Flow instabilities in a thimble-based heat transfer element

被引:0
|
作者
Chen K. [1 ]
Yan C. [1 ]
Meng Z. [1 ]
Ding T. [1 ]
机构
[1] Fundamental Science on Nuclear Safety and Simulation Technology Laboratory, Harbin Engineering University, Harbin
关键词
Flashing instability; Flow instabilities; Geysering oscillations; Natural circulation; Thimble-based heat transfer element; Unstable boundary;
D O I
10.11990/jheu.201701006
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
To understand natural circulation flow instabilities in a thimble-based heat transfer element, an experimental study was conducted on a monotube experimentation unit using different heating powers and inlet subcooling indices to analyze the unstable flow phenomena that may occur at low pressures, as well as on their driving mechanisms. The unstable region was confirmed and the geyser and the flashing instability boundary represented by dimensionless inlet subcooling and heating power were obtained. Results indicate that the geysering and flashing instability flow occurred successively, following the decrease in inlet subcooling. Compared with conventional natural circulation loops, the circulation flow of the thimble-based heat exchange element is unique in the fact that the fluid in the rising segment transfers heat to the fluid in the downcomer; therefore, the fluid temperature decreases in the rising segment and the condensation of steam bubbles becomes more serious. This effect easily causes geysering instability and delays the occurrence of flashing instability to some degree. When the flashing phenomenon occurs, the scope of the ratio between the flow oscillation period and the necessary time of fluid passing in the rising segment becomes 0.8~1.1. © 2018, Editorial Department of Journal of HEU. All right reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:870 / 875
页数:5
相关论文
共 18 条
  • [1] Schulz T.L., Westinghouse AP1000 advanced passive plant, Nuclear Engineering and Design, 236, 14-16, pp. 1547-1557, (2006)
  • [2] Stosic Z.V., Brettschuh W., Stoll U., Boiling water reactor with innovative safety concept: The Generation III+ SWR-1000, Nuclear Engineering and Design, 238, 8, pp. 1863-1901, (2008)
  • [3] Hinds D., Maslak C., Next-generation nuclear energy: The ESBWR, Nuclear News, 49, 1, pp. 35-40, (2006)
  • [4] Ruspini L.C., Marcel C.P., Clausse A., Two-phase flow instabilities: A review, International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 71, pp. 521-548, (2014)
  • [5] Manera A., Prasser H.M., Van D.H.T., Et al., A comparison of void-fraction measurements during flashing-induced instabilities obtained with a wire-mesh sensor and a gamma-transmission set-up, (2001)
  • [6] Aritomi M., Chiang J.H., Nakahashi T., Et al., Fundamental study on thermo-hydraulics during start-up in natural circulation boiling water reactors, (I) thermo-hydraulic instabilities, Journal of Nuclear Science and Technology, 29, 7, pp. 631-641, (1992)
  • [7] Jiang S.Y., Wu X.X., Zhang Y.J., Experimental study of two-phase flow oscillation in natural circulation, Nuclear Science and Engineering, 135, 2, pp. 177-189, (2000)
  • [8] Prasad G.V.D., Pandey M., Kalra M.S., Review of research on flow instabilities in natural circulation boiling systems, Progress in Nuclear Energy, 49, 6, pp. 429-451, (2007)
  • [9] Hou X., Sun Z., Sun Q., Et al., Experimental study on geysering in an open natural circulation system, Journal of Harbin Engineering University, 37, 4, pp. 556-561, (2016)
  • [10] Qi Z., Tong L., Cao X., Preliminary experimental study on geysering phenomena in heating system, Nuclear Power Engineering, 33, 2, pp. 76-80, (2011)