A self-adaptive cavitation model based on Omega vortex identification theory

被引:0
|
作者
Qu N. [1 ]
Xu K. [1 ]
Xiang L. [1 ]
Lin R. [1 ,2 ]
Dang X. [1 ]
机构
[1] Xi’an Aerospace Propulsion Institute, Xi’an
[2] Science and Technology on Liquid Rocket Engine Laboratory, Xi’an Aerospace Propulsion Institute, Xi’an
来源
关键词
Attached cavitation; Cavitation model; Omega vortex identification; Phase-transition coefficient; Tip leakage vortex cavitation;
D O I
10.13675/j.cnki.tjjs.2210076
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
There are many complex types of cavitation in the turbopump of liquid rocket engine,and the occurrence mechanism is different. The existing cavitation numerical calculation methods usually use a set of models to predict all types of cavitation,which has certain deficiencies in the prediction accuracy of cavitation. To improve the calculation accuracy of complex cavitation flow,a self-adaptive cavitation model was proposed. Based on the advanced Omega vortex identification theory and ZGB cavitation model,a self-adaptive adjustment method for phase-transition coefficient was established. Two types of typical cavitation(attached cavitation and leakage vortex cavitation)in turbopumps were taken as the research objects,and the simulation method was verified by hydrofoil experiment data. Firstly,the differences of several vortex identification methods were compared. The result suggests Omega method is not sensitive to threshold and has clear physical meaning,which can be used as the value basis of the phase-transition coefficient. The effect of phase transition coefficient on attached cavitation and leakage vortex cavitation and mechanism of these two cavitations were analysed. The results show that compared with the ZGB model,the prediction accuracy of the self-adaptive model for leakage vortex cavitation is improved by 181% in the case of large clearance and 27% in the case of small clearance. The prediction of attached cavitation is closer to the experimental results. Attached cavitation is the reason of vortex shedding on suction surface. The vortex band and the shear layer cavitation of tip leakage flowfield are formed by the interaction of tip leakage vortex and separation vortex. © 2024 Journal of Propulsion Technology. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 28 条
  • [1] CHEN H, ZHANG E Z,, Et al., Rotating cavitation of the high-speed rotational inducer of LPRE [J], Journal of Propulsion Technology, 30, 4, pp. 390-395, (2009)
  • [2] 50, 12, pp. 125-132, (2019)
  • [3] DREYER M, Et al., Mind the gap:a new insight into the tip leakage vortex using stereo-PIV[J], Experiments in Fluids, 55, 11, pp. 1-13, (2014)
  • [4] LEROUX J B, BILIARD J Y., An experimental study of unsteady partial cavitation[J], Journal of Fluids Engineering, 126, 2, pp. 94-101, (2004)
  • [5] KUBOTA A, KATO H, YAMAGUCHI H., A new modeling of cavitation flows:a numerical study of unsteady cavitation on a hydrofoil section[J], Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 240, 1, pp. 59-96, (1992)
  • [6] KUNZ R F, STINEBRING D R,, Et al., A preconditioned Navier-Stokes method for two-phase flows with application to cavitation prediction[J], Computers and Fluids, 29, 8, pp. 849-875, (2000)
  • [7] SINGHAL A K, ATHAVALE M M,, LI H, Et al., Mathematical basis and validation of the full cavitation model [J], Journal of Fluids Engineering, 124, 3, pp. 617-624, (2002)
  • [8] ZWART P J, GERBER A G,, BELAMRI T., A two-phase flow model for predicting cavitation dynamics[C], Yokohama:Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Multiphase Flow, (2004)
  • [9] MORGUT M, BILUS I., Comparison of mass transfer models for the numerical prediction of sheet cavitation around a hydrofoil[J], International Journal of Multiphase Flow, 37, 6, pp. 620-626, (2011)
  • [10] 2, pp. 175-182, (2012)