Multi-dimensional comprehensive evaluation of multi-energy complementary energy system

被引:0
|
作者
Zhao F. [1 ]
Li Q. [1 ]
Zhang Q. [1 ]
Wu M. [2 ]
Qu X. [2 ]
Su J. [1 ]
机构
[1] College of Information and Electrical Engineering, China Agricultural University, Beijing
[2] State Grid Shanghai Energy Internet Research Institute Co., Ltd., Beijing
关键词
Analysis; Comprehensive evaluation; Energy; Evaluation index system; G1-CV maximum deviation comprehensive weighting; Multi-energy complementary energy system; Multi-level matter-element extension evaluation method;
D O I
10.11975/j.issn.1002-6819.2021.17.023
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Low-carbon and sustainable development has drawn much attention in social communities in recent years. The conventional single energy system cannot meet the urgent needs of sustainable energy against the background of energy shortage, due mainly to the low utilization efficiency and many deficiencies in technology. As a result, a multi-energy complementary energy system has emerged at present. It is necessary to fully evaluate the implementation of multi-energy complementary energy system for the economic and social benefits. In this article, a system architecture was first designed, according to the "source-network-load-storage" structure, including energy inputs (such as wind, light, gas, and electricity), load demand for electricity, heat, cold, and gas, as well as energy conversion equipment (such as gas turbines, electric refrigerators, and electric boilers). Then, the demand relationship was established among the three stakeholders: energy suppliers, local governments, and energy users. Five levels were set to be evaluated, including the clean and low-carbon, safe and reliable, energy utilization, high-efficiency economic, and social service level. An evaluation index system was then constructed for the multi-energy complementary energy system, including 5 first-level and 45 second-level indicators. The detailed indicators were defined, such as the proportion of electric heating (gas) replacement time, energy storage equipment (battery, heat storage tank, and gas storage tank) peak shaving capacity, user smart energy participation, and energy business online operation rate. Among them, the G1 was used for the subjective weighting of indicators, while the CV was used for the objective weighting, where the subjective and objective weights were combined, according to the optimal comprehensive weight using the maximizing deviation method. As such, this weighting was adopted the expert opinions, together with the indicator data. The improved multi-level matter-element extension was used to comprehensively evaluate the multi-energy complementary energy system. Finally, the evaluation was implemented using G1-CV maximum deviation comprehensive weighting-multi-level matter-element extension, particularly suitable for the three-level evaluation index system. In addition, an example was selected to verify the evaluation index system. Consequently, the comprehensive evaluation can also be expected to serve the construction and operation for different multi-energy complementary energy systems, further to obtain refined evaluation from various dimensions. This finding can also provide a theoretical guidance for the optimal planning of energy system. © 2021, Editorial Department of the Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering. All right reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:204 / 210
页数:6
相关论文
共 20 条
  • [1] Li Jinliang, Liu Huaidong, Wang Ruizhuo, Et al., Comprehensive efficiency evaluation of integrated energy system based on cross super-efficiency CCR model, Automation of Electric Power Systems, 44, 11, pp. 78-86, (2020)
  • [2] Zhang Shixiang, Lv Shuaikang, Comprehensive energy system evaluation method for park microgrid, Power System Technology, 42, 8, pp. 2431-2439, (2018)
  • [3] Zhang Tao, Zhu Tong, Gao Naiping, Et al., Research on optimal design and multi-index comprehensive evaluation method of distrib uted cooling, heating and power energy system, Proceedings of the Chinese Society of Electrical Engineering, 35, 14, pp. 3706-3713, (2015)
  • [4] Li Yang, Wu Ming, Zhou Haiming, Et al., Discussion on several issues of regional multi-energy system based on all-energy flow model, Power System Technology, 39, 8, pp. 2230-2237, (2015)
  • [5] Chen Bosen, Liao Qingfen, Liu Dichen, Et al., Comprehen sive evaluation index and method of regional integrated energy system, Automation of Electric Power Systems, 42, 4, pp. 174-182, (2018)
  • [6] Li Hong, Wang Xiaodan, Gao Yajing, Et al., Evaluation research of the energy supply system in multi-energy complementary park based on the improved universal generating function method, Energy Conversion and Management, (2018)
  • [7] Dong Fugui, Zhang Ye, Shang Meimei, Research on Multi-index Comprehensive Evaluation of Distributed Energy System, Proceedings of the Chinese Society of Electrical Engineering, 36, 12, pp. 3214-3223, (2016)
  • [8] Tian Liting, Cheng Lin, Li Rong, Et al., Multi-scenario energy efficiency evaluation method for park integrated energy system based on weighted directed graph, Proceedings of the Chinese Society of Electrical Engineering, 39, 22, pp. 6471-6478, (2019)
  • [9] Zhao Pengxiang, Fan Ying, Zhou Xichao, Et al., The evaluation method for the integrated energy system of the park, Power Technology, 44, 9, pp. 1379-1382, (2020)
  • [10] Zhou Huan, Huang Longqiong, Wu Renjian, Et al., Value Evaluation Method of Integrated Energy System Based on Green Energy Economy, Automation of Electric Power Systems, 44, 2, pp. 36-42, (2020)