In Reply to McClelland and Watson

被引：0
|
作者：
Lee, Grace [1 ]
Lamba, Nayan [1 ]
Shih, Helen A. [1 ]
机构：
[1] Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston,MA, United States
来源：
International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics | 2021年 / 110卷 / 02期
关键词：
D O I：
10.1016/j.ijrobp.2020.12.060
中图分类号：
学科分类号：
摘要：
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] In Reply to McClelland et al
    2018, Elsevier Inc. (100):
  • [2] CASE FOR IQ TESTS - REPLY TO MCCLELLAND
    JENSEN, AR
    HUMANIST, 1972, 32 (01) : 14 - 14
  • [3] WATSON CONTRADICTION - REPLY
    WATSON, G
    ENCOUNTER, 1988, 70 (04): : 79 - 80
  • [4] Scanlon and Watson reply
    Scanlon, David O.
    Watson, Graeme W.
    Physical Review Letters, 2012, 108 (21)
  • [5] Reply to Stokes and Watson
    Govande, V. P.
    Lagatta, J.
    Basir, M. A.
    JOURNAL OF PERINATOLOGY, 2013, 33 (10) : 823 - 824
  • [6] Reply to Stokes and Watson
    V P Govande
    J Lagatta
    M A Basir
    Journal of Perinatology, 2013, 33 : 823 - 824
  • [7] Combination and structure, not gradedness, is the issue - Reply to McClelland and Patterson
    Pinker, S
    Ullman, M
    TRENDS IN COGNITIVE SCIENCES, 2002, 6 (11) : 472 - 474
  • [8] Reply to correspondence by Smart and Watson
    C. Ratto
    Techniques in Coloproctology, 2018, 22 (3) : 249 - 250
  • [9] Reply to Korsgaard, Wallace, and Watson
    Darwall, Stephen
    ETHICS, 2007, 118 (01) : 52 - 69
  • [10] Reply to McClelland et al.: EMG rectification and coherence analysis
    Farmer, Simon F.
    Halliday, David M.
    JOURNAL OF NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 2014, 111 (05) : 1151 - 1152
12345