Three-dimensional seismic resilience quantification framework for the urban gas network

被引：0
|
作者：
Zong C.-C. [1 ,2 ]
Ji K. [1 ,2 ]
Wen R.-Z. [1 ,2 ]
Bi X.-R. [1 ,2 ]
Zhang X.-R. [3 ]
机构：
[1] Institute of Engineering Mechanics, China Earthquake Administration, Harbin
[2] Key Laboratory of Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration, China Earthquake Administration, Harbin
[3] Beijing Gas and Heating Engineering Design Institute Co., Ltd, Beijing
来源：
Gongcheng Lixue/Engineering Mechanics | 2021年 / 38卷 / 02期
关键词：
Gas network; Performance recovery curve; Quantitative index of resilience; Seismic resilience; Uncertainty;
D O I：
10.6052/j.issn.1000-4750.2020.04.0219
中图分类号：
学科分类号：
摘要：
In order to comprehensively evaluate the seismic resilience of the urban gas network, this paper proposes a quantitative assessment framework in three dimensions: technical, organizational and social dimensions, which accounts for the uncertainties in ground motion input and includes network connectivity performance assessment and repair process. The connectivity of the gas network is calculated based on Monte Carlo simulation which uses the ground motion prediction equation (GMPE) as input. Then the real-time repair process of the gas network is obtained by randomly allocating the repair resource under each simulated damage condition. The performance recovery curve in three dimensions is given, and the corresponding indices such as post-earthquake performance, repair rate and resilience are calculated. Repeating the above steps N times, the expectation of the above indicators and the probability distribution of the recovery time for different performance levels are obtained. Taking a northern city of China as an example, the whole procedure is applied to assess the seismic resilience of a gas network system. The results show that the post-earthquake performance of the gas network in three dimensions roughly follows the normal distribution, and the performance recovery time for 75%, 90%, and 100% original performance levels in organizational and social dimensions roughly follows log-normal distribution. Neglecting the connectivity of the pipe network, the resilience results in technical dimension underestimate the actual damage level, and the recovery curve is close to linear-type. On the other hand, the results in organizational and social dimensions are close to the reality, and are greatly affected by repair order and resource allocation. The proposed seismic resilience quantification procedure comprehensively considers the uncertainty of various aspects after the earthquake, which can provide a reference framework for probabilistic resilience assessment of gas networks, and could be expanded to other lifeline network systems. Copyright ©2021 Engineering Mechanics. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码：146 / 156
页数：10
相关论文
共 23 条
  • [1] Lu Xinzheng, Zeng Xiang, Xu Zhen, Et al., The challenge faced by building a resilient city in earthquake, City and Disaster Reduction, 4, pp. 33-38, (2017)
  • [2] Zhai Changhai, Liu Wen, Xie Lili, Progress of research on city seismic resilience evaluation, Journal of Building Structures, 39, 9, pp. 1-9, (2018)
  • [3] Wang X J, Guo E D, Zhang M J., Analysis and countermeasures on seismic damages of gas pipeline network in Wenchuan earthquake, Advanced Materials Research Trans Tech Publications, 194, pp. 1938-1942, (2011)
  • [4] Bruneau M, Chang S E, Eguchi R T, Et al., A framework to quantitatively assess and enhance the seismic resilience of communities, Earthquake Spectra, 19, 4, pp. 733-752, (2003)
  • [5] Cimellaro G P, Reinhorn A M, Bruneau M., Framework for analytical quantification of disaster resilience, Engineering Structures, 32, 11, pp. 3639-3649, (2010)
  • [6] Fang Dongping, Li Quanwang, Li Nan, Et al., An evaluation system for community seismic resilience and its application in a typical community, Engineering Mechanics, 37, 10, pp. 28-44, (2020)
  • [7] Shang Qingxue, Li Jichao, Wang Tao, Indicators system used in seismic resilience assessment of hospital system, Engineering Mechanics, 36, pp. 106-110, (2019)
  • [8] Poljansek K, Bono F, Gutierrez E., Seismic risk assessment of interdependent critical infrastructure systems: The case of European gas and electricity networks, Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 41, 1, pp. 61-79, (2012)
  • [9] Esposito S, Iervolino I, d'Onofrio A, Et al., Simulation-based seismic risk assessment of gas distribution networks, Computer-Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering, 30, 7, pp. 508-523, (2015)
  • [10] Cimellaro G P, Stefano A D, Villa O., Serviceability of natural gas distribution networks after earthquakes, Journal of Earthquake and Tsunami, 7, 2, pp. 137-146, (2013)
123