Rendezvous and docking of spacecraft with single thruster: Path planning and tracking control

被引:0
|
作者
Geng Y. [1 ]
Li C. [1 ]
Guo Y. [1 ]
Biggs J.D. [2 ]
机构
[1] School of Astronautics, Harbin Institute of Technology, Harbin
[2] Department of Aerospace Science and Technology, Politecnico di Milano, Milano
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
CLF; Helical motion; Rendezvous and docking; Single thruster spacecraft; Trajectory planning;
D O I
10.7527/S1000-6893.2020.23880
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
A novel path planning and tracking control approach is proposed for rendezvous and docking of spacecraft with a single thruster. Firstly, since the thruster is fixed along the X axis of the spacecraft, the transfer trajectory of the spacecraft from the initial position to the desired position is designed as a helix whose parameters are calculated to ensure that the initial point and final velocity of the trajectory are in accordance with those of the spacecraft. The curvature of the trajectory can be minimized by the proposed helical motion. Secondly, to reduce the difficulty in trajectory tracking and decrease the amplitude of the control torque, this paper proposes an improved helical motion by rotating the traditional helical line with appropriate angles in 3-D space. In this way, the initial direction of the trajectory can be aligned with the X axis of the spacecraft, while the curvature integral of the curve is minimized. Furthermore, to track the planned trajectory and the desired force direction, a sliding mode based Control Lyapunov Function (CLF) method is presented. When the angle between the X axis and the desired control force direction is large, the standard CLF law is adopted. Then the control law switches to sliding mode control in the case that the states are near the sliding mode surface. Simulations are conducted to show the superiority of the proposed rotated helical motions to traditional approaches. © 2020, Beihang University Aerospace Knowledge Press. All right reserved.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 33 条
  • [1] HAND E., Interplanetary small satellites come of age, Science, 36, 6404, pp. 736-737, (2018)
  • [2] ROMERO C A, BIGGS J, TOPPUTO F., Attitude control for the LUMIO CubeSat in deep space, 70th International Astronautical Congress (IAC 2019), pp. 1-13, (2019)
  • [3] HE Q, LI J, HAN C., Multiple-revolution solutions of the transverse-eccentricity-based lambert problem, Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, 33, 1, pp. 265-269, (2010)
  • [4] YANG Z, LUO Y Z, ZHANG J, Et al., Homotopic perturbed Lambert algorithm for long-duration rendezvous optimization, Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, 38, 11, pp. 2215-2223, (2015)
  • [5] SUN L, HUO W., 6-DOF integrated adaptive backstepping control for spacecraft proximity operations, IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, 51, 3, pp. 2433-2443, (2015)
  • [6] CAPELLO E, PUNTA E, DABBENE F, Et al., Sliding-mode control strategies for rendezvous and docking maneuvers, Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, 40, 6, pp. 1481-1487, (2017)
  • [7] LU S, XU S J., Adaptive learning control strategy for autonomous rendezvous of spacecrafts on elliptical orbit, Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 30, 1, pp. 127-131, (2009)
  • [8] BIGGS J D, NEGRI A., Orbit-attitude control in a circular restricted three-body problem using distributed reflectivity devices, Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, 42, 12, pp. 2712-2721, (2019)
  • [9] LIU X, MENG Z, YOU Z., Adaptive collision-free formation control for under-actuated spacecraft, Aerospace Science and Technology, 79, pp. 223-232, (2018)
  • [10] INVERNIZZI D, LOVERA M, ZACCARIAN L., Dynamic attitude planning for trajectory tracking in thrust-vectoring UAVs, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 65, 1, pp. 453-460, (2019)