Bilateral comparison of 1 Ω and 10 kΩ standards (ongoing BIPM key comparisons BIPM.EM-K13.a and 13.b) between the CEM (Spain) and the BIPM

被引:1
|
作者
Rolland, B. [1 ]
Stock, M. [1 ]
Gournay, P. [1 ]
Matías, L. [2 ]
Hortelano, A. [2 ]
Raso, F. [2 ]
Díaz de Aguilar, J. [2 ]
机构
[1] Bureau International des Poids et Mesures (BIPM), Pavillon de Breteuil, Sèvres,Cedex F-92312, France
[2] Centro Español de Metrología (CEM), Spain
关键词
D O I
10.1088/0026-1394/60/1A/01008
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Main text This report gives the result of a bilateral comparison of resistance between the CEM (Spain) and the BIPM carried out from March 2022 to September 2022. Two 1 Ω and two 10 kΩ travelling standards belonging to the BIPM were used. The comparison was carried out with an 'A-B-A' pattern of measurements; the standards were measured first at the BIPM for a period of about one month, then for a period of about one month at the CEM, and finally again at the BIPM. The measurand was the 4 terminal dc resistance at low power. The BIPM was the pilot laboratory, and the comparison forms part of the ongoing BIPM key comparisons BIPM.EM-K13.a (for 1 Ω) and BIPM.EM-K13b (for 10 kΩ). The results from the CEM and the BIPM were found to be in good agreement, with a difference D smaller than the relative expanded uncertainty U c (95% confidence, k = 2) giving D = 0.056 × 10-6, U c = 0.106 × 10-6 for 1 Ω and D = 0.020 × 10-6, U c = 0.068 × 10-6 for 10 kΩ. To reach the main text of this paper, click on Final Report. Note that this text is that which appears in Appendix B of the BIPM key comparison database https://www.bipm.org/kcdb/. The final report has been peer-reviewed and approved for publication by the CCEM, according to the provisions of the CIPM Mutual Recognition Arrangement (CIPM MRA). © 2023 BIPM & IOP Publishing Ltd.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Bilateral comparison of 1 Ω and 10 kΩ; standards (ongoing BIPM key comparisons BIPM.EM-K13.a and 13.b) between the NPLI (India) and the BIPM
    Fletcher, N.
    Goebel, R.
    Saleem, M.
    Singh, H. K.
    Ansari, M. A.
    Kiran, U.
    Saxena, A. K.
    [J]. METROLOGIA, 2019, 56 (1A)
  • [2] Bilateral comparison of 1 Ω and 10 kΩ standards (ongoing BIPM key comparisons BIPM.EM-K13.a and 13.b) between the NIMT (Thailand) and the BIPM
    Rolland, B.
    Fletcher, N.
    Khumthukthit, N.
    Jassadajin, C.
    [J]. METROLOGIA, 2017, 54
  • [3] Bilateral comparison of 1Ω and 10 kΩ standards (ongoing BIPM key comparisons BIPM.EM-K13.a and 13.b) between the BIM (Bulgaria) and the BIPM
    Rolland, B.
    Fletcher, N.
    Tenev, A.
    Hadzhistoykova, R.
    [J]. METROLOGIA, 2017, 54
  • [4] Bilateral comparison of 1 Ω and 10 kΩ standards (ongoing BIPM key comparisons BIPM.EM-K13.a and 13.b) between INRIM (Italy) and the BIPM
    Rolland, B.
    Stock, M.
    Gournay, P.
    Capra, P.P.
    Galliana, F.
    [J]. Metrologia, 2023, 60 (1A)
  • [5] Bilateral comparison of 1 Ω and 10 kΩ standards (ongoing BIPM key comparisons BIPM.EM-K13.a and 13.b) between the SMD (Belgium) and the BIPM
    Rolland, Benjamin
    Fletcher, Nick
    Viad, Dana
    [J]. METROLOGIA, 2017, 54
  • [6] Bilateral comparison of 1 Ω and 10 kΩ standards (ongoing BIPM key comparisons BIPM.EM-K13.a and 13.b) between the NMISA (South Africa) and the BIPM
    Rolland, B.
    Stock, M.
    Khoza, M.
    [J]. METROLOGIA, 2018, 55
  • [7] Bilateral comparison of 1 Ω and 10 kΩ standards (ongoing BIPM key comparisons BIPM.EM-K13.a and 13.b) between the NMC A*STAR (Singapore) and the BIPM
    Rolland, B.
    Stock, M.
    Chua, S. W.
    Lim, K. H.
    Tan, E.
    [J]. METROLOGIA, 2020, 57 (1A)
  • [8] Bilateral comparison of 1 Ω and 10 kΩ standards (ongoing BIPM key comparisons BIPM.EM-K13.a and 13.b) between the CMI (Czech Republic) and the BIPM
    Rolland, B.
    Fletcher, N.
    Kucera, J.
    Chrobok, P.
    Vojckov, L.
    [J]. METROLOGIA, 2017, 54
  • [10] Bilateral comparison of 1 Ω and 10 kΩ standards (ongoing BIPM key comparisons BIPM.EM-K13.a and 13.b) between the NSAI NML (Ireland) and the BIPM
    Rolland, B.
    Fletcher, N.
    Power, O.
    [J]. METROLOGIA, 2017, 54