Modelling the Banni social-ecological system using participatory system dynamics for building insights on invasive species management and stakeholder engagement

被引:0
|
作者
Sharma, Kabir [1 ]
Mathur, Mihir [1 ]
Hiremath, Ankila J. [2 ]
Vanak, Abi T. [2 ,3 ]
Ravi, Ramya [2 ]
Niphadkar, Madhura [2 ,5 ]
Thorat, Ovee [2 ]
Jagdish, Ninad [4 ]
机构
[1] DESTA Res LLP, 28 Munirka Vihar, New Delhi 110067, India
[2] Royal Enclave, Ashoka Trust Res Ecol & Environm ATREE, Jakkur Post, Bangalore 560064, Karnataka, India
[3] Univ KwaZulu Natal, Sch Life Sci, Univ Rd,Private Bag 1054001, ZA-4000 Durban, South Africa
[4] BTN Pte Ltd, 160 Robinson Rd,14-04, Singapore 068914, Singapore
[5] Wildlife Conservat Trust WCT, Mumbai, India
关键词
Social-ecological systems; System dynamics; Participatory modelling; Grasslands; Invasive species; Restoration; Climate change adaptation; SUSTAINABILITY; SCIENCE;
D O I
10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.122899
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Invasive species are a significant driver of environmental change in social-ecological systems (SES) globally. Given that SES are inherently complex adaptive systems (CAS), they continuously reorganize themselves and adapt to change, including changes in ecological composition, as well as in associated lives and livelihoods. Decision-making on invasive species management in such systems can be contested and fraught with tradeoffs. The Banni Grasslands in Kutch, India, is one such system where the introduction of Prosopis juliflora (P.juliflora), an invasive woody species, has over decades resulted in deeply coupled social-ecological change. Removal of P. juliflora for land restoration is as of date a contested policy choice. Through a participatory transdisciplinary process comprising workshops and consultations with the local community (Maldharis), civil society and researchers involved in long term research on Banni, a system dynamics simulation model was developed which synthesizes the SES dynamics as a set of feedback loops. The model was used to simulate 'what-if' scenarios of interest up to 2050, to study consequences of restoration and the impact of climate extremes, to generate insights which could be useful in aiding decision making. The runs show how vis-a`-vis a Business-As-Usual Scenario, restoration could help Maldharis increase livestock populations and livestock income, although there would still be a limit to the growth, with livestock reaching a higher normal. The runs show how it would also mean a loss in the P. juliflora-dependent charcoal-based income and livelihoods, and the extent of the loss, raising the question of finding alternative livelihoods. In a climate extremes scenario, the system, being more resource-intensive owing to growing livestock population, and loss of the relatively climate proof P. julilfora-based income, counterintuitively shows higher sensitivity to climate change impacts resulting in more pronounced impact on income variation. In order to engage stakeholders via 'live' simulation and scenario building, a user-friendly app encoding the simulation model was developed and used to carry out a participatory scenario planning exercise with the community to allow for live appraisal of the scenarios and their implications for decision-making. The paper summarizes insights from the simulation runs and from taking the app back to the community.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Participatory modelling for conceptualizing social-ecological system dynamics in the Bangladesh delta
    Md Sarwar Hossain
    Jorge Ramirez
    Sylvia Szabo
    Felix Eigenbrod
    Fiifi Amoako Johnson
    Chinwe Ifejika Speranza
    John A Dearing
    Regional Environmental Change, 2020, 20
  • [2] Participatory modelling for conceptualizing social-ecological system dynamics in the Bangladesh delta
    Hossain, Md Sarwar
    Ramirez, Jorge
    Szabo, Sylvia
    Eigenbrod, Felix
    Johnson, Fiifi Amoako
    Speranza, Chinwe Ifejika
    Dearing, John A.
    REGIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGE, 2020, 20 (01)
  • [3] Participatory Management of a Mediterranean Lagoon Complex Social-Ecological System Using Intuitionistic Fuzzy TOPSIS
    Mirli, Anastasia
    Bakas, Thomas
    Latinopoulos, Dionissis
    Kagalou, Ifigenia
    Spiliotis, Mike
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2024, 16 (23)
  • [4] Exploring social-ecological dynamics of a coral reef resource system using participatory modeling and empirical data
    Leenhardt, Pierre
    Stelzenmueller, Vanessa
    Pascal, Nicolas
    Probst, Wolfgang Nikolaus
    Aubanel, Annie
    Bambridge, Tamatoa
    Charles, Mahe
    Clua, Eric
    Feral, Francois
    Quinquis, Bran
    Salvat, Bernard
    Claudet, Joachim
    MARINE POLICY, 2017, 78 : 90 - 97
  • [5] Developing social-ecological system indicators using group model building
    Vugteveen, Pim
    Rouwette, Etienne
    Stouten, Hendrik
    van Katwijk, Marieke M.
    Hanssen, Lucien
    OCEAN & COASTAL MANAGEMENT, 2015, 109 : 29 - 39
  • [6] Stakeholder engagement in participatory research in French marine and freshwater social-ecological systems: A systematic map protocol
    Chevallier, Adrien
    Balti, Heikel
    Gourguet, Sophie
    Macher, Claire
    Shin, Yunne-Jai
    Moullec, Fabien
    ECOLOGICAL SOLUTIONS AND EVIDENCE, 2024, 5 (01):
  • [7] Integrating social-ecological outcomes into invasive species management: the Tamarix case
    Gonzalez-Sargas, Eduardo
    Shafroth, Patrick B.
    Baro, Francesc
    NEOBIOTA, 2024, 92 : 173 - 192
  • [8] Scale misperceptions and the spatial dynamics of a social-ecological system
    Wilson, J
    Low, B
    Costanza, R
    Ostrom, E
    ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 1999, 31 (02) : 243 - 257
  • [9] Building robustness for rural revitalization: A social-ecological system perspective
    Chu, Vivian H. Y.
    Lam, Wai-Fung
    Williams, Jessica M.
    JOURNAL OF RURAL STUDIES, 2023, 101
  • [10] Social-ecological system approaches for water resources management
    Gain, Animesh K.
    Hossain, Md. Sarwar
    Benson, David
    Di Baldassarre, Giuliano
    Giupponi, Carlo
    Huq, Nazmul
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT AND WORLD ECOLOGY, 2021, 28 (02): : 109 - 124