Research Progress of Temporal Planning Techniques for Spacecraft

被引:0
|
作者
Li Z.-Y. [1 ,2 ]
Xu R. [1 ,2 ]
Zeng H. [3 ]
Zhu S.-Y. [1 ,2 ]
Liang Z.-X. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] School of Aerospace Engineering, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing
[2] Key Laboratory of Autonomous Navigation and Control for Deep Space Exploration, Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, Beijing
[3] Institute of Manned Space System Engineering, China Academy of Space Technology, Beijing
来源
Yuhang Xuebao/Journal of Astronautics | 2021年 / 42卷 / 05期
关键词
Mission planning; Spacecraft autonomy; Temporal constraints; Temporal planning;
D O I
10.3873/j.issn.1000-1328.2021.05.001
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Combined with the urgent need for autonomous operation of spacecraft, the challenges posed by spacecraft mission planning issues to intelligent planning techniques are described, and the need for studying temporal properties of planning methods is analyzed emphatically. Given a spacecraft temporal planning definition, the state-space and timeline based temporal planning modeling methods are summarized respectively and the key elements are defined. According to the development of the planning method, the research progress and methodological characteristics of temporal planning techniques are summarized with emphasis on the treatment of the temporal element by various methods in four aspects: forward chain, model transformation, plan-space planning and hierarchical task network methods. Based on the summary analysis and application of current temporal planning techniques on spacecraft, research trends for future spacecraft temporal planning techniques are suggested. © 2021, Editorial Dept. of JA. All right reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:539 / 551
页数:12
相关论文
共 62 条
  • [1] Cui Ping-yuan, Xu Rui, Zhu Sheng-ying, Et al., State of the art and development trends of on-board autonomy technology for deep space explorer, Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 35, 1, pp. 13-28, (2014)
  • [2] Hunt E., GPS: A case study in generality and problem solving, American Mathematical Monthly, 78, 8, (1969)
  • [3] Basseda R, Kifer M., State space planning using transaction logic, The 17th International Symposium on Practical Aspects of Declarative Languages, (2015)
  • [4] Nogueira T, Fratini S, Schilling K., Autonomously controlling flexible timelines: From domain-independent planning to robust execution, 2017 IEEE Aerospace Conference, (2017)
  • [5] Tipaldi M, Glielmo L., A survey on model-based mission planning and execution for autonomous spacecraft, IEEE Systems Journal, 12, 4, pp. 3893-3905, (2017)
  • [6] Barreiro J, Boyce M, Frank J, Et al., EUROPA: A platform for timeline-based AI planning, scheduling, constraint progra-mming, and optimization, Proceedings of ICAPS 2012 Workshop on Planning and Scheduling with Timelines, (2012)
  • [7] Chouinard C, Knight R, Jones G, Et al., Automated and adaptive mission planning for orbital express, Space Operations 2008, (2008)
  • [8] Zetocha P, Sivilli R, Surka D., Intelligent planning systems for space resiliency, AIAA Infotech@ Aerospace, (2015)
  • [9] Fratini S, Cesta A., The APSI framework: A platform for timeline synthesis, Proceedings of the Workshop on Planning and Scheduling with Timelines, (2012)
  • [10] Rendell P, Wallace I, Woods M, Et al., PMOPS: The planetary mission on-board planner and scheduler, Proceedings of the 14th Symposium on Advanced Space Technologies in Robotics and Automation, (2017)