Ensemble learning prediction model for rapeseed flowering periods incorporating virtual sample generation

被引:0
|
作者
Xie, Qianwei [1 ]
Xue, Fengchang [1 ]
Chen, Jianfei [2 ]
机构
[1] Meteorological Disaster Geographic Information Engineering Laboratory, Nanjing University of Information Science & Technology, Nanjing,210044, China
[2] Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region Lightning Protection Center, Nanning,530000, China
关键词
Decision trees;
D O I
10.11975/j.issn.1002-6819.202404106
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Linear regression cannot fully reveal the complex non-linear relationships among influencing factors and scarce samples in the flowering period. In this study, ensemble learning was proposed to predict the flowering periods of rapeseed. The generation of virtual samples was also incorporated. The rapeseed in full bloom and meteorological data was utilized in Longyou County, Quzhou City, Zhejiang Province, China from 1998 to 2023. The original samples were expanded using Gaussian Mixture Model-based Virtual Sample Generation and Cubic Spline Interpolation. Two new datasets were obtained, each of which contained 985 samples. The models were established using eight machine learning methods: Random Forest (RF), Kernel Ridge Regression (KRR), Ridge Regression (RR), Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (Lasso), Support Vector Regression (SVR), Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost), Light Gradient Boosting Machine (LightGBM), and Gradient Boosting Decision Tree (GBDT). Hyperparameter optimization was conducted using a Bayesian optimizer. Finally, a prediction model was established for the rapeseed flowering period using stacking ensemble learning. The vast majority of models demonstrated superior performance on the Cubic interpolation dataset, compared with the original and GMM-VSG dataset. Specifically, the RF model was achieved in an RMSE of 0.679 d, an MAE of 0.351 d, and an R2 of 0.990, indicating significant improvements, compared with the original dataset with an RMSE of 6.286 d, an MAE of 5.028 d, and an R2 of 0.201, as well as the GMM-VSG dataset with an RMSE of 2.680 d, an MAE of 1.588 d, and an R2 of 0.881. Additionally, the SVR model also performed better on the Cubic dataset, with an RMSE of 0.849 d, an MAE of 0.333 d, and an R2 of 0.984, indicating a better performance than before. LightGBM as an ensemble learning was performed the best on the Cubic dataset, with the lowest RMSE of 0.613 d MAE of 0.336 d, and the highest R2 of 0.992. The strong feature learning and noise resistance were verified to capture the complex relationships within the dataset. In contrast, there was no significant improvement of Lasso and RR models on the Cubic dataset. For instance, Lasso exhibited an RMSE of 3.879 d and an MAE of 3.054 d on the Cubic dataset. There was a relative decrease in the error, compared with the original RMSE of 6.329 d and MAE of 5.567 d. There was a substantial gap relative to other models. Five models were developed using the Stacking ensemble learning approach: SRX_L, All_L, SLL_L, SRL_L, and SRK_L. Among them, the SRX_L model performed the best across various metrics. The highest R2 value of 0.999 7 was achieved with the lowest RMSE and MAE values among all models, at 0.122 7 d and 0.105 6 d, respectively. There was a general consistency in the actual and predicted flowering trends, in terms of the fitting flowering period. The high predictive accuracy was also obtained over most years, particularly in 2001, 2011, and 2014. Among them, the prediction closely matched the actual data with minimal discrepancies, sometimes less than 0.01 or even approaching zero. However, there were some years with the larger differences, such as 1999 and 2023. Particularly, the year 1999 experienced the largest discrepancy, where the error was 0.442 1 d. The maximum actual flowering period occurred in 2005, reaching 92 days, with an error between the predicted and actual values of 0.041 6 d. The minimum actual flowering period was observed in 2020, at 63 days, with an error between the predicted and actual values of 0.132 5 d. Therefore, the model can be expected to highly accurately predict the extreme values. The virtual sample generation can also be suitable for small datasets. The predictive accuracy and generalizability of the improved model were significantly enhanced to reduce the costs and challenges of data collection. Compared with single machine learning, Stacking ensemble learning can substantially improve the predictive performance. Stacking ensemble learning is well-suited to complex tasks with nonlinear relationships, such as the flowering periods of rapeseed. © 2024 Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:159 / 167
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Machine learning seismic reservoir prediction method based on virtual sample generation
    Kai-Heng Sang
    Xing-Yao Yin
    Fan-Chang Zhang
    Petroleum Science, 2021, 18 (06) : 1662 - 1674
  • [2] Machine learning seismic reservoir prediction method based on virtual sample generation
    Sang, Kai-Heng
    Yin, Xing-Yao
    Zhang, Fan-Chang
    PETROLEUM SCIENCE, 2021, 18 (06) : 1662 - 1674
  • [3] Machine learning seismic reservoir prediction method based on virtual sample generation
    Kai-Heng Sang
    Xing-Yao Yin
    Fan-Chang Zhang
    Petroleum Science, 2021, (06) : 1662 - 1674
  • [4] Virtual Sample Generation and Ensemble Learning Based Image Source Identification With Small Training Samples
    Wu, Shiqi
    Wang, Bo
    Zhao, Jianxiang
    Zhao, Mengnan
    Zhong, Kun
    Guo, Yanqing
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF DIGITAL CRIME AND FORENSICS, 2021, 13 (03) : 34 - 46
  • [5] Virtual sample generation empowers machine learning-based effluent prediction in constructed wetlands
    Dong, Qiyu
    Bai, Shunwen
    Wang, Zhen
    Zhao, Xinyue
    Yang, Shanshan
    Ren, Nanqi
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2023, 346
  • [6] Improving Virtual Sample Generation for Small Sample Learning with Dependent Attributes
    Lin, Liang-Sian
    Li, Der-Chiang
    Pan, Chih-Wei
    PROCEEDINGS 2016 5TH IIAI INTERNATIONAL CONGRESS ON ADVANCED APPLIED INFORMATICS IIAI-AAI 2016, 2016, : 715 - 718
  • [7] An Ensemble Learning Model for Agricultural Irrigation Prediction
    Chen, Yan-An
    Hsieh, Wen-Hao
    Ko, Yu-Shuo
    Huang, Nen-Fu
    35TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INFORMATION NETWORKING (ICOIN 2021), 2021, : 311 - 316
  • [8] Applying virtual sample generation and ensemble modeling for improving the spectral diagnosis of cancer
    Chen, Hui
    Tan, Chao
    Lin, Zan
    Chen, Maoxian
    Cheng, Bin
    SPECTROCHIMICA ACTA PART A-MOLECULAR AND BIOMOLECULAR SPECTROSCOPY, 2024, 318
  • [9] Improving small sample prediction performance via novel nonlinear interpolation virtual sample generation with self-supervised learning
    Lin, Liang-Sian
    INFORMATION SCIENCES, 2024, 678
  • [10] Tr-Predictior: An Ensemble Transfer Learning Model for Small-Sample Cloud Workload Prediction
    Liu, Chunhong
    Jiao, Jie
    Li, Weili
    Wang, Jingxiong
    Zhang, Junna
    ENTROPY, 2022, 24 (12)