Urease Inhibitors Weaken the Efficiency of Nitrification Inhibitors in Mitigating N2O Emissions from Soils Irrigated with Alternative Water Resources

被引:0
|
作者
Tao, Zhen [1 ]
Li, Zhongyang [1 ,2 ]
Li, Siyi [1 ]
Zhao, Lijuan [1 ]
Gregory, Andrew S. [3 ]
Fan, Xiangyang [1 ]
Liu, Chuncheng [1 ]
Hu, Chao [1 ]
Liu, Yuan [1 ]
机构
[1] Agricultural Water and Soil Environmental Field Science Observation Research Station, Institute of Farmland Irrigation of CAAS, Xinxiang,453002, China
[2] National Research and Observation Station of Shangqiu Agro-Ecology System, Shangqiu,476000, China
[3] Protecting Crops and the Environment, Rothamsted Research, Harpenden,AL5 2JQ, United Kingdom
来源
Water, Air, and Soil Pollution | 2025年 / 236卷 / 01期
关键词
Denitrification;
D O I
10.1007/s11270-024-07670-9
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
It is generally accepted that inhibitors are effective in reducing agricultural nitrous oxide (N2O) emissions from soils irrigated by groundwater. However, it was unclear whether these inhibitors effectively regulate N2O emissions from soils irrigated with alternative waters, like reclaimed water and livestock wastewater. To clarify this, nitrapyrin, a nitrification inhibitor, and N-(N-butyl) thiophosphoric triamide, a urease inhibitor, were added separately or jointly to the soils irrigated by groundwater, reclaimed water and livestock wastewater through two consecutive cycles of pot experiment. Both the single and combined addition of inhibitors lowered N2O emissions from soils irrigated with alternative water, while the reduction effect of the combined application decreased relative to that of the single application. The using of combined inhibitors did reduce the enrichment level of nitrification genes and slow down the nitrification process, but the associated relatively high nirS/nosZ ratio potentially discounted its ability to prevent N2O emissions. Whereas under groundwater irrigation, treatment with combined inhibitors only decreased N2O emissions in the first cycle but not in the second cycle. Inhibitor application affected the composition of soil bacterial communities, and in particular, urease inhibitor application increased community differences across the two cycles. Moreover, using inhibitors led to a general reduction in the enrichment level of the denitrification genes narG and nosZ, and we speculate that inhibitors could also indirectly manipulate N2O release by involving the denitrification process. Structural equation model results further displayed that the relative abundance of the nxrA and narG genes and NH4+-N concentration played a vital role in the regulation of N2O release from the alternative water-irrigated soils applied with inhibitors. Graphical Abstract: (Figure presented.) © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2024.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Biochar Weakens the Efficiency of Nitrification Inhibitors and Urease Inhibitors in Mitigating Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Soil Irrigated with Alternative Water Resources
    Tao, Zhen
    Liu, Yuan
    Li, Siyi
    Li, Baogui
    Fan, Xiangyang
    Liu, Chuncheng
    Hu, Chao
    Zhang, Shuiqing
    Li, Zhongyang
    [J]. WATER, 2024, 16 (18)
  • [2] Nitrification inhibitor's effect on mitigating N2O emissions was weakened by urease inhibitor in calcareous soils
    Zhao, Zichao
    Wu, Di
    Bol, Roland
    Shi, Yuefeng
    Guo, Yanbin
    Meng, Fanqiao
    Wu, Wenliang
    [J]. ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT, 2017, 166 : 142 - 150
  • [3] Urease and nitrification inhibitors to reduce emissions of CH4 and N2O in rice production
    Xu, XK
    Boeckx, P
    Van Cleemput, O
    Zhou, LK
    [J]. NUTRIENT CYCLING IN AGROECOSYSTEMS, 2002, 64 (1-2) : 203 - 211
  • [4] Urease and nitrification inhibitors to reduce emissions of CH4 and N2O in rice production
    Xingkai Xu
    Pascal Boeckx
    Oswald Van Cleemput
    Likai Zhou
    [J]. Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems, 2002, 64 : 203 - 211
  • [5] Climate mitigation efficiency of nitrification and urease inhibitors: impact on N2O emission-A review
    Adu-Poku, David
    Ackerson, Nana Osei Bonsu
    Devine, Robert Nii Oti Abam
    Addo, Austine Gamey
    [J]. SCIENTIFIC AFRICAN, 2022, 16
  • [6] N2O emissions from a field trial as influenced by N fertilisation and nitrification inhibitors
    Báez, D
    Coutinho, J
    Moreira, N
    Trindade, H
    [J]. CONTROLLING NITROGEN FLOWS AND LOSSES, 2004, : 285 - 287
  • [7] Comparative Effectiveness of Biogas Residue Acidification and Nitrification Inhibitors in Mitigating CO2 and N2O Emissions from Biogas Residue-Amended Soils
    Guo, Yafei
    Anjum, Anjum
    Khan, Ahmad
    Naeem, Asif
    Muehling, Karl H.
    [J]. WATER AIR AND SOIL POLLUTION, 2021, 232 (09):
  • [8] Comparative Effectiveness of Biogas Residue Acidification and Nitrification Inhibitors in Mitigating CO2 and N2O Emissions from Biogas Residue-Amended Soils
    Yafei Guo
    Anjum Anjum
    Ahmad Khan
    Asif Naeem
    Karl H. Mühling
    [J]. Water, Air, & Soil Pollution, 2021, 232
  • [9] Effect of nitrification inhibitors on mitigating N2O and NO emissions from an agricultural field under drip fertigation in the North China Plain
    Tian, Di
    Zhang, Yuanyuan
    Zhou, Yizhen
    Mu, Yujing
    Liu, Junfeng
    Zhang, Chenglong
    Liu, Pengfei
    [J]. SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2017, 598 : 87 - 96
  • [10] Assessing and mitigating N2O emissions from agricultural soils
    Mosier, AR
    Duxbury, JM
    Freney, JR
    Heinemeyer, O
    Minami, K
    [J]. CLIMATIC CHANGE, 1998, 40 (01) : 7 - 38