A method for multi-stage group decision making based on evidence theory under hybrid preference information

被引:0
|
作者
Zhang F. [1 ]
Zhang L. [1 ]
Han J. [1 ]
机构
[1] School of Business, Guilin University of Electronic Technology, Guilin
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
conflict coefficient; evidence theory; hybrid preference information; incentive factor; multi-stage decision making;
D O I
10.12011/SETP2022-2903
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
In order to solve the aggregation problem of hybrid preference information in multistage group decision-making environments, evidence theory is introduced to uniformly measure real number, interval number, linguistic information, and linguistic intuitionistic fuzzy number information, and a new multi stage incentive aggregation method based on development stability and growth trend is proposed. Firstly, a fuzzy measure method based on improved grey correlation analysis is used to transform the hybrid preference information into a basic reliability distribution function (mass function). Secondly, the degree of evidence conflict is determined by integrating the conflict coefficient and the degree of similarity between evidences, and expert weights are calculated based on this; after that, the mass functions of different experts are modified and fused using the evidence weights and Demper combination rules. Thirdly, the difference between the ranking values of multi-stage schemes and average ranking values is used to measure the volatility of alternative schemes, and define the stability incentive adjustment coefficient. Finally, this decision-making method is applied to the selection of financing loans for small and micro enterprises by commercial banks to compare and analyze its rationality and feasibility. © 2023 Systems Engineering Society of China. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:3619 / 3635
页数:16
相关论文
共 39 条
  • [1] Zhan Q, Fu C, Xue M., Distance-based large-scale group decision-making method with group influence[J], International Journal of Fuzzy Systems, 23, pp. 535-554, (2021)
  • [2] Chen X, Zhang W, Xu X, Et al., Managing group confidence and consensus in intuitionistic fuzzy large group decision-making based on social media data mining[J], Group Decision and Negotiation, 31, 5, pp. 995-1023, (2022)
  • [3] Wu T, Zuheros C, Liu X, Et al., Managing minority opinions in large-scale group decision making based on community detection and group polarization, Computers & Industrial Engineering, 170, (2022)
  • [4] Liu P, Zhang K, Wang P, Et al., A clustering-and maximum consensus-based model for social network large-scale group decision making with linguistic distribution[J], Information Sciences, 602, pp. 269-297, (2022)
  • [5] Jiang H, Hu B Q., A novel three-way group investment decision model under intuitionistic fuzzy multi-attribute group decision-making environment[J], Information Sciences, 569, pp. 557-581, (2021)
  • [6] Liu Q, Wu H, Xu Z., Consensus model based on probability K-means clustering algorithm for large scale group decision making[J], International Journal of Machine Learning and Cybernetics, 12, 6, pp. 1609-1626, (2021)
  • [7] Wu Y, Gao Y, Zhang B, Et al., Minimum information-loss transformations to support heterogeneous group decision making in a distributed linguistic context[J], Information Fusion, 89, pp. 437-451, (2023)
  • [8] Wu Z, Liao H., A consensus reaching process for large‐scale group decision making with heterogeneous preference information[J], International Journal of Intelligent Systems, 36, 9, pp. 4560-4591, (2021)
  • [9] Zou W C, Wan S P, Chen S M., A fairness-concern-based LINMAP method for heterogeneous multi-criteria group decision making with hesitant fuzzy linguistic truth degrees[J], Information Sciences, 612, pp. 1206-1225, (2022)
  • [10] Jin W J, Huang C F, Qiu D F, Et al., The study on identification of key factors of emergency material support capability based ob hybrid decision-making method[J], Operations Research and Management Science, 29, 11, pp. 78-83, (2020)