Evaluation Methods and Indices of the Suitability of Different Peanut Varieties for Boiling

被引:0
|
作者
Zhao, Gengjiu [1 ]
Xiang, Fei [1 ]
Xu, Shaowen [3 ]
Tan, Jiazhuang [4 ]
Wang, Yamei [4 ]
Wang, Qiang [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Comprehensive Utilization Laboratory of Cereal and Oil Processing, Institute of Food Science and Technology, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Beijing,100193, China
[2] Western Agricultural Research Center of Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Xinjiang, Changji,831100, China
[3] Xunxian Agricultural and Rural Bureau, Henan, Hebi,458000, China
[4] Zhanjiang Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Guangdong, Zhanjiang,524094, China
关键词
D O I
10.16429/j.1009-7848.2024.08.038
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Currently, boiled peanut varieties are disordered in the field, the evaluation standard is vague, and the quality of boiled peanuts of different varieties varies dramatically. Evaluation of the suitability of different peanut varieties for boiled peanut processing is urgently necessary, and the corresponding evaluation methods and indicators should be established to provide a reference basis for the evaluation of the suitability of boiled peanut processing and to assist the high-quality development of the boiled peanut industry. In this study, 23 fresh-edible peanuts were fully evaluated for their basic nutrient composition, and quality indicators of boiled peanuts. Hierarchical cluster analysis, correlation analysis and logistic regression model were used to establish the evaluation methods and indices for the suitability of boiled peanut processing, and to screen out the special varieties suitable for boiled processing. The first-grade standard of boiled peanut quality was determined: Boiled peanut pod length 29.13-36.37 mm, pod width 15.38-15.87 mm, hardness 3 137.35-3 363.29 g, protein content 23.01-24.14 g/100 g, sucrose content 3.55-5.19 g/100 g. Five significantly related variables were screened and determined; The contents of fat, protein, sucrose, crude fibre, and arginine at P © 2024 Chinese Institute of Food Science and Technology. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:422 / 434
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Processing suitability of different varieties of sweet potatoes cooked with different methods
    Fan, Huiping
    Liang, Dan
    Fu, Feng
    Xu, Mengyan
    Li, Zhen
    Suo, Biao
    Ai, Zhilu
    JOURNAL OF FOOD PROCESSING AND PRESERVATION, 2022, 46 (11)
  • [2] Juice Processing Suitability Evaluation for Different Varieties of Lotus Root
    Sun H.
    Li J.
    Liu Y.
    Wang L.
    Yan S.
    Journal of Food Science and Technology (China), 2023, 41 (02): : 164 - 174
  • [3] Habitat suitability models based on different habitat suitability evaluation methods
    Yi, Yujun
    Cheng, Xi
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 36TH IAHR WORLD CONGRESS: DELTAS OF THE FUTURE AND WHAT HAPPENS UPSTREAM, 2015, : 874 - 879
  • [4] Suitability Evaluation of Different Citrus Varieties for Whole Fruit Juice Processing
    Li, Qili
    Sun, Junjie
    Shan, Yang
    Fu, Fuhua
    Yang, Ying
    Liu, Wei
    Shipin Kexue/Food Science, 2019, 40 (13): : 36 - 44
  • [5] Suitability Evaluation of Different Varieties of Lotus Rhizome for Lotus Rhizome Balls
    Huang C.
    Li J.
    Liu J.
    Yan S.
    Wang X.
    Science and Technology of Food Industry, 2023, 44 (06) : 283 - 291
  • [6] AFLATOXIN PRODUCTION OF DIFFERENT PEANUT VARIETIES
    VAAMONDE, G
    VARSAVSKY, E
    ANALES DE LA ASOCIACION QUIMICA ARGENTINA, 1979, 67 (04): : 139 - 152
  • [7] The allergen spectrum of different peanut varieties
    Riecken, S.
    Schmidt, H.
    Darcan, Y.
    Latendorf, T.
    Janssen, O.
    Becker, W.
    ALLERGY, 2007, 62 : 107 - 107
  • [8] Comparison of habitat suitability models using different habitat suitability evaluation methods
    Yi, Yujun
    Cheng, Xi
    Wieprecht, Silke
    Tang, Caihong
    Ecological Engineering, 2014, 71 : 335 - 345
  • [9] Comparison of habitat suitability models using different habitat suitability evaluation methods
    Yi, Yujun
    Cheng, Xi
    Wieprecht, Silke
    Tang, Caihong
    Ecological Engineering, 2014, 71 : 335 - 345
  • [10] Comparison of habitat suitability models using different habitat suitability evaluation methods
    Yi, Yujun
    Cheng, Xi
    Wieprecht, Silke
    Tang, Caihong
    ECOLOGICAL ENGINEERING, 2014, 71 : 335 - 345