Status and Trend of Occupational Radiation Exposure in Radiotherapy and Diagnostic X-ray Practices in Bangladesh

被引:0
|
作者
Banik S. [1 ]
Pervin S. [1 ]
Siraz M.M.M. [1 ]
Rahman A.K.M.M. [1 ]
Rahman M.S. [1 ]
Yeasmin S. [1 ]
机构
[1] Health Physics Division, Atomic Energy Centre, Bangladesh Atomic Energy Commission, Dhaka
关键词
Dosimetry; Ionizing; Occupational exposure; Radiation; Radiation protection; Thermoluminescent;
D O I
10.22038/IJMP.2020.51707.1850
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Introduction: The evaluation of occupational exposure and related trends due to external ionizing radiation in diagnostic and therapeutic purposes has become crucial to understanding the implementation of regulatory acts and technological advancement. This study describes the status of occupational radiation exposure in the radiotherapy (RT) and diagnostic X-ray (DR) sector and the comparison with related research. Material and Methods: Overall, 12141 radiation workers were monitored using thermoluminescent dosimeters (TLDs) read-out by Harshaw TLD Reader (Model 4500) on a quarterly basis. Several parameters such as annual collective effective dose, average annual effective dose, collective and individual dose distribution, and the probability of cancer risk were analyzed. Results: The number of monitored workers increased by around 35%, whereas the number of radiation workers who received a measurable amount of doses decreased by around 37% during 2014-2018. The annual average effective doses in RT and DR were in the range of 0.017-0.1112 and 0.076-0.1702 mSv, respectively. The results indicate that more than 94% of the total collective dose was for the non-physician group. Among exposed radiation workers, almost 78% received doses below 1mSv and <1% received doses over 15mSv. The annual average effective dose is five times lower than the worldwide average value. Depending on the average occupational dose, the expected number of radiation-induced cancer cases among the monitored workers is below 1. Conclusion: Dose distribution tends to move towards lower levels and reveals that the majority of the organizations maintain adequate radiation protection. © 2021, Iranian Journal of Medical Physics. All Rights Reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:389 / 396
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] RADIATION EXPOSURE IN DIAGNOSTIC X-RAY DEPARTMENTS
    BOHRER, SP
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 1970, 43 (510): : 429 - &
  • [2] RADIATION EXPOSURE IN DIAGNOSTIC X-RAY DEPARTMENTS
    OLIVER, R
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 1969, 42 (500): : 633 - &
  • [3] Effects of occupational exposure of X-Ray on hematological parameters of diagnostic technicians
    Taqi, Ali H.
    Faraj, Kharman A.
    Zaynal, Sarah A.
    Hameed, Ahmed M.
    Mahmood, Abd-Alkader A.
    RADIATION PHYSICS AND CHEMISTRY, 2018, 147 : 45 - 52
  • [4] RADIATION DOSE TO GONADS FROM DIAGNOSTIC X-RAY EXPOSURE
    LINCOLN, TA
    GUPTON, ED
    JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1958, 166 (03): : 233 - 239
  • [5] Occupational x-ray exposure of anaesthetists
    McGowan, C
    Heaton, B
    Stephenson, RN
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 1996, 76 (06) : 868 - 869
  • [6] Radiation exposure of the German population from X-ray diagnostic procedures
    Bernhardt, JH
    Veit, R
    Bauer, B
    IRPA9 - 1996 INTERNATIONAL CONGRESS ON RADIATION PROTECTION / NINTH INTERNATIONAL CONGRESS OF THE INTERNATIONAL RADIATION PROTECTION ASSOCIATION, PROCEEDINGS, VOL 3, 1996, : C383 - C385
  • [7] X-RAY EXPOSURE AND RADIATION PROTECTION IN X-RAY DIAGNOSTICS
    SCHMIDT, T
    ATOMKERNENERGIE, 1973, 22 (02): : 129 - 133
  • [8] DANGERS OF DIAGNOSTIC X-RAY EXPOSURE
    MORGAN, RH
    POSTGRADUATE MEDICINE, 1961, 29 (05) : 551 - +
  • [9] RADIATION EXPOSURE OF STAFF IN DIAGNOSTIC PROCEDURES .2. RADIATION DOSES RECEIVED BY DIAGNOSTIC X-RAY WORKERS
    OSBORN, SB
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 1955, 28 (336): : 650 - 654
  • [10] Reduction of male gonadal exposure doses due to different diagnostic X-ray procedures in Bangladesh
    Huda, MO
    Alam, B
    Miah, FK
    IRPA9 - 1996 INTERNATIONAL CONGRESS ON RADIATION PROTECTION / NINTH INTERNATIONAL CONGRESS OF THE INTERNATIONAL RADIATION PROTECTION ASSOCIATION, PROCEEDINGS, VOL 3, 1996, : C416 - C416