Spatiotemporal Bi-objective Evaluation Method for Urban Bus Systems

被引:0
|
作者
Wu M. [1 ]
An K. [1 ]
Zeng L. [1 ]
Li S. [1 ]
机构
[1] Key Laboratory of Road and Traffic Engineering of the Ministry of Education, Tongji Universtiy, Shanghai
来源
关键词
Bi-objective evaluation; Public transit performance; Space-time resources occupancy; Supply and demand matching; Traffic engineering;
D O I
10.11908/j.issn.0253-374x.21590
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The mismatching of supply and demand in bus systems in the space-time dimension leads to the waste of spatiotemporal resources as near-empty buses are still running according to schedules, especially during off-peak hours. In order to quantify the above problems, a bi-objective evaluation method was built upon the investigation of the interactions among passengers, buses, and road resources. The evaluation system consists of two indexes, the supply-demand matching index (SDMI) and the space-time occupancy index (STOI). The SDMI quantifies the matching degree of travel demand and bus line capacity, while the STOI measures the per capita occupancy of spatiotemporal resources in bus operation. The calculation of the SDMI and STOI were based on the global positioning system (GPS) data and the integrated circuit (IC) card transaction data, etc. Finally, four bus lines with different characteristics in Shanghai were used for case study. Considering the actual distribution of the two indexes, the classification thresholds of the bi-objective evaluation system were identified according to the cumulative frequency curve of the SDMI and STOI. The proposed method can be further utilized in the evaluation of public transit infrastructures and the optimization of bus type selection and bus scheduling, etc. © 2022, Editorial Department of Journal of Tongji University. All right reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:299 / 308and327
相关论文
共 25 条
  • [1] HUANG Sha, MENG Jingyu, WANG Xiaoyi, Evaluation system for public traffic in the small and medium-sized cities, Journal of Transport Information and Safety, 29, 1, (2011)
  • [2] CHANDRA S, BARI M E, DEVARASETTY P C, Et al., Accessibility evaluations of feeder transit services, Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 52, (2013)
  • [3] RYUS P, AUSMAN J, TEAF D, Et al., Development of Florida's transit level-of-service indicator, Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 1731, (2000)
  • [4] LINOVSKI O, BAKER D M, MANAUGH K., Equity in practice? Evaluations of equity in planning for bus rapid transit, Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 113, (2018)
  • [5] ZHANG Wenhui, LIU Wei, WANG Shengding, Et al., Evaluation of passenger satisfaction to conventional public transit based on a structural equation, Journal of Transportation Engineering and Information, 19, 1, (2021)
  • [6] YANG Xiaoguang, AN Jian, LIU Haode, Et al., Evaluation architecture discussion of route-level transit service quality, Journal of Transportation Systems Engineering and Information Technology, 10, 4, (2010)
  • [7] MAO Lin, Research on the evaluation method of intelligent public transport scheduling, (2018)
  • [8] BOARD T., Transit capacity and quality of service manual, (2013)
  • [9] GAO Guifeng, WEI Hua, YAN Baojie, Study on reliability evaluation of urban public transit service quality, Journal of Wuhan University of Technology (Transportation Science & Engineering), 31, 1, (2007)
  • [10] TROMPET M, LIU X, GRAHAM D J., Development of key performance indicator to compare regularity of service between urban bus operators, Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2216, 1, (2011)