Comparison analysis of premium connection's seal structure

被引:0
|
作者
Wang J.-D. [1 ,2 ]
Feng Y.-R. [1 ,2 ]
Lin K. [1 ,2 ]
Qin C.-Y. [1 ,2 ]
Song Y.-P. [3 ]
机构
[1] Tubler Goods Research of Center, CNOP
[2] Key Laboratory of Environment and Mechanical Behavior of OCTG
[3] Bao Steel
关键词
Contact length; Contact pressure; Finite element method; Physical test; Seal structure;
D O I
10.3969/j.issn.1673-5005.2010.05.023
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The premium connection's seal structure of the casing is the key factor affecting the performance of sealing. The changes of contact length, contact pressure and penetration length along the primary sealing surface of two different main seal structure forms (the cone/cone and arc/cone) were analyzed by finite element method at make-up, tension, bending, internal pressure and tensile loading. The changing laws of different types of sealing surface with load capacity were given. The new seal principles were put forward. When the effective contact length of sealing contact surface exceeded 0.5 mm, the value of contact pressure minimum subtracted from maximum was 5.8 times internal pressure, and in range of effective contact pressure and length, contact surface plastic strain was controlled in the yield point's scope of strain, anti-galling and eliminating seal clearance were made. The test results agree well with the numerical simulation. The results show that the established model was proper and the used method was reasonable. The influence of the tensile load on the seal was significantly higher than bending load.
引用
收藏
页码:126 / 130
页数:4
相关论文
共 12 条
  • [1] Kirk H., Wagg B., Roth T., Using ultrasonic techniques to accurately examine seal surface contact stress in premium connections, (2007)
  • [2] Gam M., Assessing tubular connection leakage integrity, World Oil, 223, 2, pp. 82-84, (2002)
  • [3] Sathuvalli U.B., Suryanarayana P.V., Best Practices For Prevention and Management of Sustained Casing Pressure Joint Industry Project Report-Section I, (2001)
  • [4] Petroleum and natural gas industries-procedures for testing casing and tubing connections, pp. 81-82, (2002)
  • [5] Bradley A.B., Nagasaku S., Verger E., Premium connection design, testing, and installation for HPHT sour wells, (2005)
  • [6] Michael J., Manuel A.D., How to evaluate and select premium casing connections, (1996)
  • [7] Petroleum and natural gas industries-equations and calculations for the properties of casing, tubing, drill pipe and line pipe used as casing or tubing, pp. 22-23, (2007)
  • [8] Hu D.-M., Hao M.-M., Wu D.-L., Numerical computation of mechanical seals of spriral groove in upstream pumping with finite element method, Journal of the University of Petroleum, China(Edition of Natural Science), 26, 6, pp. 74-76, (2002)
  • [9] Feng X.-Z., Peng X.-D., Study of stiffness and leakage rate of spiral groove dry gas face seals, Journal of the University of Petroleum, China(Edition of Natural Science), 29, 2, pp. 84-85, (2005)
  • [10] Masao O., Development of nippon steel premium connections, Oil Country Tube Goods, 3, pp. 1-15, (1991)