A review of supply chain finance risk assessment research: Based on knowledge graph technology

被引:0
|
作者
Zhu Y. [1 ,3 ]
Jia R. [1 ]
Wang G. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Xie C. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Business School, Hunan University, Changsha
[2] Financial and Investment Research Institute, Hunan University, Changsha
[3] Smart Economy and Digital Society Institute, Hunan University, Changsha
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
big data; deep learning; index system; knowledge graph; supply chain finance;
D O I
10.12011/SETP2022-0815
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Supply chain finance (SCF), as a systematic financial service for all member enterprises in the supply chain, focuses on solving the financing problems of small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs). However, for a long time, the asymmetric information of relevant participants leads to frequent risks, and the risk assessment technology is relatively backward, which makes it difficult to effectively promote the service model. Therefore, the assessment of SCF risk has become a hot issue in the industry and academic circles. In this paper, the related documents of SCF risk assessment are taken as the research object, and knowledge is extracted from 152 Chinese documents and 61 English documents by using knowledge graph technology, and then visual analysis is carried out. On the one hand, the current research status of SCF risk assessment is explored, and it is found that the existing research has one-sided research perspective, single research object, small research data sample, and insufficient research model performance and interpretability. On the other hand, looking ahead to the research trends in SCF risk assessment, the main issues include the following to be explored in depth: 1) How to collect structured, semi-structured and unstructured data from multiple sources, integrate them effectively, and share private data securely? 2) How to mine the SCF risk association knowledge from the massive data generated by Internet economic activities and extract risk features from it, to establish a high-dimensional and fine-grained SCF risk assessment index system? 3) How to use deep learning methods to improve the overall performance of SCF risk assessment models and ensure the interpretability of the models by resolving the importance and marginal effects of risk features? © 2023 Systems Engineering Society of China. All rights reserved.
引用
下载
收藏
页码:795 / 812
页数:17
相关论文
共 106 条
  • [1] Song H, Lu Q., What kind of SMEs can benefit from supply chain finance — From the perspective of network and capability[J], Management World, 6, pp. 104-121, (2017)
  • [2] Liu X, Peng X, Stuart M., Research on risk measurement of supply chain finance based on fractal theory, Fractals: Complex Geometry, Patterns, and Scaling in Nature and Society, 28, 8, (2020)
  • [3] Huang J, Yang W, Tu Y., Financing mode decision in a supply chain with financial constraint, International Journal of Production Economics, 220, (2020)
  • [4] Chai Z M, Huang X., Review of supply chain financial risk management[J], Modernization of Management, 40, 2, pp. 109-115, (2020)
  • [5] Liu D H, Tian Y., Concept and risk management of supply chain finance: A literature review and prospects[J], Economic Problems, 7, pp. 53-60, (2020)
  • [6] 23, 2, pp. 149-154, (2005)
  • [7] Chen Y, Liu Z Y., The rise of mapping knowledge domain[J]. Studies in Science of Science, 2005, 23(2): 149–154. [7] Cobo M J, López-Herrera A G, Herrera-Viedma E, et al. Science mapping software tools: Review, analysis, and cooperative study among tools[J], Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 62, 7, pp. 1382-1402, (2011)
  • [8] Hua L X, Wu Y L., Review and prospect of process mining research based on CNKI bibliometric analysis[J], Chinese Journal of Management, 18, 6, pp. 938-948, (2021)
  • [9] Li X Q, Li B L., Analysis of the evolution of digital innovation research hotspots[J], Journal of Statistics and Information, 37, 5, pp. 115-128, (2022)
  • [10] Wang H F, Zhang X Y, Zu N N., Comparative study on domestic and foreign supply chain finance based on knowledge graph[J], R&D Management, 32, 5, pp. 42-57, (2020)