Satellite structure optimization based on high fidelity surrogate model

被引:0
|
作者
Yang L. [1 ]
Kong X. [1 ,2 ]
Li W. [1 ]
Xu H. [1 ]
You C. [1 ]
机构
[1] Shanghai Institute of Satellite Engineering, Shanghai
[2] School of Astronautics, Harbin Institute of Technology, Harbin
来源
关键词
Adaptive simulated annealing (ASA); Algorithm; Dynamic surrogate model; High fidelity; Radial basis function (RBF); Satellite structural optimization;
D O I
10.13465/j.cnki.jvs.2021.23.028
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Here, to improve design quality and computational efficiency of satellite structure optimization, a global optimization method based on high fidelity dynamic surrogate model (HFDSM) was proposed by combining radial basis function (RBF) surrogate model and adaptive simulated annealing (ASA) algorithm. With this method, a search space adaptive updating strategy was constructed according to the global optimization results. After updating search space in optimization process, sample points were added and the near surrogate model was reconstructed. The prediction error of the optimal solution and the decline degree of the objective function were taken as the criteria for the convergence of optimization process to guarantee the global convergence of optimization and the model accuracy at the optimal solution. The optimization results of high-dimensional testing function and I-beam example showed that the proposed method can not only obtain high-precision optimization results, but also significantly improve the efficiency of optimization solving. Finally, the proposed method was used to solve the structural optimization problem of a certain high-dimensional satellite. The optimization results showed that the maximum prediction error of constraint functions, such as, structural fundamental frequency and dynamic response is only 0.65%; time cost is reduced by more than 50% compared with directly using ASA algorithm; very high accuracy and computational efficiency of the proposed method for solving satellite structural design optimization problem are verified. © 2021, Editorial Office of Journal of Vibration and Shock. All right reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:208 / 215and222
相关论文
共 20 条
  • [1] YOON Y H, MOON J K, LEE E S, Et al., Parallel optimal design of satellite bus structures using particle swarm optimization, 48 th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structural Dynamics, and Materials Conference, (2007)
  • [2] XIA Hao, CHEN Changya, WANG Deyu, Dynamical optimization of satellite structure based on multi-objective particle swarm optimization algorithm, Journal of Shanghai Jiao Tong University, 49, 9, pp. 1400-1403, (2015)
  • [3] ZHENG Kan, LIAO Wenhe, ZHANG Xiang, Multi-objective optimization design for microsatellite structure based on approximation model management, China Mechanical Engineering, 23, 6, pp. 655-659, (2012)
  • [4] YUAN Ye, CHEN Changya, WANG Deyu, Multi-objective dynamic optimization of a satellite based on support vector machine, Journal of Vibration and Shock, 32, 22, pp. 189-192, (2013)
  • [5] WANG G G, DONG Z M, AITCHISON P., Adaptive response surface method: a global optimization scheme for approximation-based design problems, Engineering Optimization, 33, 6, pp. 707-733, (2001)
  • [6] WANG G G., Adaptive response surface method using inherited Latin hypercube design points, Journal of Mechanical Design, 125, 2, pp. 210-220, (2003)
  • [7] JONES D R, SCHONLAU M, WELCH W J., Efficient global optimization of expensive black-box functions, Journal of Global Optimization, 13, 4, pp. 455-492, (1998)
  • [8] VIANA F C, HAFTKA R, WATSON L., Efficient global optimization algorithm assisted by multiple surrogate techniques, Journal of Global Optimization, 56, 2, pp. 669-689, (2013)
  • [9] HU W, LI M, AZARM S, Et al., Multi-objective robust optimization under interval uncertainty using online approximation and constraint cuts, Journal of Mechanical Design, 133, 6, (2011)
  • [10] HU W W, AZARM S, ALMANSOORI A., New approximation assisted multi-objective collaborative robust optimization (new AA-McRO) under interval uncertainty, Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 47, 1, pp. 19-35, (2013)