共 50 条
A Comprehensive Validation Scheme for Satellite-Derived Land Surface Temperature Dataset
被引:2
|作者:
Ma, Jin
[1
]
Zhou, Ji
[1
]
Zhang, Tao
[1
]
Tang, Wenbin
[1
]
Wang, Yongjie
[1
]
机构:
[1] Univ Elect Sci & Technol China, Sch Resources & Environm, Chengdu 611731, Peoples R China
来源:
基金:
中国国家自然科学基金;
中国博士后科学基金;
关键词:
Land surface temperature;
Atmospheric measurements;
Land surface;
Uncertainty;
Radiometry;
Temperature measurement;
Spatial resolution;
Orbits;
Satellites;
Satellite broadcasting;
Atmospheric effect;
comprehensive validation;
land surface temperature (LST);
spatial representativeness;
uncertainty;
REPRESENTATIVENESS;
PRODUCTS;
ENERGY;
MODEL;
VIIRS;
LST;
D O I:
10.1109/TGRS.2024.3488083
中图分类号:
P3 [地球物理学];
P59 [地球化学];
学科分类号:
0708 ;
070902 ;
摘要:
Land surface temperature (LST) is a widely focused parameter between the land surface and the atmosphere. Currently, satellite remote sensing is the main approach to obtaining regional and global LST. Validation of satellite-derived LST can promote its application and provide feedback for the retrieval algorithms and parameterization schemes. The current widely used temperature-based method faces many influences, e.g., obtaining the ground truth on the pixel scale and its uncertainty. Here, a comprehensive validation scheme is proposed for validating the satellite-derived LST by combining the near-surface atmospheric correction for longwave-radiation-based in situ LST and considering the validation station's spatial representativeness, and applying it in the validation of AVHRR-derived LST. The LST "ground truth" of three validation stations in Heihe River Basin, China was obtained, with a mean uncertainty of 0.87 K (range: $0.47\sim 2.96$ K), 1.07 K ( $0.49\sim 1.81$ K), and 0.61 K ( $0.47\sim 1.13$ K) for A'rou superstation (ARS), daman superstation (DMS), and sidaoqiao superstation (SDQ), respectively. Validation of AVHRR-derived LST against the obtained "ground truth" shows that the random error is lower than 3 K, and the system error is station-dependent, with a range of $- 1.02\sim 3.93$ K. Further comparison indicated significant systematic error differences (range: $- 1.5\sim 3.45$ K) and inapparent random errors difference ( $- 0.84\sim 0.43$ K) between the proposed comprehensive scheme and the classic scheme at the selected stations. Since the main influences are considered in the proposed comprehensive validation scheme, the validation results are more objective and credible. The comprehensive validation scheme provides a reference for LST validation and could be extended to the validation of related hydrothermal parameters.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文