Robust optimization design of multi-echelon supply chain based on Kriging meta-model

被引:0
|
作者
Zhu L. [1 ]
Wu F. [2 ]
Ouyang L. [3 ]
机构
[1] Department of Education and Science, Nanjing Polytechnic Institute, Nanjing
[2] School of Economics and Management, Anhui Polytechnic University, Wuhu
[3] College of Economics and Management, Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Nanjing
关键词
arena simulation; desirability function approach; Kriging meta-model; multi-echelon supply chain; robust parameter design;
D O I
10.13196/j.cims.2021.0804
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Due to the structural complexity and multiple objectives of multi-echelon supply chain, the influence of uncertain factors on its overall performance could not be ignored. To estimate the impact of uncertain factors on its overall performance? the arena simulation and Kriging meta-modeling technology were integrated to construct Kriging mean and standard deviation meta-models of multiple performance response indicators based on the idea of robust parameter design. With the help of the constructed Kriging meta-models and satisfaction function method, a robust comprehensive satisfaction optimization design strategy based on Kriging meta-model was given. The influence of uncertain factors on the robust optimization solution was measured by the nonparametric bootstrap sampling method, which was compared with the robust optimization method based on polynomial model. Simulation results show that the proposed method can effectively solve the robust optimization problem of multi-echelon supply chain with multiple performance response under uncertain parameters. The proposed method could ensure the supply chain system to achieve the desired optimal performance by minimizing the impact of uncertain factors on the supply chain performance? which provided a theoretical basis and decision-making reference for the stable operation of multi-echelon supply chain. © 2024 CIMS. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:396 / 406
页数:10
相关论文
共 30 条
  • [1] ELLE J, GUNS T, VERBEKEW, Using shared sell-through data to forecast wholesaler demand in multi-echelon supply chains[j], European Journal of Operational Research, 288, 2, pp. 466-479, (2021)
  • [2] CHINELLO HERBERT, HANSENZ KHALIDW, A s sessment of the impact of inventory optimization drivers in a multi-echelon supply chain : Case of a toy manufacturer, H J Computers &- Industrial Engineering, 141, (2020)
  • [3] YUED, YOUF Q., Game-theoretic modeling and optimization of multi-echelon supply chain design and operation under Stackelberg game and market equilibriumHJ, Computers &- Chemical Engineering, 71, pp. 347-361, (2014)
  • [4] TORDECILLARD, JUANAA, MONTOA - TORRESJ, Et al., Simulation-optimization methods for designing and assessing resilient supply chain networks under uncertainty scenarios : A review[j], Simulation Modelling Practice and Theory, 106, (2021)
  • [5] QUIGLEYJ, WALLSL, DEMIRELG, Et al., Supplier quality improvement : The value of information under uncertainty [j], European Journal of Operational Research, 264, 3, pp. 932-947, (2017)
  • [6] VUKK, DAMB ROSIOC, HAMADIY, Et al., Surrogatebased methods for black-box optimization Hj], International Transactions in Operational Research, 24, 3, pp. 393-424, (2017)
  • [7] BHOSEKARA IERAPETRITOUM, Advances in surrogate based modeling, feasibility analysis and optimization: A review[j], Computers &- Chemical Engineering, 108, 4, pp. 250-267, (2017)
  • [8] XIAO Tianli, Yizhong M A, Chenglong LIN, Ensemble Kriging modeling technique for quality design[j], Computer Integrated Manufacturing Systems, 27, 7, pp. 2023-2034, (2021)
  • [9] HASANIA, ESKANDARPOUR M, FATTAHIM, A simulation-based optimisation approach for multi-objective inventory control of perishable products in closed-loop supply chains under uncertainty[j], International}ournal of Advanced Operations Management, 10, 4, pp. 324-344, (2018)
  • [10] DEVIKAK, JAFARIANA, HASSANZADEHA, Et al., Optimizing of bullwhip effect and net stock amplification in three-echelon supply chains using evolutionary multi-objective metaheuristics [J], Annals of Operations Research, 242, 2, pp. 457-487, (2016)