Servitization as a strategy for diffusing radical technologies: An analysis of U.S. top corporate R&D investors

被引:0
|
作者
Nasirov, Shukhrat [1 ]
Castaldi, Carolina [2 ]
机构
[1] Alliance Manchester Business School, University of Manchester, United Kingdom
[2] Department of Human Geography and Spatial Planning, Utrecht University, Netherlands
关键词
Investments - Resource valuation;
D O I
10.1016/j.respol.2024.105123
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The diffusion of radical technologies poses a significant challenge for firms. While existing studies have mainly concentrated on organizing for radical innovation, less attention has been given to strategies that enable firms to bring these technologies to the product market. In this paper, we argue that servitization – the addition of product-related services to tangible product offerings – can serve as a potential solution, largely due to its ability to reduce customer uncertainty about the nature and utilization of radical technologies and offset adoption costs. However, there are limits to deploying this strategy: developing and implementing service-generating capabilities, together with maintaining and advancing the capability to generate radical technologies, can be costly and risky. Our analysis of 505 top corporate R&D investors from the U.S. manufacturing industry confirms a significant relationship between technological radicalness and servitization, but it is nuanced and depends on the level of financial resources available to firms, known as financial resource slack. More specifically, firms with higher slack have a greater extent of servitization activities when their technologies are more radical. In turn, firms with lower slack have a greater extent of servitization activities when their technologies fall within the middle range of the radicalness spectrum. We use these findings to draw implications for practice and policy. © 2024 The Author(s)
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Corporate R&D and firm efficiency: evidence from Europe’s top R&D investors
    Subal C. Kumbhakar
    Raquel Ortega-Argilés
    Lesley Potters
    Marco Vivarelli
    Peter Voigt
    [J]. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 2012, 37 : 125 - 140
  • [2] Corporate R&D and firm efficiency: evidence from Europe's top R&D investors
    Kumbhakar, Subal C.
    Ortega-Argiles, Raquel
    Potters, Lesley
    Vivarelli, Marco
    Voigt, Peter
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PRODUCTIVITY ANALYSIS, 2012, 37 (02) : 125 - 140
  • [3] U.S. to increase spending on R&D
    [J]. 1997, (104):
  • [4] U.S. productivity in agriculture and R&D
    R. Färe
    S. Grosskopf
    D. Margaritis
    [J]. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 2008, 30 : 7 - 12
  • [5] Realistic scenario for U.S. R&D
    [J]. Bull Sci Technol Soc, 1 (14):
  • [6] Reflections on Mansfield, technological complexity, and the "golden age" of U.S. corporate R&D
    Auerswald P.E.
    Branscomb L.M.E.
    [J]. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 2004, 30 (1-2) : 139 - 157
  • [7] U.S. and Europe emphasize need for R&D
    [J]. Opt Photonics News, 2006, 2 (36):
  • [8] Firm growth and R&D investment: SVAR evidence from the world's top R&D investors
    Coad, Alex
    Grassano, Nicola
    [J]. INDUSTRY AND INNOVATION, 2019, 26 (05) : 508 - 533
  • [9] NTT's R&D strategy for IC card technologies
    Hotta, Hirofumi
    Ono, Ryoji
    [J]. NTT R and D, 2000, 49 (12): : 728 - 732
  • [10] AI patenting and employment: evidence from the world's top R&D investors
    Sterlacchini, Alessandro
    [J]. INNOVATION-THE EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SOCIAL SCIENCE RESEARCH, 2024,