Priority assessment model of on-line monitoring device allocation for power transformer

被引：0
|
作者：
Liang Y. [1 ]
Li K. [2 ]
Zhao J. [3 ]
Ma W. [1 ]
机构：
[1] College of Information and Control Engineering, China University of Petroleum, Qingdao, 266580, Shandong Province
[2] Key Laboratory of Power System Intelligent Allocation and Control (Shandong University) Ministry of Education, Jinan, 250061, Shandong Province
[3] State Grid of China Technology College, Jinan, 250002, Shandong Province
来源：
Dianwang Jishu/Power System Technology | 2016年 / 40卷 / 08期
关键词：
Assessment model; Device property; FAHP (fuzzy analytic hierarchy process); On-line monitoring devices; Risk benefit;
D O I：
10.13335/j.1000-3673.pst.2016.08.045
中图分类号：
学科分类号：
摘要：
An appropriate way to improve comprehensive benefits of on-line monitoring devices is a new issue in power industry. A priority assessment model of on-line monitoring device allocation for transformer was proposed. The assessment model consisted of device level and system level. The device level was divided into property assessment and operation condition assessment. Details of various assessment methods were described, including device property assessment based on fuzzy analytic hierarchy process (FAHP), operation condition assessment method based on condition assessment technology and system level assessment method based on risk benefit index. An actual grid was utilized to validate the model and its numerical results verified that the proposed assessment model could provide an appropriate on-line monitoring allocation order for transformers and considering multiple aspects related to this problem could give a more comprehensive assessment result than just considering one or two of them. The research in this paper could provide a feasible reference for on-line monitoring device allocation in power industry. © 2016, Power System Technology Press. All right reserved.
引用
收藏
页码：2562 / 2569
页数：7
相关论文
共 24 条
  • [1] Yang L., Hao Y., Li W., Et al., A mechanical calculation model for on-line icing-monitoring system of overhead transmission lines, Proceedings of the CSEE, 30, 19, pp. 100-105, (2010)
  • [2] Bao Y., Partial discharge pulse waveform feature extraction and classification techniques, Proceedings of the CSEE, 33, 28, pp. 168-175, (2013)
  • [3] Liang Y., Li K., Zhao J., Et al., Research on the dynamic monitoring cycle adjustment strategy of transformer chromatography on-line monitoring devices, Proceedings of the CSEE, 34, 9, pp. 1446-1453, (2014)
  • [4] Anders G., Vaccaro A., Innovations in Power Systems Reliability, pp. 13-140, (2011)
  • [5] Razi-Kazemi A., Vakilian M., Niayesh K., Et al., Priority assessment of online monitoring investment for power system circuit breakers-part i: qualitative-quantitative approach, IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery, 28, 2, pp. 928-938, (2013)
  • [6] Liu W., Liang C., Xu P., Et al., Identification of critical line in power systems based on flow betweenness, Proceedings of the CSEE, 33, 31, pp. 90-98, (2013)
  • [7] Li H., Hu Y., Tang X., Et al., Method for on-line operating conditions assessment for a grid-connected wind turbine generator system, Proceedings of the CSEE, 33, 30, pp. 103-109, (2013)
  • [8] Tanaka H., Tsukao S., Yamashita D., Et al., Multiple criteria assessment of substation conditions by pair-wise comparison of analytic hierarchy process, IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery, 25, 4, pp. 3017-3023, (2010)
  • [9] Nguyen T.T., Gordon-Brown L., Constrained fuzzy hierarchical analysis for portfolio selection under higher moments, IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, 20, 4, pp. 666-682, (2012)
  • [10] Liao R., Zheng H., Grzybowski S., Et al., An integrated decision-making model for condition assessment of power transformers using fuzzy approach and evidential reasoning, IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery, 26, 2, pp. 1111-1118, (2011)
123