Ultrasonographically Measured Rectus Femoris Cross-sectional Area might Predict Osteosarcopenia

被引:0
|
作者
Safer, Vildan Binay [1 ]
Catikkas, Nezahat Muge [2 ]
Bas, Suleyman [3 ]
Gunay, Deniz Sevindik [2 ]
Durak, Ayfer [2 ]
Utku, Irem Kirac [2 ]
Safer, Umut [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hlth Sci Istanbul, Hamidiye Fac Med, Dept Phys Med & Rehabil,Phys Med & Rehabil, Sancaktepe Prof Dr Ilhan Varank Training & Res Hos, TR-34785 Istanbul, Turkiye
[2] Univ Hlth Sci Istanbul, Sancaktepe Prof Dr Ilhan Varank & Res Hosp, Dept Internal Med, Div Geriatr,Hamidiye Fac Med, Istanbul, Turkiye
[3] Univ Hlth Sci Istanbul, Sancaktepe Prof Dr Ilhan Varank Training & Res Hos, Hamidiye Fac Med, Dept Internal Med,Div Geriatr, TR-34785 Istanbul, Turkiye
关键词
Biceps brachii; Cross-sectional area; Osteosarcopenia; Rectus femoris; Ultrasonography; Muscle thickness; MUSCLE THICKNESS; THIGH MUSCLE; SARCOPENIA; ULTRASOUND; MASS;
D O I
10.2174/0115734056275133231211115630
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Aim: We have aimed to investigate the role of ultrasonographic muscle parameters (UMP) in predicting osteosarcopenia in bedridden patients in a palliative care center. Background: The role of ultrasound has not been evaluated in predicting osteosarcopenia. Objective: Reduced muscle thickness (MT) and cross-sectional area (CSA) have often been observed in individuals with sarcopenia, reflecting muscle loss and atrophy. Meanwhile, the potential role of muscle ultrasound has not been evaluated in predicting osteosarcopenia. Methods: We have conducted a prospective, observational study between January 2021 and 2022. We have recorded the demographics, comorbidities, and nutritional status by using the mini nutritional assessment-short form. We measured handgrip strength with a hand dynamometer and the muscle mass with dual X-ray absorptiometry. Sarcopenia was defined by the European Working Group on Sarcopenia in Older People 2 criteria. Osteoporosis was diagnosed according to the World Health Organization criteria. We have categorized the body phenotypes into four groups: "non-sarcopenic non-osteoporotic," "sarcopenic alone," "osteoporotic alone," and "sarcopenic osteoporotic." We have measured the subcutaneous fat thickness (SFT), MT, and CSA of the rectus femoris (RF) and biceps brachii (BB) via ultrasonography. A multivariate regression analysis was performed and area under curve (AUC) values were used to evaluate the accuracy of UMPs. Results: We included 31 patients (mean age: 74.6 +/- 12.1 years, 54.8%: male). The prevalences of sarcopenia, osteoporosis, and sarcopenic osteoporosis were 71%, 48.4%, and 41.9%, respectively. Only the "sarcopenic osteoporotic" phenotype was negatively correlated with all UMPs. In the regression analysis, only the "sarcopenic osteoporotic" phenotype was independently associated with RFCSA (ss=-0.456, p= 0.024). The AUC for all patients was >0.700. Conclusion: RFCSA measurement might be useful in the screening for osteosarcopenia. This has been the first study investigating the relationship between UMPs and body phenotypes. Multi-center and large-scale studies are, however, needed.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Reliability of the rectus femoris muscle cross-sectional area measurements by ultrasonography
    e Lima, Kelly M. M.
    da Matta, Thiago T.
    de Oliveira, Liliam F.
    CLINICAL PHYSIOLOGY AND FUNCTIONAL IMAGING, 2012, 32 (03) : 221 - 226
  • [2] Impact of Changes in Rectus Femoris Cross-Sectional Area Measured by Ultrasound on the Prognosis of Patients With Acute Heart Failure
    Matsuo, Koji
    Yoneki, Kei
    Kobayashi, Kikka
    Onoda, Daiki
    Mibu, Kazuhiro
    Furuzono, Kento
    Mashimo, Noa
    Yasuda, Shiori
    Suzuki, Toru
    Nakao, Ken
    Tatsuki, Hiroaki
    Tamiya, Seiji
    CIRCULATION JOURNAL, 2024, 88 (05) : 713 - 721
  • [3] Longitudinal change in ultrasound measurement of rectus femoris cross-sectional area in COPD
    Labey, Alex
    Canavan, J. L.
    Nolan, C. M.
    Jones, S. E.
    Kon, S. S. C.
    Polkey, M. I.
    Maddocks, M.
    Man, W. D. C.
    EUROPEAN RESPIRATORY JOURNAL, 2016, 48
  • [4] Ultrasound Assessment of the Rectus Femoris Cross-Sectional Area: Subject Position Implications
    Hacker, Eileen Danaher
    Peters, Tara
    Garkova, Miglena
    WESTERN JOURNAL OF NURSING RESEARCH, 2016, 38 (09) : 1221 - 1230
  • [5] RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN QUADRICEPS RECTUS FEMORIS ANATOMICAL CROSS-SECTIONAL AREA, PHYSIOLOGICAL CROSS-SECTIONAL AREA AND PENNATION ANGLE IN HEALTHY SUBJECTS
    Connolly, B.
    Lunt, A.
    Moxham, J.
    Hart, N.
    THORAX, 2011, 66 : A97 - A97
  • [6] The Relationship Between Changes In Rmssd And Rectus Femoris Cross-sectional Area Following Exercise
    Kopec, Thomas J.
    Welborn, Bailey A.
    Leeper, James E.
    Hibberd, Elizabeth E.
    Bishop, Phillip A.
    Richardson, Mark T.
    Esco, Michael R.
    MEDICINE AND SCIENCE IN SPORTS AND EXERCISE, 2017, 49 (05): : 901 - 902
  • [7] Rectus femoris cross-sectional area in COPD: are there functionally relevant cut-points?
    Patel, Suhani
    Nolan, Claire M.
    Barker, Ruth E.
    Jones, Sarah E.
    Maddocks, Matthew M.
    Kon, Samantha S. C.
    Polkey, Michael I.
    Man, William D-C
    EUROPEAN RESPIRATORY JOURNAL, 2017, 50
  • [8] Ultrasound measurement of rectus femoris cross-sectional area and the relationship with quadriceps strength in COPD
    Seymour, J. M.
    Ward, K.
    Sidhu, P. S.
    Puthucheary, Z.
    Steier, J.
    Jolley, C. J.
    Rafferty, G.
    Polkey, M. I.
    Moxham, J.
    THORAX, 2009, 64 (05) : 418 - 423
  • [9] Longitudinal change in ultrasound-derived rectus femoris cross-sectional area in COPD
    Jenkins, Timothy O.
    Patel, Suhani
    Edwards, George D.
    Nolan, Claire M.
    Canavan, Jane
    Kon, Samantha
    Jones, Sarah
    Barker, Ruth E.
    Littlemore, Hannah
    Maddocks, Matthew
    Man, William D-C.
    ERJ OPEN RESEARCH, 2024, 10 (04)
  • [10] Intra- and interobserver agreement of rectus femoris cross-sectional area in critically ill patients
    Hrdy, Ondrej
    Vrbica, Kamil
    Kovar, Marek
    Korbicka, Tomas
    Gal, Roman
    MINERVA ANESTESIOLOGICA, 2021, 87 (04) : 494 - 495