A Rapid Mode Pursuing Sampling Method for High Dimensional Optimization Problems

被引:0
|
作者
Wu Y. [1 ]
Long T. [1 ,2 ]
Shi R. [1 ]
Wang G.G. [3 ]
机构
[1] School of Aerospace Engineering, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing
[2] Key Laboratory of Dynamics and Control of Flight Vehicle of Ministry of Education, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing
[3] School of Mechatronic Systems Engineering, Simon Fraser University, Surrey, V3T0A3, BC
关键词
Adaptive metamodel; Approximate optimization; Global optimization; Mode pursuing sampling; Significant design space;
D O I
10.3901/JME.2019.03.138
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Approximate optimization strategies using design of computer experiments (DoCE) and metamodels have been widely applied in design of modern complex engineering systems. Mode pursuing sampling method (MPS) is a representative of such optimization algorithms. A rapid mode pursuing sampling method using significant design space concept (notated as RMPS-SDS) is proposed in this work to alleviate the low efficiency problem of MPS in solving high dimensional optimization problems. The idea of significant design space is incorporated into the MPS framework, and a sample point allocation strategy is designed to enhance the local search capability and convergence speed of MPS. RMPS-SDS is tested on a number of standard numerical benchmark problems and two engineering design problems and compared with MPS and GA. The comparison results indicate that with the same computational budget (i. e., the same number of function evaluations), results of RMPS-SDS are much closer to the theoretical global optima with lower standard deviation for multiple runs. It is thus demonstrated that the proposed RMPS-SDS outperforms the standard MPS in terms of efficiency, convergence, and robustness in solving high dimensional optimization problems, which is more promising for engineering practices. © 2019 Journal of Mechanical Engineering.
引用
收藏
页码:138 / 146
页数:8
相关论文
共 22 条
  • [1] Simpson T.W., Booke A.J., Ghosh D., Et al., Approximation methods in multidisciplinary analysis and optimization: a panel discussion, Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 27, 5, pp. 302-313, (2004)
  • [2] Wang G.G., Shan S., Review of metamodeling techniques in support of engineering design optimization, Journal of Mechanical Design, 129, 4, pp. 370-380, (2007)
  • [3] Myers R.H., Montgomery D.C., Anderson-Cook C.M., Response surface methodology: process and product optimization using designed experiments, (2016)
  • [4] Buhmann M.D., Radial basis functions: theory and implementations, (2003)
  • [5] Simpson T.W., Mauery T.M., Korte J.J., Et al., Kriging models for global approximation in simulation-based multidisciplinary design optimization, AIAA Journal, 39, 12, pp. 2233-2241, (2001)
  • [6] Long T., Liu J., Wang G.G., Et al., Discuss on approximate optimization strategies using design of computer experiments and metamodels for flight vehicle design, Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 52, 14, pp. 79-105, (2016)
  • [7] Long T., Guo X., Peng L., Et al., Optimization strategy using dynamic radial basis function metamodel based on trust region, Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 50, 7, pp. 184-190, (2014)
  • [8] Cheng G.H., Younis A., Hajikolaei K.H., Et al., Trust region based mode pursuing sampling method for global optimization of high dimensional design problems, Journal of Mechanical Design, 137, 2, (2015)
  • [9] Wang G.G., Dong Z., Aitchison P., Adaptive response surface method-a global optimization scheme for approximation-based design problems, Engineering Optimization, 33, 6, pp. 707-733, (2001)
  • [10] Peng L., Liu L., Long T., Study of sequential radial basis function for computation-intensive design optimization problem, 12th AIAA Aviation Technology, Integration and Operations (ATIO) Conference, (2012)