Knowledge Mapping of Cultural Ecosystem Services Applied on Blue-Green Infrastructure-A Scientometric Review with CiteSpace

被引:1
|
作者
Li, Jinfeng [1 ]
Xu, Haiyun [1 ]
Ren, Mujie [2 ]
Duan, Jiaxuan [1 ]
You, Weiwen [1 ]
Zhou, Yuan [1 ]
机构
[1] Beijing Univ Civil Engn & Architecture, Sch Architecture & Urban Planning, Beijing 100044, Peoples R China
[2] Univ Sydney, Camperdown, NSW 2050, Australia
来源
FORESTS | 2024年 / 15卷 / 10期
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
cultural ecosystem services; ecosystem services; blue-green infrastructure; knowledge graph; information visualization; CiteSpace; BIBLIOMETRIC ANALYSIS; NATURES CONTRIBUTIONS; URBAN; VALUES; HEALTH; BENEFITS; CITIES; SPACE; BIODIVERSITY; PERCEPTIONS;
D O I
10.3390/f15101736
中图分类号
S7 [林业];
学科分类号
0829 ; 0907 ;
摘要
Urban blue-green infrastructure (BGI) not only serves an ecological purpose but also contributes to the physical and psychological well-being of residents by providing cultural ecosystem services (CES), which are the nonmaterial benefits people obtain from ecosystems through spiritual enrichment, cognitive development, reflection, recreation, and aesthetic experiences. CES is a rising BGI research and management subject, with a growing number of papers in recent years. To identify and differentiate the latest research on the development of features based on cultural ecosystem services within blue-green infrastructure, we employed CiteSpace bibliometric methodologies to analyze pertinent papers for focusing on the developmental processes and key research areas. The publishing trend, research clusters, highly cited literature, research history, research frontiers and hot areas, and high-frequency and emerging keywords were studied and assessed after reviewing 14,344 relevant papers by CiteSpace software 6.3.1 from Web of Science. The standard domains concerned, according to the keyword visualization and high-value references, are implemented cultural ecosystem services assessment combined with natural-based solutions in green spaces, urban regions, residential areas, and sustainable development. In conclusion, the following recommendations are made: (1) When urban decision-makers incorporate the perspective of cultural ecosystem services into the strategic formulation of BGI, a broader spectrum of urban BGI types should be taken into account; (2) all categories of CES should be considered; (3) research on the application of cultural ecosystem services in urban blue-green infrastructure should be more effectively and flexibly integrated into urban governance; and (4) CES should be strategically employed to improve the physical health and psychological well-being of urban residents.
引用
收藏
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Ecosystem service delivery by urban agriculture and green infrastructure-a systematic review
    Evans, D. L.
    Falagan, N.
    Hardman, C. A.
    Kourmpetli, S.
    Liu, L.
    Mead, B. R.
    Davies, J. A. C.
    ECOSYSTEM SERVICES, 2022, 54
  • [2] Neighbour perspectives on cultural ecosystem services of blue-green infrastructures: The ecovillage Hannover, Germany
    Noblega-Carriquiry, Andrea
    March, Hug
    Sauri, David
    Hack, Jochen
    ECOSYSTEM SERVICES, 2025, 72
  • [3] A review of empirical studies of cultural ecosystem services in urban green infrastructure
    Cheng, Xin
    Van Damme, Sylvie
    Uyttenhove, Pieter
    Journal of Environmental Management, 2021, 293
  • [4] A review of empirical studies of cultural ecosystem services in urban green infrastructure
    Cheng, Xin
    Van Damme, Sylvie
    Uyttenhove, Pieter
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2021, 293
  • [5] Knowledge Mapping of Machine Learning Approaches Applied in Agricultural Management-A Scientometric Review with CiteSpace
    Zhang, Jingyi
    Liu, Jiaxin
    Chen, Yaqi
    Feng, Xiaochun
    Sun, Zilai
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2021, 13 (14)
  • [6] A review of studies assessing ecosystem services provided by urban green and blue infrastructure
    Veerkamp, Clara J.
    Schipper, Aafke M.
    Hedlund, Katarina
    Lazarova, Tanya
    Nordin, Amanda
    Hanson, Helena I.
    ECOSYSTEM SERVICES, 2021, 52
  • [7] Bottom-up thinking Identifying socio-cultural values of ecosystem services in local blue-green infrastructure planning in Helsinki, Finland
    Kati, Vierikko
    Jari, Niemela
    LAND USE POLICY, 2016, 50 : 537 - 547
  • [8] Regulating and Cultural Ecosystem Services of Urban Green Infrastructure in the Nordic Countries: A Systematic Review
    Amorim, Jorge H.
    Engardt, Magnuz
    Johansson, Christer
    Ribeiro, Isabel
    Sannebro, Magnus
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2021, 18 (03) : 1 - 19
  • [9] A systematic review on the ecosystem services provided by green infrastructure
    Jato-Espino, Daniel
    Capra-Ribeiro, Fabio
    Moscardo, Vanessa
    Mayor-Vitoria, Fernando
    Gallardo, Laura O.
    Carracedo, Patricia
    Dietrich, Kristin
    URBAN FORESTRY & URBAN GREENING, 2023, 86
  • [10] Ecosystem services mapping for green infrastructure planning-The case of Tehran
    Ramyar, Reza
    Saeedi, Saeed
    Bryant, Margaret
    Davatgar, Amirhossein
    Hedjri, Golandam Mortaz
    SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2020, 703