Differential game analysis of ecological R&D, cooperative promotion and pricing in the low-carbon supply chain

被引：0
|
作者：
You D.-M. [1 ,2 ]
Zhu G.-J. [1 ]
机构：
[1] School of Business, Central South University, Changsha
[2] Collaborative Innovation Center of Resource-Conserving & Environment-Friendly Societyand Ecological Civilization, Central South University, Changsha
来源：
Zhu, Gui-Ju (orangeacademic2014@163.com) | 1600年 / Northeast University卷 / 31期
关键词：
Advertisement promotion; Differential game; Eco-technology innovation; Low-carbon supply chain; Retail price;
D O I：
10.13195/j.kzyjc.2015.0432
中图分类号：
学科分类号：
摘要：
Aiming at solving the problem of R&D, promotion and pricing in the low-carbon supply chain, a differential game model is constructed. Both the products' low-carbon degree and goodwill are used as state variables. Meanwhile, it is considered that the market demand is affected by multiple factors, including the low-carbon degree, the goodwill and the retail price. Then, the feedback equilibrium strategies under different decision situations are obtained and compared. Furthermore, the sensitivity analysis of related parameters is conducted by using the numerical simulation method. The results show that the economic performance and environment performance of the low-carbon supply chain can achieve "win-win" with the help of centralized decision. In decentralized decision, wholesale price has important but different influences on equilibrium strategies and profits. The products' low-carbon degree trajectory is monotonic while the goodwill trajectory shows changing diversity. © 2016, Editorial Office of Control and Decision. All right reserved.
引用
下载
收藏
页码：1047 / 1056
页数：9
相关论文
共 31 条
  • [1] Carrillo-Hermosilla J., del Rio Gonzalez P., Konnola T., Ecoinnovation: When Sustainability and Competitiveness Shake Hands, pp. 1-10, (2014)
  • [2] Eiadat Y., Kelly A., Roche G., Et al., Green and Competitive? An Empirical Test of the Mediating Role of Environmental Innovation Strategy, J of World Business, 43, 2, pp. 131-145, (2008)
  • [3] Schiederig T., Tietze F., Herstatt C., Green innovation in technology and innovation management: An exploratory literature review, R&D Management, 42, 2, pp. 180-192, (2012)
  • [4] Liu Z., Anderson T.D., Cruz J.M., Consumer environmental awareness and competition in two-stage supply chains, European J of Operational Research, 218, 3, pp. 602-613, (2012)
  • [5] Matthews H.S., Hendrickson C.T., Weber C.L., The importance of carbon footprint estimation boundaries, Environmental Science and Technology, 42, 16, pp. 5839-5842, (2008)
  • [6] Du S.F., Dong J.F., Liang L., Et al., Optional production policy with emission permits and trading, Chinese J of Management Science, 17, 3, pp. 81-86, (2009)
  • [7] An C.Y., Tang Y.J., Research on decision model of enterprises' carbon emission reduction under emission trading system, Economic Research J, 58, 8, pp. 45-58, (2012)
  • [8] Xie X.P., Zhao D.Z., Low carbon supply chain production and trading decision-making mechanism, Control and Decision, 29, 4, pp. 651-658, (2013)
  • [9] Hu B.Y., Peng Q.Y., Game analysis on cooperation based on R&D-advertisement in Supply chain, J of Management Science in China, 11, 2, pp. 61-70, (2008)
  • [10] Xiong X.S., Zhao Y., Optimal advertising and retail pricing in a durable goods supply chain, Systems Engineering-Theory & Practice, 34, 6, pp. 1425-1430, (2014)
1234