Experiment on swelling strain of confined coal mass with CO2 sequestration

被引:0
|
作者
Zhang B.-N. [1 ,2 ]
Liang W.-G. [1 ,2 ]
Han J.-J. [1 ,2 ]
Li Z.-G. [1 ]
机构
[1] College of Mining Engineering, Taiyuan University of Technology, Taiyuan
[2] Key Laboratory of In-situ Property-improving Under Mining of Ministry of Education, Taiyuan University of Technology, Taiyuan
来源
Liang, Wei-Guo (liangweiguo@tyut.edu.cn) | 1600年 / China Coal Society卷 / 41期
关键词
Carbon dioxide sequestration; Coal swelling strain; Deformation anisotropy; Porosity;
D O I
10.13225/j.cnki.jccs.2015.0535
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
In order to investigate the coal volumetric swelling during CO2 storage, the self-developed MCQ-Ⅱ CO2-ECBM experimental equipment was used to perform coal deformation through injecting CO2 to meager coal, meager lean coal and weakly caking coal samples (100 mm×100 mm×200 mm) with constant injection pressure under 31 MPa bulk stress at 25℃. At the same time, the micro-pores were investigated with nine small coal samples (6 mm×6 mm×6 mm) through a micro-CT system. The results show that: At minimum 4.5 μm observation of CT section structure, the meager coal porosity (4.67%) is less than that of meager lean coal (5.39%) and weakly caking coal (12.10%); During 12 hours of CO2 injection, coal volumetric strain is influenced by pore pressure and CO2 adsorption swelling, which is linearly proportional to the amount of gaseousness CO2 storage under 31 MPa confinement pressure; With the same CO2 storage, the volumetric swelling strain of the meager coal is more than that of the weakly caking coal and meager lean coal; Due to the anisotropy of modulus of elasticity, the radial strain increases faster than the axial strain and both of them are linearly proportional to the amount of gaseousness CO2 storage. © 2016, China Coal Society. All right reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:324 / 331
页数:7
相关论文
共 21 条
  • [1] Xu J., Zhang J., Pan X., Et al., Current status of carbon dioxide storage technologies, Coal Conversion, 28, 3, pp. 80-85, (2005)
  • [2] Shi Q., Guo W., Han Y., Et al., Ocean disposal of carbon dioxide, Marine Science Bulletin, 24, 2, pp. 72-78, (2005)
  • [3] Stefan B., Didier B., John B., Et al., CO<sub>2</sub> storage capacity estimation: Methodology and gaps, International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, pp. 430-443, (2007)
  • [4] Liu Y., Li X., Bai B., Preliminary estimation of CO<sub>2</sub> storage capacity of coalbeds in China, Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 24, 16, pp. 2947-2952, (2005)
  • [5] Liang W., Zhao Y., Di W., Et al., Experiments on methane displacement by carbon dioxide in large coal specimens, Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering, 44, pp. 579-589, (2011)
  • [6] Wong S., Law F., Deng X., Et al., Enhanced coalbed methane and CO<sub>2</sub> storage in anthracite coals-micro-pilot test at South Qinshui, Shanxi, China, International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 1, pp. 215-222, (2007)
  • [7] Li X., Fang Z., Current status and technical challenges of CO<sub>2</sub> storage in coal seams and enhanced coalbed methane recovery: An overview, International Journal of Coal Science & Technology, 1, 1, pp. 93-102, (2014)
  • [8] Walker P.L., Verma S.K., Riverautrilla J., Et al., A direct measurement of expansion in coals and macerals induced by carbon dioxide and methanol, Fuel, 67, pp. 719-726, (1988)
  • [9] Karacan C.O., Swelling-induced volumetric strains internal to a stressed coal associated with CO<sub>2</sub> sorption, International Journal of Coal Geology, 72, pp. 209-220, (2007)
  • [10] Wang S., Elsworth D., Liu J., Permeability evolution in fractured coal: The roles of fracture geometry and water-content, International Journal of Coal Geology, 87, pp. 13-25, (2011)