design space by shifted Hammersley sampling method. The prominent points are selected as initial samples. The goal of getting higher first natural frequency and lighter weight is reached and the Pareto optimal solution set is obtained by the multi-objective genetic algorithm in the optimization. Through the optimization, the mass of the machining center is decreased by 6.58% under the condition of ensuring the dynamic and static performance. The results show the high precision and strong engineering practicability of the proposed optimization method. © 2011 Journal of Mechanical Engineering.
引用
收藏
页码:125 / 133
页数:8
相关论文
共 18 条
  • [1] Zhang J., Lu X., Sun Q., Et al., Dynamic optimization design of 5 axis numerical control gantry machining cente, China Mechanical Engineerin, 16, 21, pp. 1949-1953, (2005)
  • [2] Kang Y., Chang Y.P., Tsai J.W., Et al., Integrated "CAE" strategies for the design of machine tool spindle-bearing systems, Finite Elements in Analysis and Design, 37, pp. 485-511, (2001)
  • [3] Huo D., Cheng K., Wardle F., A holistic integrated dynamic design and modeling approach applied to the development of ultra-precision micro-milling machines, Int. Journal of Machine Tools & Manufacture, 50, pp. 335-343, (2010)
  • [4] Altintas Y., Brecher C., Weck C., Et al., Virtual machine tool, Annals-Manufacturing Technology, 54, 2, pp. 115-138, (2005)
  • [5] Sun G., Li G., Zhong Z., Et al., Optimization design of multi-objective particle swarm in crashworthiness based on sequential response surface method, Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 45, 2, pp. 224-230, (2009)
  • [6] Xiong J., Qiao Z., Han Z., Optimum aerodynamic design of transonic wing based on response surface methodology, Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 27, 3, pp. 399-402, (2006)
  • [7] Li Y., Zhang L., Liu Z., Et al., Multi-objective optimization design of heavy forge framed hydraulic press driven by stiffness and mass, Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 46, 1, pp. 140-146, (2010)
  • [8] Huang H., Zhao X., Mi H., Et al., The whole machine modeling and mode analysis of super-high speed surface grinder based on FEM, Journal of Hunan University, 32, 4, pp. 39-42, (2005)
  • [9] Li H., Journal of Machine Tool Design Handbook, (1999)
  • [10] Box G.E.P., Draper N.R., Experimental Model Building and Response Surfaces, (1987)