Experimental study on influencing factors of microbial gas production performance

被引:0
|
作者
Deng W. [1 ]
Wu Z. [1 ]
机构
[1] School of Civil Engineering, Southeast University, Nanjing
关键词
desaturation; gas production performance; microbial bubbles; Pseudomonas stutzen; surfactant;
D O I
10.3969/j.issn.1001-0505.2022.04.023
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
To study the influences of multiple factors on the gas production performance of microorganisms, surfactants were selected to improve the stability of bubbles, and a control method for desaturation was obtained. The effects of temperature, pH value, microbial concentration, nitrogen source mass concentration, surfactant type, and dosage on the gas production performance of Pseudomonas stutzen were analyzed by a six-factor five-level orthogonal experiment. Experimental results show that when the temperature is between 4 °C and 30 °C, the gas production performance increases with the increase of temperatures, and the gas production rate at 30 °C is 5 times that at 4 °C. The pH value has a greater effect on the stagnation time, and the stagnation time in the alkaline environment is obvious lower than that in the acidic environment, the stagnation time at pH = 9 is 53 h less than that at pH = 5. The gas production performance first increases and then weakens with the increase of the microbial concentration, the optimal microbial concentration is optical density OD600=0.10. The gas production at the nitrogen source mass concentration of 3. 0 g/L is 5. 3 times that of 1.0 g/L, and the gas production has a linear relationship with the carbon-nitrogen mass ratio. The stagnation time, the gas production time and the gas production rate are mostly affected by temperature; the gas production is determined by the mass concentration of the nitrogen source. © 2022 Southeast University. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:806 / 815
页数:9
相关论文
共 25 条
  • [1] Lo I T, Lin C Y, Yang C T, Et al., Assessing the blockage risk of disaster-relief road for a large-scale earthquake [J], KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering, 24, 12, pp. 3820-3834, (2020)
  • [2] Chen G X, Gu X F, Chang X D, Et al., Review and implication of successful ground improvement cases about mitigating soil liquefaction induced by 8 strong earthquakes from 1989 to 2011 [J], Rock and Soil Mechanics, 36, 4, pp. 1102-1118, (2015)
  • [3] Wu C Z, Chu J, Cheng L, Et al., Advances of ground improvement with MICP-based biogrouting[J], Chinese Journal of Ground Improvement, 2, 3, pp. 181-186, (2020)
  • [4] He J, Chu J, Ivanov V., Mitigation of liquefaction of saturated sand using biogas[J], Géotechnique, 63, 4, pp. 267-275, (2013)
  • [5] Chaney R C., Saturation effects on the cyclic strength of sands, Earthquake Engineering and Soil Dynamics, 1, pp. 342-358, (1978)
  • [6] Yoshimi Y, Tanaka K, Tokimatsu K., Liquefaction resistance of a partially saturated sand [J], Soils and Foundations, 29, 3, pp. 157-162, (1989)
  • [7] Xia H, Hu T., Effects of saturation and back pressure on sand liquefaction [J], Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 117, 9, pp. 1347-1362, (1991)
  • [8] Okamura M, Soga Y., Effects of pore fluid compressibility on liquefaction resistance of partially saturated sand[J], Soils and Foundations, 46, 5, pp. 695-700, (2006)
  • [9] Ma J, Song X R, Li L., Effect of carbon source on nitrite accumulation and pH value of effluent during denitrification process [J], China Environmental Science, 34, 10, pp. 2556-2561, (2014)
  • [10] Wang H Y, Ma F, Su J F, Et al., Influence of carbon source and C/N ratio on nitrogen removal of aerobic denitrifier [J], Acta Scientiae Circumstantiae, 27, 6, pp. 968-972, (2007)