GNSS undifferenced and uncombined data processing and PPP-RTK high-precision positioning

被引:0
|
作者
Yuan Y. [1 ]
Hou P. [1 ,2 ]
Zhang B. [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] State Key Laboratory of Geodesy and Earth's Dynamics, Innovation Academy for Precision Measurement Science and Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan
[2] College of Earth and Planetary Sciences, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing
[3] State Key Laboratory of Satellite Navigation System and Equipment Technology, 54th Research Institute, China Electronics Technology Group Corporation, Shijiazhuang
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
data processing; functional model; GNSS; PPP-RTK; rank-deficiency elimination; undifferenced and uncombined data;
D O I
10.11947/j.AGCS.2022.20220134
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
This work discusses the origins, features, and applications of GNSS differenced and combined data processing methods. After pointing out some limits of the differenced and combined methods under the background of multi-frequency and multi-GNSS, we summarize the advantages of the undifferenced and uncombined data processing method and introduce the rank-deficiency elimination strategy that is used to construct full-rank undifferenced and uncombined models. Based on this strategy, we systematically formulate a class of undifferenced and uncombined integer ambiguity resolution-enabled precise point positioning (PPP-RTK) functional models, including code-plus-phase and phase-only categories. Both categories impose different constraints on ionospheric delays and yield three variants, including ionosphere-weighted, ionosphere-float, and ionosphere-fixed variants. All variants consider both code and frequency division multiple access signals. Finally, we evaluate the undifferenced and uncombined PPP-RTK performance by conducting boat-borne, airborne, and tractor-borne positioning experiments. Results show that, for three cases, the time to first fix is less than 10 s, the ambiguity success rate is higher than 96%, the horizontal positioning accuracy is better than 2 cm, and the vertical positioning accuracy is better than 5 cm. For Galileo+GPS+BDS triple-system tractor-borne positioning, the performance of phase-only PPP-RTK is comparable to that of code-plus-phase PPP-RTK. Compared to Galileo+GPS dual-system positioning, triple-system positioning decreases the time to first fix from several hundreds of seconds to several seconds, improves the ambiguity success rate from approximately 85% to better than 99%, and improves the positioning accuracy by approximately 30%. © 2022 SinoMaps Press. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1225 / 1238
页数:13
相关论文
共 37 条
  • [1] MORTON Y J, VAN DIGGELEN F, SPILKER J J, Et al., Position, navigation, and timing technologies in the 21st century:integrated satellite navigation, sensor systems, and civil applications, (2021)
  • [2] TEUNISSEN P J G, MONTENBRUCK O., Springer handbook of global navigation satellite systems, (2017)
  • [3] YANG Yuanxi, YANG Cheng, REN Xia, PNT intelligent services[J], Acta Geodaetica et Cartographica Sinica, 50, 8, pp. 1006-1012, (2021)
  • [4] YANG Y, DING Q, GAO W, Et al., Principle and performance of BDSBAS and PPP-B2b of BDS-3[J], Satellite Navigation, 3, 1, pp. 1-9, (2022)
  • [5] YANG Yuanxi, LIU Li, LI Jinlong, Et al., Featured services and performance of BDS-3[J], Science Bulletin, 66, 20, pp. 2135-2143, (2021)
  • [6] YANG Yuanxi, MAO Yue, SUN Bijiao, Basic performance and future developments of BeiDou global navigation satellite system[J], Satellite Navigation, 1, 1, (2020)
  • [7] BLEWITT G., Advances in Global Positioning System technology for geodynamics investigations:1978-1992, Contributions of Space Geodesy to Geodynamics:Technology, 25, pp. 195-213, (1993)
  • [8] GOAD C C, REMONDI B W., Initial relative positioning results using the Global Positioning System[J], Bulletin Géodésique, 58, 2, pp. 193-210, (1984)
  • [9] SCHAFFRIN B, GRAFAREND E., Generating classes of equivalent linear models by nuisance parameter elimination-applications to GPS observations[J], Manuscripta Geodaetiica, 11, 3, pp. 262-271, (1986)
  • [10] ZUMBERGE J F, HEFLIN M B, JEFFERSON D C, Et al., Precise point positioning for the efficient and robust analysis of GPS data from large networks, Journal of Geophysical Research:Solid Earth, 102, B3, pp. 5005-5017, (1997)